The optics of that
HOLY fukkN shytWhat rubs people the wrong way about Bernie is too many of his supporters saying they won't vote (or will vote Trump) if he doesn't win the primary. Which isn't really something you see supporters of other candidates say, at least not often. And no, it's not a myth -
Bernie or bust: The Sanders supporters who will back Trump if their man isn't the Democratic nominee
HOLY fukkN shyt
MORE BERNIE PRIMARY VOTERS VOTED FOR HILLARY IN 2016 THAN HILLARY PRIMARY VOTERS VOTED FOR OBAMA IN 2008
WE'VE SAID THIS REPEATED-fukkN-LY
Even this article says the 20-30pt %'s are exaggerated but Bernie primary supporters had a better turnout.
this gets fukkn annoying....IT'S 2019 AND YOU nikkaS ARE STILL REPEATING shyt THAT WAS DEBUNKED TWO WHOLE fukkN YEARS AGO.
But somehow you guys are better than Trump reporters
This is why I avoid these fukkn threads. 2019. Still repeating 2017 myths. You're not ready for 2020 b. Please don't vote.
What rubs people the wrong way about Bernie is too many of his supporters saying they won't vote (or will vote Trump) if he doesn't win the primary. Which isn't really something you see supporters of other candidates say, at least not often. And no, it's not a myth -
Bernie or bust: The Sanders supporters who will back Trump if their man isn't the Democratic nominee
Party seems to have had something to do with it — Sanders-Trump voters were much less likely than Sanders-Clinton or Sanders-third party voters to have been Democrats.
A more important caveat, perhaps, is that other statistics suggest that this level of "defection" isn't all that out of the ordinary. Believing that all those Sanders voters somehow should have been expected to not vote for Trump may be to misunderstand how primary voters behave.
For example, Schaffner tells NPR that around 12 percent of Republican primary voters (including 34 percent of Ohio Gov. John Kasich voters and 11 percent of Florida Sen. Marco Rubio voters) ended up voting for Clinton. And according to one 2008 study, around 25 percent of Clinton primary voters in that election ended up voting for Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in the general. (In addition, the data showed 13 percent of McCain primary voters ended up voting for Obama, and 9 percent of Obama voters ended up voting for McCain — perhaps signaling something that swayed voters between primaries and the general election, or some amount of error in the data, or both.)
“These numbers only affirm what the senator has said many times: people don’t like insurance companies, they like their doctors and their hospitals,” Sanders’ campaign said of the data in an email to Morning Consult. “Despite what the pharmaceutical and insurance industries will tell you, Medicare for All is the only proposal that gives Americans the freedom to control their own futures — change jobs, start a family, start a business — and keep their doctor.
Several polls have demonstrated that support for Medicare for All plummets when Americans learn the system would replace employer-sponsored coverage with one sweeping plan, forcing single-payer supporters to go on the defensive to alleviate concerns from voters. But as candidates attempt to persuade voters that Medicare for All would not require diminishing the role of private insurers — further adding to confusion among the electorate about what exactly the system would entail — the new data suggests that the consequences of that argument can be mitigated by clarifying that losing private insurers would not affect access to preferred providers.
What's the difference policy wise? We would definitely be in more overseas conflicts if McCaii was president.Compare voting for McCain to voting for Trump
What's the difference policy wise? We would definitely be in more overseas conflicts if McCaii was president.
Thanks.He’s dead.
Thanks.