philmonroe
Superstar
I never claimed to know his reasons. If we asked people randomly esp if this situation never happened I’d bet big money most will say nah son. If my personally thinking it wasn’t a good idea isn’t relevant you do know the same applies to you ad your thoughts on that same part too? I never said or implied he stole anything or was trying to.They are very realistic, you dont know his reasons for wanting to look at that house. He could have been curious about what houses look like before the walls are up. You personally thinking it wasn't a good idea is not relevant. He didnt steal shyt, he didn't look like he was scoping the house out for later, this video only proves that he looked at a house.
You making the argument about how he shouldn't have been in the house excuses his murder even if you cant understand why. If he was breaking the law then state law gave them the right to run him down and kill him for fighting back and not obeying their commands. If you were on the jury, they'd get off because you're convinced that he had no right to be at that house in the first place.
Him looking at that house shouldn't even matter, and this video proves it. You know know anyone that would do that? Well I know plenty of people who would do that so his behavior isnt strange or unrealistic to me.
It doesn’t excuse his murder hence why I said over and over and over these are two separate things. Your point would only be true if I said I believed that if a person is stealing/suspected of stealing should be killed. Again I’ve never said or implied such. Ive also said it don’t give them the right to chase or kill dude no matter what the stupid law says. Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should and this is a great example of that. They should look at changing the laws because I definitely don’t think random people should take the law into their own hands.
As far as the jury your emotions lead you to assumptions that aren’t close to true smh. You and others really need to understand I don’t have to agree 1000% or else I’m on the complete opposite side of you. That’s chick logic not what us men supposed to be into. I’d still say they were guilty because they did too much relative to what even the worse case scenario was. Even if he wasn’t killed and they just pulled guns on dude I would be for them going away. I don’t see how that equates to I’d let them off the hook outside of feelings.