That’s fair and I misunderstood your point. 100 agree that you do have to do consistent work in some form and you just can diet down to have developed abs.
All good sir
I wanna get your thoughts on a theory I have and have observed.
I listen to a few Bodybuilding podcasts, and have followed Bodybuilding for a few years.
I always download the Q N A ones or when they have a former Mr Olympia, Arnold Classic etc or trainers.
What I have noticed even in modern building, the core/abs is one of the most neglected part, it's not given significance... Back in the golden era of 90s Mr Olympia's, no matter how big and great your physique was, you had to have at very least a flat stomach, and somewhat visible abs... Dorian Yates Ronnie Coleman for example are not famous for their abs, BUT even they still needed to have a decent core.
The reason I point this bodybuilding trend out is coz I know most gym etiquette and conventional methods today are DIRECTLY taken from bodybuilding.
Even terminology like "super setting" "pre workout" "leg day "" Compound movements " and many other gym lingo is straight from bodybuilders..
The low body fat, 3 times a week for abs logic comes from Bodybuilding, basically to win a Mr Olympia, abs are not gonna determine whether or not you win, it's gonna be legs, back, arms, chest, shoulder etc etc Bodybuilder stomachs have to be just "good enough" (relative to their ridiculous high standards)....
I've heard a lot of gym myths and theories that are directly taken from bodybuilders over the years, and people don't seem to understand is that 98% of elite bodybuilders are born with superior genetics AND (100%)on gear... So almost EVERYTHING that works for THEM will not translate well for you/us regular brehs who are training to be healthy, look good.
A classic Bodybuilding notion that's been adopted by regular gym guys is the "training to failure"... When you work/lift with an isolated muscle e.g. Bicep, till you're physically unable to do anything with it... This is a HORRENDOUS thing to do to your muscles if youre a regular breh and you simply do NOT need it, to achieve your ideal look... Bodybuilders do it to literally create NEW mind-muscle connections, they are trying to push their body BEYOND the bodies actually pshyaical limits
Another bodybuilder notion I've seen is the concept of training "chest and back" on one day, them arms and core the other day, then leg day etc
Another is the "anti cardio" trope, again, Kai Greene or Phil Heath is not gonna be doing a gang of cardio and after you've built THAT kind of muscles over THAT long of a period of time, you burn fat like an actual machine. Those guys bodies are not "human"... They are just freaks of nature.
But a retailer breh should be doing cardio and sprints, every other day or daily, or oscillate between sprinting one day and jogging the other.
Most bodybuilders train 2 - 3 times a day. Their entire day is centered around eating, recovering(sleeping, gear) and training... So them dedicating entire sessions on one or 2 big muscle groups is almost irrelevant coz with may a 72 hour cycle, they've actually trained the entire body, whereas if you do legs on Tuesdays only, it won't work for you.
I see a lot of BODYBUILDER conventional methods being used, encouraged by regular brehs, with average genetics and no steroid/gear use or even a Mr Olympia, Arnold Classic etc context to their look.
I believe that ALL brehs pretty much wanna look more or less like Michael B Jordan or be skinny ripped (can't think of a famous lean ripped black actor)... Both looks can be achieved without MOST of the bodybuilding methods.
Do we really want legs like Dorian Yates or the sheer size of Ronnie.
I follow a lot of the nerdier side of Bodybuilding, and I have observed that Bodybuilding is a fine art/science for the insane.. Regular brehs can learn a lot about sleeping patterns, stretching, counting calories etc from bodybuilders, but a lot of that stuff they do is HIGHLY specialized and EXTREMELY specific to them.
It's long winded, but I'd love to hear anyone's take on it.
Again I'm open to being wrong and corrected.