Funny to see men laugh at these single women, that means you’re single too 
45% Of Women Are Expected To Be Single And Childless By 2030
- Thread starter Duke Wy Lin
- Start date
Wargames
One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
doesn’t sound like a problem to me.
I’m gonna eat
The fact that there’s San People and WaTusi people shows the genetic diversity of Africa as a whole and since Humans moved all over the earth fairly quickly there may have been some connections.
They found Neatherthal bones as far south as Israel.
But to answer your question the desire for genetic diversity aka strange would seem to explain why Bucking and wenching is so popular in Africa.
There’s a wanted Dutch Drug Dealer who popped up at a wedding arm in arm with the President of Sierra Leone’s Daughter.
Some random cac manged to smash the daughter of the Sierra Leonean President.
Same thing about women roasting incels.Funny to see men laugh at these single women, that means you’re single too
Again kinda explains the desire for Hoe Phases in women.
also being a career woman sounds good at first but women want an off ramp and a suucessful husband is the key to her job taking a backseat to her raising children.
It’s not a Problem now but when the birth rate falls to South Korean levels it starts to effect the economy.
That being said the Japanese birth rate finally increased about .03% last year so maybe the decline isnt permanent.
The women at the tope of the corporate ladder are also married with children. It is part of the unoffical requirement for both men and women.
The childless 45 something is stuck for higher promotion because the family people are above in status and need more meny/vacations/advancement et cie.
I really see the 45% childless women and even more in the 30-40 year bracket. They are all miserable, overworked, prone to illness and depression.
Collegues with kids, family have a resilence and purpose they lack. Hoeing is a fraction of their adult life. The rest is difficult.
I don't even add the economic struggle to buy a house, going or vacation with a single income in 2025.
Wargames
One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
America wants people to have more children. Financially support people by covering childbirth and child care cost and give parents the ability to have more of a work life balance.
That’s the problem People want racehorse super babies instead of just having children the problem has been explained over and over
animals survive and thrive when they have the most kids not the best kids rats produce like crazy and we can’t kill them yet we do everything we can to get Pandas to reproduce and they still dont.
There’s a reason humans have such a high sex drive
Kevin Samuels talked about this and said as a corporate guy he saw the problem.
At the end of the day being on the C-suite track sounds good but most people can’t or won’t do what it takes to get there. So having a supportive family instead of cut throat colleagues starts to make sense.
Forget the idea that even though the modern urban elite all lives a certain way and spends money frivolously it’s still way less than a middle class or rich family spends on children.
Not the mention the good genetic material that doesn’t get passed on.
Wargames
One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Yeah but from an economic problem if it’s easier for people to have and support children they will. The child birth rate is low because there is no incentive to have children you cant afford on purpose.
So unless they are going to get rid of contraceptives and force everyone to take prep to avoid HIV the childbirth rate will stay low.
You’re believing standard hoe babble.
People have been throwing money at women for years even paying for IVF treatments Israel goes as far as retrieving deal soldiers to get their Sperm and all the Global urban elite birth rates are in the toilet.
Meanwhile in Niger women have 7 babies per capita.
Brolic
High Value Poster
You hit the nail on the head. A lot of professional women I’ve dated are working 50-60 hours a week, still have student loans, and aren’t really saving for retirement.
All that working just to blow it on rent for an overpriced apartment in a HCOL and excessive vacationing.
They don’t even realize they’d be in a much better position just going 50/50 or 60/40 with a good man because social media told them it’s better to be single if a man’s not paying all the bills.
NobodyReally
Superstar
There's no data to support what you're saying women without children are less depressed and live longer. They also have more disposable income because duh..... Like this isn't rocket science. Women with children have to work and they have take care of the children. It wears them down physically, psychologically and health wise. Now if the partnership was more equal that probably would improve but it doesn't. Women with children are the ones who are overworked, depressed, and have less disposable income. Now childless men in their later lives are really bad off. Maybe that's why you guys are projecting onto women what they may be going through, but they aren't going through the same things because the stakes are higher for women with children, especially if the man doesn't feel he needs to contribute anything other than money. I'm not pulling this out of my ass. This has been studied for decades. Here's a systematic literature review of hundreds of empirical studies conducted over a decade. It's also from a top peer reviewed journal. In other words this is most of the research on this topic.
Parenthood, Childlessness, and Well-Being: A Life Course Perspective - PMC
This article reviews recent research (1999 – 2009) on the effects of parenthood on wellbeing. We use a life course framework to consider how parenting and childlessness influence well-being throughout the adult life course. We place particular ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Generally, childless young adults report better well-being than parents (Nomaguchi & Milkie, 2003), although one study found that childlessness in young adulthood may be stressful in the context of thwarted fertility intentions, especially for women with lower family income (McQuillan, Greil, White, & Jacob, 2003). As for childlessness at midlife, Koropeckyj-Cox, Pienta, and Brown (2007) analyzed national, cross-sectional data to compare the well-being of childless women and mothers in their 50s and found that childlessness was not associated with worse psychological outcomes in midlife. It was women who became mothers early in the life course who experienced lower wellbeing—largely because of marital disruption and fewer socioeconomic resources.
Several recent studies have explicitly compared the well-being of parents and the childless in later life. This issue is more relevant now than in the past because of increasing longevity, lower marriage rates, and increasing numbers of childless individuals—a combination of factors that may contribute to greater isolation and distress in older populations (Zhang & Hayward, 2001). Zhang and Hayward analyzed a national cross-section of Americans age 70 and older and concluded that any effects of childlessness on well-being were apparent only within the context of marital status and gender. Childlessness was associated with higher rates of depression and loneliness, but only for unmarried men.