Alex Jones is finished. His YouTube channel taken down.

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
50,709
Reputation
5,068
Daps
114,327
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
tenor.gif

:mjlol:

Milos was depatformed/censored by 30 companies in 2 months???

:francis:

No. This answer is No, Milos was not censored/de-platformed by 30 companies in 2 months. In fact, Alex Jones/Infowars is the 1st person/company to have ever been banned by this many websites and companies.

No need to lie blatantly Hulk.
 
Last edited:

Starman

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
15,775
Reputation
-2,904
Daps
34,517
As I mentioned, sometimes extreme examples are needed to show that there are some things that should not be allowed.

I don't want to be censored and shyt, but take this site for example, there are things you can and cannot say here, and some of those things are not logically consistent. Like you can use slurs and make threats against Latinos , Asians, Caucasians, gays etc., but you are not allowed to use slurs or make threats against African Americans or Jews (those are the only 2 groups that I've seen people get in trouble for). Why is that? Well, it has to do with the audience. The audience has deemed what is appropriate and not appropriate. The coli's audience has concluded that slurs again black people or jews is not acceptable. However, you are free to say whatever you want about other races. shyt, there's even an acronym used to call white people crackers (cac). An acronym for, say, "nan" would not be allowed (that's just an example, I personally try not to use slurs against anybody).

So, apply that logic to facebook, youtube, and twitter. Their audiences do not accept Jones' speech.

So, you're saying the rule Jones and bushed/banned posters on this site broke is being unpopular or expressing unpopular opinion. And this is acceptable to you? Why isnt that in writing? If we cant get consistent application of the rules, give posters transparency. Make it a vilation to express unpopular opinion or be unpopular .
 
Last edited:

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
50,709
Reputation
5,068
Daps
114,327
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
this is the hill you trying to die for. alex jones.:hhh:

there is nothing stopping alex jones or you from creating your own platform/website, so that "chill speech" is null and void.

social media companies have always been "banning/suspending" accounts for forever, but I doubt you cared until its alex jones:hhh:

Of course social media and websites have banned/censored/de-platformed but no one has been banned simultaneously by 30 companies in 2 month period. Never happened.....the question should be why?? Because of speech?....did he murder somebody? have people died because of what he has said? did he give people dangerous products? is he promoting uncouth ideas to children? The Sandy Hook court case is not over, if he is proven innocent of all charges then what, are these websites going to apologize and put him back on the websites?

I just recently posted about Boyce Watkins being banned for talking about illegal immigrants, Dr. Boyce Watkins Banned From Facebook Messenger for Hate Speech Regarding Illegal Immigration, but I also done so in the past.

I've talked Jimmy Dore being censored in multiple threads. from 4:10 - 15:10 shows you how government, specifically a few Congressfolks, are behind a lot of this new censorship we are seeing. This whole It's a private company is much more twisted than it appears.

I have talked about Boyce Watkins, Jimmy Dore, on Tulsi Gabbard, Cynthia McKinney....other liberal leaning people (Boyce not really liberal per se).........you can't box me in some political/ideological island.

I like Truth or at the minimum questioning of Official Establishment Corporate Sponsored Narratives.

My point has always been that people who question or assess those narratives will be or are going to be banned. These happen to be voices that you want to be out there questioning and making you think, so you aren't inundated with one side of a story.

That's where we are heading, one narrative society that can't be questioned, wwithout repercussions, especially when you get down to the commerce/banking element.

Boyce Watkins could easily have his PayPal taking away, if he continues to talk about illegal immigration in the future......I mean the precedent is being set right now.

This is not about Alex Jones, this is about speech that is being called "dangerous" and creating an atmosphere where people won't express how they feel, because fear of loosng access to biggest websites or even worse loosing ability to conduct commerce.

The Chinese Social Credit Score system is the embodiment of that. The type of system is being prepped for the U.S. As I've posted several times, this is the real outcome for this thread......yet not one naysayer has refuted me on that point. Tiptoed around it like a ballerina .... I wonder why :jbhmm:
 
Last edited:

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
50,709
Reputation
5,068
Daps
114,327
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
:mjlit:Would you be interested in taking a ban bet on how that turns out?:mjlit:

:jbhmm:

I'm intrigued by seeing you take that L, but nah I'll pass.

If he looses it doesn't effect me.
If he wins it doesn't effect me.

Yeah. The outcome is going be interesting, because if he does win then all these tech companies are in a unique position of using that as justification....of course they would just bring up Muslim and LGBT agenda stuff.
 
Last edited:

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,500
Daps
37,704
Coward. Talking that big shyt about freeze peach but scared to take a ban bet on a messageboard. :umad:
He lost Inforwars. He’s not in a space emotionally to lose this forum.

If he was smart he would take the free-market approach and build a loony toon website where he can lord over it.
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,212
Reputation
-2,358
Daps
17,088
As I mentioned, sometimes extreme examples are needed to show that there are some things that should not be allowed.

I don't want to be censored and shyt, but take this site for example, there are things you can and cannot say here, and some of those things are not logically consistent. Like you can use slurs and make threats against Latinos , Asians, Caucasians, gays etc., but you are not allowed to use slurs or make threats against African Americans or Jews (those are the only 2 groups that I've seen people get in trouble for). Why is that? Well, it has to do with the audience. The audience has deemed what is appropriate and not appropriate. The coli's audience has concluded that slurs again black people or jews is not acceptable. However, you are free to say whatever you want about other races. shyt, there's even an acronym used to call white people crackers (cac). An acronym for, say, "nan" would not be allowed (that's just an example, I personally try not to use slurs against anybody).

So, apply that logic to facebook, youtube, and twitter. Their audiences do not accept Jones' speech.

When did the “audience” agree that Jews are off limits but the other groups aren’t?
:mjpls:
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
50,709
Reputation
5,068
Daps
114,327
Reppin
In the Silver Lining


What I tell yah.

EVERYTHING is being censored, left, right, independent, that does not agree with these tech corp/establishment nexus that has been built.

Watch the video...pages that identify are being called Spam or Russian-like or just removed altogether.
 
Top