I’ve “refuted” damn near everything you said. It seems you don’t know shyt about shyt,
You havent refuted anything. Go ahead address his interview. I'll wait to hear your thoughts and analysis.
No one cares if he has legal representation and that one interview doesn’t even prove he does or doesn’t
Your disregard for whether he does or doesn't let's us know that you either don't care about his legal representation status or at least have doubt.
What should we take away from this interview?