the funny thing is that they literally could have painted them white. 
and deliberately chose not to
and deliberately chose not to
4,000 year old painting unearth in Egytian tomb
- Thread starter Premeditated
- Start date
Boolean
APIDTA
Americans and their insistence on "brown skin == black person" is very off-putting
So Indians are black people now? What about them arabs with brown skin then? they black too ??
People need to use their fukking heads more. But I guess this is what happens when people's only source of information is the internet and blog posts
Its clear egyptians werent cacs, but that doesnt mean they were black either
"hey, he/she is brownskinned and doesnt have a razor sharp nose like a cac....so he/shes gotta be black"
im tired of black race being a dumping ground for anything not considered a cac
you a grown ass man being this dumb on purpose sad
I wish I had a time machine to kick it with some of the ancient egpytian breh & brehettes. 
null
...
Americans and their insistence on "brown skin == black person" is very off-putting
So Indians are black people now? What about them arabs with brown skin then? they black too ??
1. Blacks are the only people that are indigenous to every continent.
i.e. The first Europeans were Black, the first Asians were black, the first Australasians were Black etc.
2. Black is a yt invented term used to describe people with a certain phenotype irrespective of whether they are any more descended from Africa than Caucasians or not.
Jonah Lomu for example.
It might be easier for you if you think of Blacks as being the indigenous man and everyone else a visitor. Then it will start to make some sense. If you want to blame someone for the inexactness of the term Black in terms of its common usage then look elsewhere.
3. Being the first man, Black people are the most diverse. You might be familiar with and limit yourself to the West African subset but that is not representative of the entire group.
4. Ancient Egyptians were Black horn Africans - like Sudanese, like Ethiopians.
Menes / Narmer was an ancient Egyptian king of the Early Dynastic Period,[1] circa 3100-3050 BC. He probably was the successor to the Protodynastic king Ka, or possibly Scorpion. Some consider him the unifier of Egypt and founder of the First Dynasty, and in turn the first king of a unified Egypt.
Narmar:
The point is NOT that Egypt wasn't White, the question is why do people bend over backwards to make excuses for those that lie about history.
From Disney, to Fox, to popular history, to school textbooks, to educational institutions, to modern Egypt itself.
null
...
Egypt is in Africa you moron. Those people you posted are in Asia and America.Americans and their insistence on "brown skin == black person" is very off-putting
So Indians are black people now? What about them arabs with brown skin then? they black too ??
People need to use their fukking heads more. But I guess this is what happens when people's only source of information is the internet and blog posts
Its clear egyptians werent cacs, but that doesnt mean they were black either
"hey, he/she is brownskinned and doesnt have a razor sharp nose like a cac....so he/shes gotta be black
im tired of black race being a dumping ground for anything not considered a cac
null
...
So everybody on this planet is black then since we're all of black origin. There are no other races, we're all black people
might as well bush this thread then
In that case we are all Amoeba.
You easily exposed yourself as a cracker you know that?So?? whats your point? non-blacks are not a thing in Africa? you really believe Africa is just black people only? or are you one of those idiots who think the word "Africa" is synonymous with "Black"?
man plz
. No black person would be this opposed to news of ancient Black Egypt. Everything you're saying is easily dismissed and is elementary arguments that can be proven wrong culturally, linguistically and there is DNA and anthropological evidence as well to back it up.@Swagnificent
Last edited:
The truth always reveals itself, can’t erase original man. cacs in their feelings of course 
null
...
Americans and their insistence on "brown skin == black person" is very off-putting
So Indians are black people now? What about them arabs with brown skin then? they black too ??
People need to use their fukking heads more. But I guess this is what happens when people's only source of information is the internet and blog posts
Its clear egyptians werent cacs, but that doesnt mean they were black either
"hey, he/she is brownskinned and doesnt have a razor sharp nose like a cac....so he/shes gotta be black
im tired of black race being a dumping ground for anything not considered a cac
Who invited this cac?
ReportedAmericans and their insistence on "brown skin == black person" is very off-putting
So Indians are black people now? What about them arabs with brown skin then? they black too ??
People need to use their fukking heads more. But I guess this is what happens when people's only source of information is the internet and blog posts
Its clear egyptians werent cacs, but that doesnt mean they were black either
"hey, he/she is brownskinned and doesnt have a razor sharp nose like a cac....so he/shes gotta be black
im tired of black race being a dumping ground for anything not considered a cac
Egypt wasnt the only ancient advanced civilization in Africa simpleton
You only have this elementary and juvenile argument that brown skin doesn't mean someone is of african descent. How do you feel knowing that there is DNA evidence proving that a lot of Ancient Egyptians were African? and don't even bother posting that misleading DNA article showing Ancient Egyptians being closely related to europeans because that shyt is too much to go over for simpletons like you.dont be an idiot. never opposed anything other than you dumb notion of brown skin =/= black. that is why you have confused half-breeds running around claiming to be black. Now thats what im against
Also, let's play with your logic, you think brown doesn't mean black because color? Well for one the color schemes in Ancient Egypt is symbolic.
it doesn't have to do with actual depictions of the race.
So I guess there's a secret blue race of people in Ancient Egypt huh?
That's symbolism. Red is usually for Men while women are usually painted yellow in Ancient Egypt.
King Tut
Fighting Nubians that are also shown as some red/black. This here is for propaganda by insinuating that the colors used here are to represent the races.
Meanwhile his statue clearly looks black
To further show you how stupid this logic can be is using your logic, the west African kingdom of Dahomey had artwork depicting red people so I guess they weren't black either right?
Because to you, this color means they aren't black so now you have to apply the same logic and say these "red/brown" people don't mean black and clearly they are indisputably "true negro" aka Sub Saharan African.
You cacs with this "Brown doesn't mean BLACK!!" rhetoric are so unbelievably stupid. As if "black" people's skin are literally black and not BROWN.
If MJ was on that painting you'd say he's not really "Black" because "brown skin" doesn't mean Black.
Don't even quote me no more, negged and ignored.
Just
the fukk outta here.
Last edited:
Americans and their insistence on "brown skin == black person" is very off-putting
So Indians are black people now? What about them arabs with brown skin then? they black too ??
People need to use their fukking heads more. But I guess this is what happens when people's only source of information is the internet and blog posts
Its clear egyptians werent cacs, but that doesnt mean they were black either
"hey, he/she is brownskinned and doesnt have a razor sharp nose like a cac....so he/shes gotta be black
im tired of black race being a dumping ground for anything not considered a cac
. Africa is the birthplace of civilization....negged CAC