Same goes for Caribbean Americans as it pertains to African Americans.
They don’t fully identify with us so don’t do it when it’s convenient for you to do so.
#AAGang how do you feel about African bed wenches eating off the feminist hustle?
- Thread starter Trajan
- Start date
They don’t fully identify with us so don’t do it when it’s convenient for you to do so.
That makes no sense...what you are saying. I found it funny when the topic of defining AA from black cultures there is a definite line but it comes to race than there is all these theories about being a racial construct.Some africans and Caribbeans are confused about there ethnic background. I see it on the coli everyday. Claim AA then start talking about Jollf rice and plantains in another thread.
As a non AA I have no problem not being considered AA...I am not. But a non AA black person would have American cultural attributes due to being raised here. It doesn't change their ethnicity.
As for feminism it is not as new a concept as you men think. There were feminists in all societies predating America it just was not labeled that.
There is a Kenyan village in Kenya of women who separated of men to prevent the marriage of young girls. Many cultural practices that were practiced past are backwards need to die.
There have always been men or women who rebelled against the cultural norms of their time.
Does this go both ways?
Indiglow Meta (R$G)
Ultra.
Indiglow Meta (R$G)
Ultra.
There are no masculinist black men going to Africa, telling brehs to "get your bytch".
IllmaticDelta
Veteran
lord
They didn't sell their own kin. They sold their war prisoners.
Some of them did sell their kin tho.
OP c00ned out a topic title to create rabble. brehs take heed, they say "Africans have no say in AA matters." but then we go "Let's go reperate back to Africa, we love you africa." naaah can't have it both ways. I fully embrace black women of all locations to congregate and discuss subjects of the higher minds, it is truly well needed in future building, but ONLY if not at the expense of the black man. but Together, would be nice. Atleast one would think? ? ?
Who are you?
Not every black man wants to repatriate.
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
So when I see brehs talking about why black women are part of a movement ([white] feminist) that never involved or considered them in the first place, they're really talking about non-AA black women? 
Hoodoo Child
The Urban Legend
Thank you for breaking this down. Been tryin' to explain this to people most of my adult lifena...
Some indigenous nations such as the Chickasaws and the Choctaws began to embrace the concept that African bodies were property, and equated blackness to hereditary inferiority.[7] In either case “The system of racial classification and hierarchy took shape as Europeans and Euro-Americans sought to subordinate and exploit Native Americans' and Africans' land, bodies, and labor.[1] Whether strategically or racially motivated the slave trade promoted interactions between the Five Civilized Tribes and African Slaves which led to new power relations among Native societies, elevating groups such as the Five Civilized Tribes to power and serving, ironically, to preserve native order.[8]
The writer William Loren Katz suggests that Native Americans treated their slaves better than European Americans in the Southeast.[9] Federal Agent Hawkins considered the form of slavery the tribes were practicing to be inefficient because the majority didn't practice chattel slavery.[10] Travelers reported enslaved Africans "in as good circumstances as their masters."[9] A white Indian Agent, Douglas Cooper, upset by the Native Americans failure to practice a harsher form of bondage, insisted that Native Americans invite white men to live in their villages and "control matters."[9] One observer in the early 1840s wrote, "The full-blood Indian rarely works himself and but few of them make their slaves work. A slave among wild Indians is almost as free as his owner."[11] Frederick Douglass stated in 1850,
The slave finds more of the milk of human kindness in the bosom of the savage Indian, than in the heart of his Christian master.[5]
...and it was mixed blood w/white, mestizos who were the enforcers-owners, not full blown indians
Holmes Colbert, a prominent leader in the Chickasaw Nation and the owner of several enslaved African-Americans (Wikimedia Commons)
Peter Pitchlynn, or “Hat-choo-tuck-nee,” a Choctaw chief and later tribal delegate to Washington (LC-USZ62-58502, Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, Washington, D.C.)
Black Slaves, Indian Masters: Slavery, Emancipation, and Citizenship in the Native American South, by Barbara Krauthamer (2013)
