NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,331
Reputation
5,924
Daps
94,011
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
You think tulsi is a good look on the dem presidential ticket? :dahell:

she’s not only polling low af, she’s turned a good 80% of Dems against her. What dem voter is jumping to vote tulsi into any part of the White House? Hell, her current showing is due in part to republicans :dead:

She did have a lot of potential but shes an idiot

While commendable, she fukked herself over in 2015/2016

Then this cycle she decided to be a weekly guest on tucker carlson as if that would endear herself to democrats

Going on there once? Ok. Going on there after getting the nomination? Ok. Going on like 10 times before the first vote? :what:
 

Json

Superstar
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
13,345
Reputation
1,526
Daps
40,803
Reppin
Central VA
Maybe I’m a pessimist, but these ”democratic elite”, centrists, etc can weather living in a trump world for 4 more years better than bernie’s coalition, seems dangerous to bet on winning without them. They won’t be the ones to suffer as much if they decide not to fall in line

This is my fear with Biden. It’s not that he has the black vote, it’s that people think black people will turn out in Obama numbers which is ludicrous. Plus that he’s going to win back white people(even after they continue to show their behinds in voting).

Black people can say f both parties and weather another Trump storm cause he hasn’t really come at us. He’s changing that judiciary doesn’t resonate to most voters.

Taking it state by state, Trump can win those same Republican states with low engagement from black voters.
 

nyknick

refuel w/ chocolate milk
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
18,714
Reputation
6,070
Daps
90,751
I cant help but notice you didn't prpopse a better ticket :dead: what a soft post
The point of my post was that literally anyone would be a better VP pick than Tulsi.

Were you just banned from the coli or the whole internet? Tulsi tried running using the 2016 playbook and is now a non entity not just in democratic party but overall.

First it was excessive Fox News appearances, then getting punked by Hillary and her response to it and then finally she played herself with that impeachment vote.
 

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,594
The fukk is formally self educated? nikkas making up phrases to sound like they’re saying something

Formally/self educated, means formally or self educated. I figured since you were college educated u could decipher what that meant, with the slash sign. :francis:.

guess you’re not as educated as you think.

And I don’t recognize formal education as the only way you can be educated. I’m a firm believer in self-education.

I hire ppl bc of their intelligence, not bc of the degree they may or may not hold.
 

Worthless Loser

Blackpilled
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
17,736
Reputation
5,598
Daps
118,697
I don't see a path for Warren to get to 270 against Trump. I don't see her winning enough swing states. You cannot use what happened in 2018 as a prediction for a 2020 election map. President, Governor and Congressional races are completely different.

Partly because she's a woman, partly because she's a progressive, partly because of her voter base which isn't as diverse and big as Biden or Sanders.
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,156
Reputation
4,543
Daps
44,167
it’s patronizing not to say 6% wealth tax. Which is what she’s selling.
:dead:

She's selling a 2% wealth tax on $50M+ and a 6% wealth tax on $1B+. So who exactly is she being patronizing towards? Those poor, poor billionaires? :mjlol:

You and Leon Cooperman can go cry me a river :childplease:
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,156
Reputation
4,543
Daps
44,167
I don't see a path for Warren to get to 270 against Trump. I don't see her winning enough swing states. You cannot use what happened in 2018 as a prediction for a 2020 election map. President, Governor and Congressional races are completely different.
Hillary only lost the electoral college by the razor-thin margin of 77,000 votes in PA, WI, and MI and she didn't even bother campaigning in those states. Unless you think Trump has gained even broader support and popularity since the election or that Warren would stupidly repeat Hillary's fatal mistakes, she would easily overcome those numbers. :coffee:
 

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,594
:dead:

She's selling a 2% wealth tax on $50M+ and a 6% wealth tax on $1B+. So who exactly is she being patronizing towards? Those poor, poor billionaires? :mjlol:

You and Leon Cooperman can go cry me a river :childplease:


I mean she’s acting like people can’t count. Just say 6%. That’s her problem, her messaging comes off as conniving.

she’s never said 6% once, not once. That’s a problem if you can’t be honest about the biggest initiative you’re proposing.
 

Worthless Loser

Blackpilled
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
17,736
Reputation
5,598
Daps
118,697
Hillary only lost the electoral college by the razor-thin margin of 77,000 votes in PA, WI, and MI and she didn't even bother campaigning in those states. Unless you think Trump has gained even broader support and popularity since the election or that Warren would stupidly repeat Hillary's fatal mistakes, she would easily overcome those numbers. :coffee:
I think more people are willing to vote Trump in 2020 than 2016. He'll have more Republicans who didn't like him at first, possibly more black men sadly, and his "silent majority" will come out in record numbers.

As I said, being a woman, being a progressive, and not having a base as diverse as Biden or Sanders is an issue.

-Edit, I'm worried about independents as well taking Trump over her as well.
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,331
Reputation
5,924
Daps
94,011
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
Hillary only lost the electoral college by the razor-thin margin of 77,000 votes in PA, WI, and MI and she didn't even bother campaigning in those states. Unless you think Trump has gained even broader support and popularity since the election or that Warren would stupidly repeat Hillary's fatal mistakes, she would easily overcome those numbers. :coffee:

She would trot bernie out there for her :francis:
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,331
Reputation
5,924
Daps
94,011
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
I think more people are willing to vote Trump in 2020 than 2016. He'll have more Republicans who didn't like him at first, possibly more black men sadly, and his "silent majority" will come out in record numbers.

As I said, being a woman, being a progressive, and not having a base as diverse as Biden or Sanders is an issue.

-Edit, I'm worried about independents as well taking Trump over her as well.

Independents is where bernie is far stronger than warren

Bernie could win independents. Trump would beat warren with them
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
105,021
Reputation
13,999
Daps
304,939
Reppin
NULL
You think tulsi is a good look on the dem presidential ticket? :dahell:

she’s not only polling low af, she’s turned a good 80% of Dems against her. What dem voter is jumping to vote tulsi into any part of the White House? Hell, her current showing is due in part to republicans :dead:
nah, your right :dead:

i did at first, but shes a fukkin weirdo with all her foreign policy bullshyt. but if she wasnt :noah:
 
Top