Aaron Hernandez questioned by police in homicide probe (Update: Found guilty of first degree murder)

[mson]

Mom read a nice statement

 

[kp404]

Yeah, when someone says vague shyt like "the constitution" in a criminal case, you know they're just reaching and they can't compete in an actual legal context.

Did you actually read the postThen you don't @ me like a passive aggressive bytch; That word wasn't even part of the subject of the post, clown; Be a man and @ me next time so I can embarrass you again

 

[the artist known az]

Yeah, when someone says vague shyt like "the constitution" in a criminal case, you know they're just reaching and they can't compete in an actual legal context.

It's all good, I ain't sweating it

 

[kp404]

Validation by a few peers doesn't validate the statement.

Yet you can't argue against what I said though; sad kid still got bytch feelings for me

 

[Stack Money]

nikka been sittin there calmly lookin at the Judge and Jury wit the faces the whole time like he already plottin their murders


Its bout to be a whole lot more bodies pilin up behind this.

Trust me, when you've been having to rationalize spending your life in prison for over a year, you will not be visibly devastated upon confirmation. Especially if you were denied bail and had to sit in jail the entire time seeing other guys with similar cases get hit with natural life. The last thing you do is give the people persecuting you the satisfaction of seeing you be emotional.

Thats why you hear cacs get mad and talk about body language and bullshyt when someone denies them that opportunity to say "Hey, look at him cry y'all. "

These butthurt cacs are a prime example of the bolded -

 

[kp404]

It's all good, I ain't sweating it

Yes you areYou still responding to this shyt like a kid who got bullied. "I'm ok, I ain't sweating it"

 

[FreshAIG]

I'd be scared for my fukking life

"This wasn't a good idea" - Aaron Hernandez

 

[the artist known az]

:hartwtf:Do you know how trials work? It was the prosecution's job to prove without reasonable doubt that he killed Odin Lloyd. No witnesses, no weapon. Motive was muddy. That's not enough evidence for this verdict.

Someone posted in Mass. the prosecution didn't have to prove he pulled the trigger. Not to mention they have him on his on surveillance coming back home right after the time of the murder. But they didn't have enough evidence

Based on how the Constitution is supposed to work (it doesn't), its innocent until proven guilty; he obviously didn't get a fair trial, but let's be honest: based on the evidence presented, he should not have been found guilty here by that jury in this trial because of lack of evidence; they never proved he killed him; there is no gun, no witnesses, and the motive was thrown out of court. System is indeed, broken

That's why I responded that The U.S. Constitution doesn't have much to do with a state case being that they have their own Constitution which they use to charge and try a case. Blame the system when his own lawyers only called 4 witnesses & admitted he was there

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Did you actually read the postThen you don't @ me like a passive aggressive bytch; That word wasn't even part of the subject of the post, clown; Be a man and @ me next time so I can embarrass you again

Stick to watching First 48 & Law and Order

 

[kp404]

Stick to watching First 48 & Law and Order

Not my type of showsCome to the Film Room and you'll see what I like, poser

 

[kp404]

Someone posted in Mass. the prosecution didn't have to prove he pulled the trigger. Not to mention they have him on his on surveillance coming back home right after the time of the murder. But they didn't have enough evidence


That's why I responded that The U.S. Constitution doesn't have much to do with a state case being that they have their own Constitution which they use to charge and try a case. Blame the system when his own lawyers only called 4 witnesses & admitted he was there

Why are you still talking about the Constitution? Read my post again breh, please. I only used that word to point to how the entire system, fed, state, etc. is fukked up; the system is fukked up when the best evidence is thrown out and he is still convicted on circumstantial evidence, which is ridiculous and you can;'t argue against that; like I said, you have very poor reading comprehension. Read in context, kid, then come back to this thread

 

[the artist known az]

Why are you still talking about the Constitution? Read my post again breh, please. I only used that word to point to how the entire system, fed, state, etc. is fukked up; like I said, you have very poor reading comprehension. Read in context, kid, then come back to this thread

You said he didn't get a "fair trial". I was merely stating that the Constitution had nothing with this case because every state has their own elements to prove guilt. It was also in response to saying that they didn't have the murder weapon. I said it was circumstantial evidence that convicted him but again you was saying it was "unfair"

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Yet you can't argue against what I said though; sad kid still got bytch feelings for me

Except, the evidence was overwhelming.

Seems like this is the first case you've ever seen.

Just another lost fatherless nikka sticking up for athletes and pretending the justice system is unfair because your fantasy football draft team is fukked up

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

You said he didn't get a "fair trial". I was merely stating that the Constitution had nothing with this case because every state has their own elements to prove guilt. It was also in response to saying that they didn't have the murder weapon. I said it was circumstantial evidence that convicted him but again you was saying it was "unfair"

Exactly. @kp404 getting his rants mixed up

 

[Tony D'Amato]

Not my type of showsCome to the Film Room and you'll see what I like, poser

U like trash