Sorry friend the “you need to have boxed to analyze boxing” is a dead dead dead argument, only used by people who are desperate. For example I’ve been in the ring, @Yuzo at one point in his life was a trainer, and we both whiffed on this one. Does that make our boxing analysis any less sound? No. In fact I’m sure if you went up and down the list of people you get boxing news/stuff from, many of them have never boxed before.
Have you ever stepped in a ring? Man is where the posters that know real boxing. Errol Is gonna FUKK Bud Crawford up its more of a chance he get knocked out than Mikey. Break his ass down and make him quit. One day yall gonna realize Errol is just different. Yall always say what some fighter gonna do to him how they so good in this and that..but never what Erol gonna do to said fighter. Bud is good.. Errol will be an all time great
Mikey went for the check, point blank...and why not?
Spence is #2 p4p right now behind Canelo to me. If the Spence that fought Mikey last night fights Crawford.....welll if they fight
Mikey didn't chase Spence for the check
He believed the critics and goofies who constantly diminish Spence's skillset
Mikey went in the ring believing Spence was a bruiser with little head movement
Mikey thot him being much better than Brook, he'd counter Spence aplenty
But Mikey left the ring knowing he was dominated in every facet
Spence completely nullified his offense and was still going for the KO
Mikey was left helpless
We haven't seen that done to a legit top 3 P4P fighter in a looooong time
Spence gotta be #1
Canelo is a drug cheat who hasn't decisively won a big fight
No one on the P4P list has looked as dominant vs a high level of comp like Spence has
Anybody can be beaten on any given day. Keith Thurman can give him a run,
nobody knows anything we all take the knowledge we have and make guesses based on our experience etc and if you think you know more than everyone else eventually you'll meet a nikka in the ring that will learn your ass
god help if you if that nikka is a body puncher
It's always the dudes who are barely seen in here that wanna throw around "you never boxed before"shyt. SmhSorry friend the “you need to have boxed to analyze boxing” is a dead dead dead argument, only used by people who are desperate. For example I’ve been in the ring, @Yuzo at one point in his life was a trainer, and we both whiffed on this one. Does that make our boxing analysis any less sound? No. In fact I’m sure if you went up and down the list of people you get boxing news/stuff from, many of them have never boxed before.
#factsonly
This your own insecurities fam speak for yourself
Ok so I got high as fukk and rewatched the fight. This time I really focused on spence. I had em at an A+ on first watch, but after a rewatch I gotta move em to an A-. I overlooked some of the mistakes on first watch because it was such a domination. But you can still see that spence has some major flaws. He still loads up too much on some of his punches and throws super wide at times. A fast puncher would be able to come right up the middle and tag him when he does this. And he still has a tendency of leaning in and becoming off balanced when he throws. Especially when he goes to the body. He leaves himself WIDE open to an overhand right. Mikey just wasn't fast enough to exploit that. It would be a different story vs crawford. Even Thurman. Spence still has to tighten up that defense something serious. The wide punches and leaning in could be disastrous vs a bigger guy with elite speed.While I agree Packeyows fall off has been greatly exaggerated I don't think he'd fair as well against Spence as you do...Spence size advantage, specifically his reach is a big problem, one that Mikey couldn't overcome and hes a better technical boxer than Packeyow...
While Manny handspeed is still blistering he is in his 40s...He will need alot of movement to get inside of Spence jab and it's been pretty apparent he doesn't have that bounce in his step anymore...I think the longer this fight goes on, the more it will mirror what saw Saturday night...
Ok so I got high as fukk and rewatched the fight. This time I really focused on spence. I had em at an A+ on first watch, but after a rewatch I gotta move em to an A-. I overlooked some of the mistakes on first watch because it was such a domination. But you can still see that spence has some major flaws. He still loads up too much on some of his punches and throws super wide at times. A fast puncher would be able to come right up the middle and tag him when he does this. And he still has a tendency of leaning in and becoming off balanced when he throws. Especially when he goes to the body. He leaves himself WIDE open to an overhand right. Mikey just wasn't fast enough to exploit that. It would be a different story vs crawford. Even Thurman. Spence still has to tighten up that defense something serious. The wide punches and leaning in could be disastrous vs a bigger guy with elite speed.
After rewatch I think I still got tcraw as the favorite. His hand speed and counter punching will be the difference imo. Tcraw makes you pay for damn near every mistake you make in the ring. Still a 50-50 fight because we've never seen tcraw in there with a huge guy who won't stop. But I think Crawfords has the right combination of skills to exploit spences flaws.
And yea the main thing with the Pacquiao fight is spences length. That's why I think it'll be a battle of length vs speed. But I just think manny has the experience to hold his own against anybody. Spence is most definitely the favorite but I just cant see pac getting destroyed. He'll give Spence some shyt he's never seen before. And that's why it'll be a great experience for spence. He needs a fight like this to take his game to a new level.
Ya he didn’t pull off a Floyd performance but still good.Ok so I got high as fukk and rewatched the fight. This time I really focused on spence. I had em at an A+ on first watch, but after a rewatch I gotta move em to an A-. I overlooked some of the mistakes on first watch because it was such a domination. But you can still see that spence has some major flaws. He still loads up too much on some of his punches and throws super wide at times. A fast puncher would be able to come right up the middle and tag him when he does this. And he still has a tendency of leaning in and becoming off balanced when he throws. Especially when he goes to the body. He leaves himself WIDE open to an overhand right. Mikey just wasn't fast enough to exploit that. It would be a different story vs crawford. Even Thurman. Spence still has to tighten up that defense something serious. The wide punches and leaning in could be disastrous vs a bigger guy with elite speed.
After rewatch I think I still got tcraw as the favorite. His hand speed and counter punching will be the difference imo. Tcraw makes you pay for damn near every mistake you make in the ring. Still a 50-50 fight because we've never seen tcraw in there with a huge guy who won't stop. But I think Crawfords has the right combination of skills to exploit spences flaws.
And yea the main thing with the Pacquiao fight is spences length. That's why I think it'll be a battle of length vs speed. But I just think manny has the experience to hold his own against anybody. Spence is most definitely the favorite but I just cant see pac getting destroyed. He'll give Spence some shyt he's never seen before. And that's why it'll be a great experience for spence. He needs a fight like this to take his game to a new level.