MenacingMonk
Tranquilo
Did the props handler get a charge? If not, They should be charged for some shyt too.
No. He was the egomaniacal producer bossing everyone around, staying in plush hotels while having the rest of the crew sleep in RVs 30+ miles away in 110 degree heat. Having them work on low sleep, for long hours with low pay.Ehhh you’re talking about an actor whose job is mainly just to literally show up on set and perform. Those type of things technically aren’t in their job description. Before you bring up him being a producer, that’s in name only.
Yep, they got charged as well.Did the props handler get a charge? If not, They should be charged for some shyt too.
100% all this.No. He was the egomaniacal producer bossing everyone around, staying in plush hotels while having the rest of the crew sleep in RVs 30+ miles away in 110 degree heat. Having them work on low sleep, for long hours with low pay.
He created the unstable horrible working conditions that led to this.
Don’t let him off the hook. Actually read into the details and what the crew had to say.
Hate when people cape for these rich white egotistical fukks.
He is. He copped a plea dealThis is going to be interesting to see what happens. I thought I read that the assistant director - the one who handed Baldwin the gun - was "cooperating" with the prosecution.
64 years old smh if he goes down hes in there untik hes in his 80s if hes still around smh
No.Somebody load the gun or switch the gun from the pop gun, same case with Brandon Lee he was murdered, and so was this woman
bullets don't accidently get loaded in guns
The problem with this is, the gun was supposed to look like its live, and he was supposed to point it an unsafe direction as requested by the director.while he does have some what of a point that the armorer did a shyt job and she should have checked too,
Gun safety 101 (which he should know himself) is that he check if the gun is live.
he can't solely rely on the armorer and director...he needs to take accountability
He pointed the gun at a person and pulled the trigger. That violates at least 3 of the 4 rules of gun safety.The problem with this is, the gun was supposed to look like its live, and he was supposed to point it an unsafe direction as requested by the director.
Gun safety 101 wouldn't really prevent this scenario. If you can't trust the armorer to separate live rounds from dummy rounds, the only way to safely determine which is which with certainly would be for baldwin to manually do an ammo count and inspect each indivdual bullet use in the entire production.
perhaps even test fire some at a range. a movie production probably uses tens of thousands of dummy rounds. Obviously he's going to have to rely on the armorer to handle that.
typical Gun safety doesn't go into that much depth anyway, at ccw class for example, you just remove the mag or cylinder, look to see if is loaded or not. but they wanted to gun to be loaded so..
he was supposed to. they were filming a scene where he points a gun at someone a pulls the trigger. The director is on record saying he instructed him to do that. You never once seen a film where an actor pointed a gun at someone?He pointed the gun at a person and pulled the trigger. That violates at least 3 of the 4 rules of gun safety.