Aaron Hernandez questioned by police in homicide probe (Update: Found guilty of first degree murder)

Slystallion

Slystallion

Live to Strive
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
13,106
Reputation
-10,422
Daps
17,418
i don't know about charging the wife. Its enough the kids are losing their father...their mother too? That doesn't seem right. She probably did what she could to save the family after the fact and most likely didn't approve of the murder but loved her husband and family and wanted to protect him

To me she's not a murderer and just a person in a difficult moral qualm. Its the dilemma of protecting your loved one from death from the law practically or turning them in. Which is why its best when someone does dirt not to tell their loved ones at all to keep them away from harm
 
Raquinotj

Raquinotj

#NBATwitter #NBAReddit #6ixRings #PatsNation
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,047
Reputation
-1,353
Daps
54,045
Reppin
City of champions BAWSTON
LeflaurLeflahEshkoshka said:
Why don't you look at the charges, evidence, and understand reasonable doubt before you comment. It comes down to did he pull the trigger. He is the only one of the three in the case facing the 1st degree murder charge as well as weapon charges. The other two are facing accessory to murder charges and weapons charges. They don't have concrete evidence on exactly who pulled the trigger and they don't have a murder weapon. His boy who is talking was asleep in the car at the time and can't confirm AH pulled the trigger, and the other guy isn't talking. That's reasonable doubt right there. You need to have a burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt to convict.

The DA is banking his whole case on that not only did AH orchestrate the whole thing, but he PULLED the trigger, hence the 1st degree murder charge. If the jury feels that there is not enough evidence to suggest that AH pulled the trigger and was only present, they're not gonna convict him of 1st degree murder - which is what he is charged with, he isn't charged with being an accessory to murder. All those little pieces of evidence don't mean he PULLED the trigger. Destroying the cameras only means he tampered with a police investigation. And text messages can be disputed and argued by any lawyer.

And why you bringing up OJ like that's the only murder case in the world. People get off on technicalities/lack of evidence all the time.
Click to expand...


Wallace Most likely WONT talk, AH paying his lawyer and the guy Lived off AH and was described as his "Right Hand Man", Lived in his house and all, I think AH and Wallace gonna say that Ortiz was drugged and killed Lloyd.

http://www.providencejournal.com/br...-wallace-called-hernandezs-right-hand-man.ece

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/07/05/hernandez-may-be-paying-for-wallaces-lawyer/

If Hernandez is in fact paying for Wallace’s lawyer, expect a joint defense agreement. Those are common in mob cases. The prosecution will probably be able to call Wallace and treat him as hostile from the start.
Wallace would be in position to dispute Ortiz’s testimony without exposing Hernandez to cross examination. That’s his value to Hernandez and probably why he’s picking up the tab.
 
M

Mr210

Banned
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
23,215
Reputation
-7,878
Daps
18,420
Reppin
NULL
Slystallion said:
i don't know about charging the wife. Its enough the kids are losing their father...their mother too? That doesn't seem right. She probably did what she could to save the family after the fact and most likely didn't approve of the murder but loved her husband and family and wanted to protect him

To me she's not a murderer and just a person in a difficult moral qualm. Its the dilemma of protecting your loved one from death from the law practically or turning them in. Which is why its best when someone does dirt not to tell their loved ones at all to keep them away from harm
Click to expand...


no excuse, she is about to go down as well
 
godkiller

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,700
Daps
35,650
Reppin
NULL
King P said:
He's not Mexican :aicmon:
Click to expand...

You probably think that because Hernandez is Puerto Rican, he is much different to a Mexican, but that's wrong because Hernandez looks like a Mexican. Many PRs are just transplanted Mexicans breh. Victor Cruz is th exception, not the rule.:smugfavre:
 
Last edited:
Jax

Jax

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
36,636
Reputation
3,816
Daps
54,846
Reppin
#Targset,#Heatgang,#Byrdgang
greenhousegases said:
You probably think that because Hernandez is Puerto Rican, he is much different to a Mexican, but that's wrong because Hernandez looks like a Mexican. Many PRs are just transplanted Mexicans breh. Victor Cruz is th exception, not the rule.:smugfavre:
Click to expand...
You're all confused, you must be a cac or something. You're confusing cubans with mexicans and puerto ricans with haitians. :beli:
 
godkiller

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,700
Daps
35,650
Reppin
NULL
Jax said:
You're all confused, you must be a cac or something.
Click to expand...

Chill with the inane accusations. I was just defending my Mexican label. Deal wit the facts or not at all. :leostare:

You're confusing cubans with mexicans and puerto ricans with haitians. :beli:
Click to expand...

Read what I posted again and tell me where I made the Cuban-Mexican and PR-Haitian comparison. :comeon:
 
Ayo

Ayo

SOHH 2001
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,040
Reputation
689
Daps
19,026
Reppin
Back in MIA
LeflaurLeflahEshkoshka said:
Why don't you look at the charges, evidence, and understand reasonable doubt before you comment. It comes down to did he pull the trigger. He is the only one of the three in the case facing the 1st degree murder charge as well as weapon charges. The other two are facing accessory to murder charges and weapons charges. They don't have concrete evidence on exactly who pulled the trigger and they don't have a murder weapon. His boy who is talking was asleep in the car at the time and can't confirm AH pulled the trigger, and the other guy isn't talking. That's reasonable doubt right there. You need to have a burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt to convict.

The DA is banking his whole case on that not only did AH orchestrate the whole thing, but he PULLED the trigger, hence the 1st degree murder charge. If the jury feels that there is not enough evidence to suggest that AH pulled the trigger and was only present, they're not gonna convict him of 1st degree murder - which is what he is charged with, he isn't charged with being an accessory to murder. All those little pieces of evidence don't mean he PULLED the trigger. Destroying the cameras only means he tampered with a police investigation. And text messages can be disputed and argued by any lawyer.

And why you bringing up OJ like that's the only murder case in the world. People get off on technicalities/lack of evidence all the time.
Click to expand...
Why don't you look at my previous posts where I already addressed that matter?

Are Hernandez's attorneys ready to support the prosecutors evidence that he was at the scene? Thats the only way they are going to cast doubt on the triggerman.

If his team is ready to not contest the fact that Ahern was at the scene, and they are ready to imply that he was there but wasn't the trigger man, then they are going to need a witness to present these sets of facts. Whos that witness going to be? Ahern? His boys? How likely is that though? Those are the only 3 people that could present those facts.

Not to mention that all of that evidence now goes uncontested. The cell phone tower evidence, the receipts, the timeline, all confirmed by the defense and uncontested. All placing Hernandez at the scene and part of the conspiracy. Now facts. That sounds like a fukking retarded defense to me.

You can't just submit cockamamie scenarios to the jury without testimony or evidence to back it up. Without eye witness testimony that scenario never makes it to the jury. One of the three men would have to take the stand. Ahern would have to implicate himself in being at the murder scene.

Understand how it works? You CSI watching nikkas are killing me. Everyone is a defense attorney nowadays. shyt is hilarious.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top