Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
i just remembered "shes just like your abuela"
This post doesn't make sense to me. A more tuned in black vote should mean a better black vote. Biden should be thanking right now of that's the case.Primary voters are more affluent than typical voters and are more tuned in. Thus you get partisans voting.
makes perfect sense, let's be honest, black polling right now is literally based on name recognition and the obama connection. it doesnt mean the black vote is truly tuned in. but if you go poll some random city down south, it's exactly why Biden is the name/gets the support.This post doesn't make sense to me. A more tuned in black vote should mean a better black vote. Biden should be thanking right now of that's the case.
LMAO
Flashing the top 3 candidates like the Akatsuki has me
I would like to caution you guys against making arguments about polling this earlyLastly, the whole notion that somehow Elizabeth Warren is in anyway comparable to Barack Obama as a person (not as a policy maker) is absurd. Obama already have a third of the south when he won Iowa. They already loved him but didn’t see it happening. Warren is polling in single digits. Comparing the two things are pointless. Obama had legitimate southern surrogates, Warren has no one of note endorsing her over Biden. She is also trailing Sanders and Biden among Latinos.
Ok, I guess I agree with that but the tuned in vote should've been a lot more anti Clinton in the last electionmakes perfect sense, let's be honest, black polling right now is literally based on name recognition and the obama connection. it doesnt mean the black vote is truly tuned in. but if you go poll some random city down south, it's exactly why Biden is the name/gets the support.
if there were a way to do a poll of "tuned in" black people, you'd probably see a much wider disparity in support
not really, clinton had her faults, but people tend to use that as an attack on her qualifications. clinton had both the name and qualifications to be pres and appeal to the moderate/conservative base. her missteps weren't in the primary, it was the general.Ok, I guess I agree with that but the tuned in vote should've been a lot more anti Clinton in the last election
While everything you say is correct...I still think she was a bad candidate and whoever the Democratic Nominee ended up being would've had the name recognition. Her missteps in terms of the black community was disqualifier before and should've been again. Our people should be using MORE than name recognition and not relying at all on whether a candidate appeals to moderates. We have a big enough base to push that forward.not really, clinton had her faults, but people tend to use that as an attack on her qualifications. clinton had both the name and qualifications to be pres and appeal to the moderate/conservative base. her missteps weren't in the primary, it was the general.
I know you aint talking about me, the dude who was yelling at people after Bernie lost not to be dumb while my fellow moderator was sayingn let Trump win so that the revolution would be upon us.Good God I almost choked on my food on this one
him and his robber baron friends are nervous, hell i would be too
QUOTE="JMurder, post: 34963845, member: 1156"]While everything you say is correct...I still think she was a bad candidate and whoever the Democratic Nominee ended up being would've had the name recognition. Her missteps in terms of the black community was disqualifier before and should've been again. Our people should be using MORE than name recognition and not relying at all on whether a candidate appeals to moderates. We have a big enough base to push that forward.[/QUOTE]not really, clinton had her faults, but people tend to use that as an attack on her qualifications. clinton had both the name and qualifications to be pres and appeal to the moderate/conservative base. her missteps weren't in the primary, it was the general.