After 51 Years of Marriage, Judge Finds Out Children Aren't His... GMB

[Shadow King]

First, I've already mentioned that you do not have to sign the certificate. Second, you have leeway in getting the test done before a designated time period determined by each state, to use in court to have you removed from any child support attempts. Last, none of the arguing emerges if you refuse to argue about it. She may fuss at you, but fussing at you is not an argument. You only open yourself to an argument if you set there trying to convince her to allow you to get a DNA test. It is only an argument if you are wasting time trying to change her mind.

Again, refusing to sign the certificate brings up the strife you wish to avoid.

 

[Uachet]

Breh normally I agree with everything you say but on this....nah.

If he makes it clear that one of his requirements that he had before he met her was a paternity test, and she rocks with him, it's all clear.

No need for subterfuge or covert ops.

My godbrother got played like this.

My friend got burned as well. Ever since, my rule ironclad has always been test for no stress.

Had it before I met you, so im not budging on it.

Everyone then acts accordingly.

Yes, and I said if he wants to discuss vetting a woman before sex then a new thread should be made. He came in, called me dumb, for discussing what to do after the baby is here. No one was discussing before even a sexual relationship was started. Remember, the initial discussion is about a man who found out years later the children he thought were his, are not his. So the solution to a situation like that, even when married, is to get your children tested.

Vetting should always be done, I am a strong proponent of that. Still, many do not vet. Many make mistakes. There is still a solution that can be enacted, after that point concerning paternity. The solution I gave, was a solution for a child already on the way. One that every free man in the US has the power to do without arguing over it with the mother of the child.

 

[Uachet]

Again, refusing to sign the certificate brings up the strife you wish to avoid.

I think you mistake my reason for stating you do not need to argue over it. It is not about avoiding strife. It is about avoiding unnecessary requests and arguments over the request, when you have the power to do the action anyway. It is about not being passive, and instead taking control over the situation and finding out the truth for yourself. So, instead of wasting time arguing with the mother of the child about getting a DNA test, you just take the child and get the DNA test.

So simply put, it is about a man commiting an action, instead of arguing to get the woman to give permission for him to commit the action. One is far more efficient, simple, and no hassle to do than the other. Last, women fuss a lot about things. It is only an argument if you engage.

 

[Jaguar93]

 

[Shadow King]

I think you mistake my reason for stating you do not need to argue over it. It is not about avoiding strife. It is about avoiding unnecessary requests and arguments over the request, when you have the power to do the action anyway. It is about not being passive, and instead taking control over the situation and finding out the truth for yourself. So, instead of wasting time arguing with the mother of the child about getting a DNA test, you just take the child and get the DNA test.

So simply put, it is about a man commiting an action, instead of arguing to get the woman to give permission for him to commit the action. One is far more efficient, simple, and no hassle to do than the other. Last, women fuss a lot about things. It is only an argument if you engage.

Again, refusing to sign the certificate brings up the strife you wish to avoid.

 

[east]

They nationally banned paternity testing because the judges out there acquiesced to the women so they can cheat all willy nilly being married but can't deny the paternity of the children...

Paternity Testing Ban Upheld in France | International Biosciences UK

Paternity Testing has been banned in France for the past 15 years. Order Your Paternity Test from International Biosciences Now!

www.ibdna.com

paternity testing isn't banned in france, you're using a company selling paternity tests as your source lmao. they believe children have a right to medical privacy/not having unnecessary tests run on them so parents can order testing only for health reasons, otherwise you have to ask a judge to order a test. men are only stuck with child support if they say they're the father, or the mother claims he is and asks the court for a paternity test - otherwise nobody pays child support.

Legislation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Europe: a fragmented regulatory landscape - Journal of Community Genetics

Despite the increasing availability of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing, it is currently unclear how such services are regulated in Europe, due to the lack of EU or national legislation specifically addressing this issue. In this article, we provide an overview of laws that could...

link.springer.com

the funny thing is the reason you made up to justify a non-existent ban is the exact reason israel pretends theirs ancestry testing ban is for

Israel's 1965 Population Registry Law and 2000 Genetic Information Law, with few exceptions, prohibits DNA testing for the purpose of determining maternity and paternity out of fears that such a test could prove that a child is a mamzer - born of a relationship forbidden by Jewish law.

Israeli rabbinate under fire for pushing for DNA tests

JERUSALEM (RNS) — A rabbinical court has asked some immigrants to Israel to prove they are genetically Jewish before they can be married, a standard some say violates Judaism’s own definitions of Jewishness.

religionnews.com

 

[3rdWorld]

Ive been framed as being the father, and other brehs I know..too many infact.

 

[BaileyPark31]

Damn. Too old to start over. That man is hurting.

Nah

Look at deNiro

 

[bnew]

I'll never understand why dna test aren't mandatory.

I think they should be but it would likely lead to more social problems and the government doesn't want to pay an even larger financial assistance bill than they'd have to. its absolutely a policy that would lead to fewer two parent households. you have to consider that just because the first or second child might belong to a long term partner or husband, it doesn't mean the third one will be and that would likely be the catalyst for separation and a single parent household. on this matter, the government likely sees that ignorance is bliss since it maintains more social/family cohesion versus the truth.

the policy would bring about extreme negative effects very quickly, the number of women being murdered would skyrocket, and there would be a lot of children without mothers, foster kids, and familicide victims as well. men kill over these revelations.

 

[F*ckthemkids]

Insanity pleas are reserved for situations just like this.

 

[Vodun]

Because the cabal that actually runs the world understands that giving women full autonomy with little to no consequence disrupts natural order and stifles everyday men.

nikka slow down you spitting they not ready for that conversation!!

 

[King Poetic]

That’s why all states should require paternity tests at the birth and u not required to signed the birth certificate until the results period

 

[UnQuantized]

When you open your eyes to human nature is being a good man even worth it

 

[peppe]

At that age, and someone who is big on legacy, I’d kill

Imagine laying awake at night asking yourself why your kids are retarded. Only to find out it's because they aren't yours

At least you have confirmation it isn't because of you but damn 40 years

 

[Skooby]