at you posting this novel at 9 on a Saturday night, then editing it at 4am in the morning. You try waaay too hard dude.They don't ISO green to go by anyone because he's not that type of player. Even when they go real small and have him at center, they don't ISO him to go one on one. Is TT any quicker than Oakley? How many times did GS ISO Green to go by TT to force the defense to rotate? Dude has a quickness advantage damn near every night and they still consistently allow him to go one on one against his defender. He averaged almost 10 shots a game and half them shots was 3s. He gets his offense off of others. He's not someone who they go to to create.
Except the Grizz won 2 out of the first 3 games without hitting a lot of 3s then they're lock down perimeter defender who was giving the Warriors fits got re-injured and that changed the series. You can keep repeating the same shyt posting your little smileys all you want, it's not going to change that.They didn't hit enough 3'sThe analytics said that all year, eventually they were going to run into a better 3 point shooting team, their defense wouldn't be enough to compensate for the lack of shooting and you cannot keep trading 2 pts vs 3pts.
I haven't mentioned how well I think that Knocks team would or wouldn't do against this current Warriors team. I'm just refuting the dumb shyt that you're saying. Again, nobody on this Warriors team can consistently create off of the dribble besides Steph.There's literally nobody on that Knick roster that can create off the dribble, yet you think they'd hang
My take on the premise of your thread is that today's league and game are different in comparison to the 90s. I've said that over and over.
What do you mean "which is it"? The game used to be played inside out until the league changed some rules and how the game was called to bolster scoring, on the perimeter especially. The zone was implemented to limit interior scoring and handchecking was outlawed(along with bumping cutters, committing hard fouls on drives to the basket, ect) to make it easier for guys on the perimeter. Where are you getting lost?You don't even understand what you're talking about. You have repeatedly said the rules were changed to bolster perimeter scoring, yet here you are saying the NBA used to be inside-out. So which is it, which rule are you trying to talk about? Because the Zone was implemented to limit interior scoring, handchecking was eliminated because of the fact teams were using the zone & handchecking at the same time, those two things only existed together for 3 years from 2001-2002 to 2004-2005. The handcheck rule had nothing to do with interior scoring, the zone did and the zone was effective vs perimeter players as well, so pick which one you're talking about.
Get off of that feminine bytchy shyt. I haven't said one thing about hand checking until the post in response to you bringing it up. You don't even have a point here. So Mike Conley would be just as good in the 90s because Michael Adams averaged 27-11 one year? How about you put those numbers in context stat boy? He averaged those numbers on 39% shooting on the worst team in basketball that year. They were the definition of empty ass stats. This is the clown you ppl respect so much for his supposed sports knowledge?
at these wack ass arguments that you spent hours composing.You're stupid for thinking that Bogut would be able to guard any decent 90s center one on one. Who's even behind Bogut? This team goes up against a prime go to 90s center trying to play them one on one with Bogut and he's in foul trouble then who are they bringing in, Ezelli? That playing Green/Barnes at pf also wouldn't cut it in the 90's because they'd be food in the paint. This GS wouldn't be able to play the same way that they're playing now in the 90s and you're an idiot if you don't see that.
and Jeff Green hasn't sucked/underachieved everywhere he's been...... fakkit?
The small ball jump shooting perimeter oriented styles that a lot of these current teams play with now would hinder them in a league that isn't geared toward promoting that style. These teams would definitely have a harder time playing in a league that allowed more physicality and wasn't called as tightly on the perimeter. I'm amazed at how stupid you are. You were up to 4am editing this dumb shyt
My name isn't "a lot of people on this forum" fakkit. The things that others are saying don't have a gotdamn thing to do with me. I've said from the start that the premise of your thread is invalid because the game/league is different now in comparison to the 90s. This GS would have to be constructed differently to compete for rings in the 90s.
You talk like your simple ass "90s teams just don't hit enough 3s" means anything. You're just some internet stat geek. You can't even follow along and keep up. When I said that Bron isn't Mike and Blatt isn't Phil it was in response to your "this GS team matches up well with Mike's Bulls, we saw Bron drop 40 and lose" comment. The point was that this Cavs team isn't Mike's Bulls and they still almost lost that game.
I don't have an agenda here. I'm not willing to make a blanket statement either way. Again, I think that the premise of your comparison is invalid. If this current GS team was in the mid 90s NBA? Nah, I don't think that they're championship contenders.
Green would be exposed and taken advantage of in the paint offensively and defensively as an undersized pf going up against guys like Oakley in the 90s. He's simply not big and strong enough hence the "undersized" label.
Teams in the 90s weren't shooting as many 3s back then you stupid motherfukker. They played a different style of game. If it's just about spreading the floor jacking up 3s then why weren't the run&gun offensive-minded teams who shot the most 3s winning back in the 80s-90s? Why didn't the Suns beat the Bulls in '93 since they attempted and made so many more 3s? In that series the Suns made twice as many 3s as the Bulls did, yet they still lost in 6. You've got to go deeper bruh. The 3 point shot is not the end all be all. Yea GS hit a lot of 3s but it's their defense that makes them a really good team.
Btw, switch up your smiley game. using the same one over and over just looks corny.
