2022 Midterm Elections: NO RED WAVE! - GOP Takes U.S. House; Dems Keep U.S. Senate

FAH1223

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Hall of Fame
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
72,101
Reputation
8,192
Daps
218,279
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC


For every year since 2008, Democrats have ceded ground at record rates among rural voters. The collapse of rural support for Dems reached a new and almost inconceivable nadir in this last election, despite the added “ingenuity” of Senate losers Joe Donnelly and Heidi Heitkamp’s One Country Project, a rural-outreach program that looked from the outset like nothing more than an attempt to secure Heitkamp a Cabinet seat.

Vilsack was part of the failed strategy as well, as a top rural adviser to the Biden campaign. Biden went on to win 42 percent of the rural vote; in the crucial swing state of Texas, where Democrats thought they might break through, Trump won a mind-blowing 74 percent of the rural vote, increasing not only his vote total but also his vote share over 2016. “Vilsack led Biden’s unimpressive rural campaign in 2020. As far as I can tell, our organization made more calls to convince rural voters to vote for Biden than the Biden campaign did for itself,” said People’s Action Director George Goehl in a statement.

The overwhelming response of Democrats to this runaway drop in rural support has been plain disinterest. We’ll make up the difference in cities or suburbs, they say again and again. Even if that six of one, half dozen of the other approach was working (and there’s plenty of evidence that it is not), it is brutally ignorant of the reality of the American political system.

Rural voters are inordinately powerful, as we (should) all know by now, a by-product of the anti-democratic makeup of the Senate, the nature of districting in the House, and to some degree, the structure of the Electoral College. One rural vote is not equivalent to one suburban vote. That has never been the exchange rate of American politics, and with every passing year, rural votes amass more and more influence. By the time Joe Biden is up for re-election, after another round of redistricting, rural votes will be more commanding still.

The inequality in that structure of American democracy happens to be the linchpin of Republican minority rule: They know well that the power of a rural voter is stronger than that of an urban or suburban one. They’ve been perfectly content to watch Democrats run up the score with empty vote share in California, knowing full well that their strength in rural areas means they can maintain conceivable majorities with just 45 percent total haul, so long as they maintain that crucial rural support. “If Democrats keep letting people fail upwards like this, they will never stop the bleeding. By 2040, the more rural half of this country could control 84 Senate seats. How does permanent majority leader status for the head of the Senate Republicans sound to you?” asked Goehl.

The last time Democrats were really competitive in these regions came during Barack Obama’s initial run in 2008, when his campaign rhetoric promised swift and decisive action on agribusiness monopolies like Cargill and Monsanto that had pushed and benefited from economic conditions that have plagued farmers for years. That messaging was strong enough to deliver agriculture-heavy states like Indiana, where Democrats haven’t even sniffed a competitive margin since.

To appoint an agriculture secretary who has long been loathed by rural voters is not just a needless error on policy; it’s a political catastrophe.

Of course, that rhetoric proved hollow. Obama appointed Vilsack to head up USDA, and he promptly went to work doing nothing to improve the lives of family farmers, while turning a blind eye even to punitive and retaliatory actions by those aforementioned companies. USDA and the Justice Department held five field hearings across rural America after Obama’s election, hearing tale after tale of punitive agribusinesses fleecing family farmers. After promising to help, the administration then didn’t do anything with what they learned, spuriously claiming that the antitrust laws prevented them from action.

Vilsack ginned up a heartwarming and entirely fictional tale about the plight of Black farmers during those years, which seemingly convinced only people within the Obama administration. Black farmers, meanwhile, were subject to such aggressive foreclosure processes from Vilsack’s department that the NAACP openly opposed his return to Biden’s Cabinet. Democratic vote share in rural areas collapsed almost immediately; rural voters, in many senses, still haven’t forgiven the party for that decision.

Democratic sympathizers will point out that rural areas represent a particular challenge for them regardless. In many of these regions, the media diet consists of just Sinclair Broadcasting and Fox News on television, and the arch-conservative iHeartMedia on radio. That observation is not exculpatory—if anything, it means that Democrats need to work harder to appeal to rural voters on policy and deliver them material gains that will win their loyalty at the ballot box.

That shouldn’t be an impossible task. The Trump years were also particularly hard on small farmers. Trump’s USDA hacked to bits the rules that shielded small farmers from retaliation by Big Ag. Sonny Perdue, his USDA chief, dissolved the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration program put in place to protect small farms, folding it into a PR program called the Agricultural Marketing Service. That set the table for an increasingly aggressive takeover by agribusiness, even by American standards: Farmers who used to earn 37 cents of every retail dollar are now pulling just 15.

That’s to say nothing of the adverse impacts of the trade war. Trump tried to paper over this by handing out billions of dollars in compensation to farmers, but most of the subsidies went to the top 10 percent of producers. That program could be significantly altered to support family farmers. There exist significant, material concerns that can be addressed with policy on day one of the Biden administration, even without congressional approval.

Returning Vilsack, whom rural voters already know and hate, to the role he held for both terms under Obama is by contrast incomprehensible. Many of the retreads Biden has re-installed have at least offered an acknowledgment that they made policy errors in their time in the Obama or Clinton administrations, or pledged to take things in a more progressive direction (yeah, we’ll see). Vilsack hasn’t even been required to perform an act of penance.
Click to expand...
 
Payday23

Payday23

Superstar
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
14,931
Reputation
1,546
Daps
55,847
FAH1223 said:
Click to expand...

Democrats just want to give ReThugs all 3 branches. These ReThugs are going to wreak havoc with the Judiciary, Congress, and POTUS when they win full control soon. The Dems will have no one to blame but themselves with these terrible decisions and retreads. They love to look good while losing
 
mr. smoke weed

mr. smoke weed

Smoke Album Done......Wait n See #SmokeSquad
Resting in Peace
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
27,316
Reputation
3,820
Daps
52,059
Reppin
Chi
FAH1223 said:
David Axelrod said he knew the Dems would get slaughtered in the 2010 midterms in February 2009 when they realized the stimulus was too small and didn’t fortify states/local govt enough.
Click to expand...
In 2019, people thought 2020 was going to be one of the best years ever, then COVID happened.

Can't predict the future. Especially since Trump won't be president in 2022.
 
Uncle Phil 36

Uncle Phil 36

All Star
Joined
Feb 24, 2014
Messages
4,926
Reputation
680
Daps
11,309
mr. smoke weed said:
In 2019, people thought 2020 was going to be one of the best years ever, then COVID happened.

Can't predict the future. Especially since Trump won't be president in 2022.
Click to expand...


Agree with this. Will check back on this thread in June 2022 lol
 
ZoeGod

ZoeGod

I’m from Brooklyn a place where stars are born.
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
9,170
Reputation
4,610
Daps
52,669
Reppin
Brooklyn,NY
FAH1223 said:
Click to expand...

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again Dems do not take idea of Republican minority rule seriously. They think winning presidential elections is enough and they keep talking about demographics will save the day. I don’t know man. The GOP has the courts set for them, they got the rural vote in their pocket which means they can control state legislatures which means voter suppression laws will go all out and the SC got their back. That will stymie demographics in key sunbelt states. And to win the White House they just needs to win key states and not worry about the popular vote. Republicans controlling 84 senate seats by 2040 is a frightening thought. But it’s more likely Republicans getting the trifecta than Democrats.
If Biden doesn’t get a senate majority from GA his presidency will be inconsequential like Gerald Ford. The GA runoffs will determine everything. :francis:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top