I don't think it's fair to say Liz is rolling out standard Democrat proposals. She has the most transformative agenda in the entire Democratic field, and what's truly incredible about it is how she's taking broad, moral concepts and turning them into tangible, actionable plans. I've never seen anyone do that as well as she's doing it right now. Whether or not the average person is reading every sentence of her proposals is secondary to the fact that she's making them widely available and channeling public sentiment/energy towards real, undiluted goals. She's not just hiding behind the soaring rhetoric, she's showing her work. She's bridging the divide between rhetoric and praxis. To say that she's just putting a wonkish spin on standard concepts and her campaign approach is mainly marketing-driven is wildly downplaying the importance of transparency and, like, actual policy. I can understand the impetus behind spurning intelligent and well thought out plans in the wake of neoliberalism's bloodless wonkery, but to then flip 180 degrees and castigate someone for being prepared and aggressive in the breadth and depth of their policy proposals is dumb.
What's needed is someone who has both the desire/heart to remake the state in a progressive mold, and the skills/abilities to actually do so. Liz is the only one in the race who has demonstrated both.