Adam Silver: League looking at remedies for players requesting trades early in their contract

Do you think a remedy exists to prevent early trade details?


  • Total voters
    79
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
179,431
Reputation
22,444
Daps
586,577
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
Nope …you have to play 4 straight years and be an 8 year bet to even qualify for a NTC …it’s not just something everyone can “negotiate” that’s not how it works

The CBA. That's what we're discussing here. if owners say you need to "meet x requirements of games played and years on the contract" it's up to the players to negotiate extending the NTC to everyone at any time.
 

LEEeveryday

The-Coli Music Critic
Supporter
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
8,082
Reputation
4,066
Daps
30,453
Reppin
#LyricsMatter
I have a crazy idea. A consecutive 1st round pick should be added for the teams with these star players demanding a trade.

Like if Brooklyn would have the 20th pick in the next draft, then get the 21st as well and everyone else move down.

lol.. i dunno.
 

SchoolboyC

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
22,247
Reputation
3,870
Daps
94,626
does not matter. Welcome to business. You want a no trade clause then u negotiate that. NBA not the NFL. These contracts are guaranteed.

If owners want players to not be allowed to request trades then they should negotiate that. Until then, it’s perfectly legal :manny:

We can’t keep picking and choosing when trades get to be business, based on who initiates.
 

Left.A1

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
19,216
Reputation
714
Daps
51,433
The CBA. That's what we're discussing here. if owners say you need to "meet x requirements of games played and years on the contract" it's up to the players to negotiate extending the NTC to everyone at any time.
1. I wasn’t even talking to you …and the conversation I responded to was not about the CBA it was about the language inside of CURRENT players contracts


2. Of course players can negotiate whatever conditions they see fit during the actual CBA talks ..which is why in the event that the owners do try to make a hard push to remove players ability to privately request a trade ..on that grounds that those players made a “signed commitment”.. the players will easily be able to point out the hypocrisy of the ownerships stance by referencing the several players that are routinely traded by owners after also giving a “signed commitment” to those players …highlighting the lack of principle that the ownership contingency has in making such a request :mjlol:
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
179,431
Reputation
22,444
Daps
586,577
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
If owners want players to not be allowed to request trades then they should negotiate that. Until then, it’s perfectly legal :manny:

We can’t keep picking and choosing when trades get to be business, based on who initiates.

is that not what the thread is about? The title of the thread is "Adam Silver wants remedies" and a bunch of posters got hot. Oh well. CBA is coming. Everyone will have their chance.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
29,889
Reputation
4,711
Daps
66,380
Obviously you don't if you believe contracts aren't meant to hold weight :mjlol:
I didn’t say contracts hold no weight. I asked you to name how frequently ownership looks at a contract as something binding them to you? You had no answer. You said it doesn’t matter. So if you are free to seek to trade me at any point, why am I not free to express that I don’t want to play for you? You’re just not used to the idea of an “employee” having any leverage. Harden didn’t sit out, he just played uninspired and that’s no different than management benching players who can play because they see no future for them with their organization and intend to move them. It works both ways.
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
12,643
Reputation
-541
Daps
21,561
I didn’t say contracts hold no weight. I asked you to name how frequently ownership looks at a contract as something binding them to you? You had no answer. You said it doesn’t matter. So if you are free to seek to trade me at any point, why am I not free to express that I don’t want to play for you? You’re just not used to the idea of an “employee” having any leverage. Harden didn’t sit out, he just played uninspired and that’s no different than management benching players who can play because they see no future for them with their organization and intend to move them. It works both ways.
I agree except players are not employees, they are partners that get 51% of league revenues.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
29,889
Reputation
4,711
Daps
66,380
Are you a professional athlete or entertainer?
Your question doesn’t change the point. A high level executive or employee gets equity because they’re valued that highly and their compensation is tied to the company’s performance just like an NBA player. The NBA players are members of a Union that collectively bargain for the wages and benefits of NBA employees. The fact that their wages are based on revenue sharing does not make them any less employees. It makes them employees with a strong union contract. They get a weekly check from their organization just like a regular employee.
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
12,643
Reputation
-541
Daps
21,561
Your question doesn’t make sense. A high level executive or employee gets equity because they’re valued that highly and their compensation is tied to the company’s performance just like an NBA player. The NBA players are members of a Union that collectively bargain for the wages and benefits of NBA employees. The fact that their wages are based on revenue sharing does not make them any less employees. It makes them employees with a strong union contract. They get a weekly check from their organization just like a regular employee.
So Lebron james is an employee for the Lakers like all the office workers and stadium employees for the team?
 
Top