1310, Mali Empire sailed to the Americas before Columbus

blaccbeard

blaccbeard

Superstar
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
3,518
Reputation
1,550
Daps
19,616
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited said:
Ban Bet my ethnicity or STFU....but first, take IVS' dikk out your mouth.​

:umad:​
Click to expand...

giphy.gif


I got no dog in yall's little personal quarrel, but i'll ban bet anybody claiming that Africans never seafared and colonized the globe when there is evidence everywhere.


You gonna have to prove you're black to me saying some shyt like that. And no im not going to argue with you about your stance, and no i won't accept a pic of a random tanned hand as proof.


Dafunkdoc_Unlimited said:
No, it doesn't since they look just like the present-day inhabitants who are NOT Black.

:sas2:​
Click to expand...

Now you're claiming the Olmec heads aren't black faces? :gucci:

Yea you def need to prove you're black. Let's do this.
 
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,630
Reputation
8,094
Daps
121,489
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
From the PEER-REVIEWED article I linked earlier.....​

In 1976, Ivan Van Sertima proposed that New World civilizations were strongly influenced by diffusion from Africa. The first and most important contact, he argued, was between Nubians and Olmecs in 700 B.C., and it was followed by other contacts from Mali in A.D. 1300. This theory has spread widely in the African‐American community, both lay and scholarly, but it has never been evaluated at length by Mesoamericanists. This article shows the proposal to be devoid of any foundation. First, no genuine African artifact has ever been found in a controlled archaeological excavation in the New World. The presence of Africanorigin plants such as the bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) or of African genes in New World cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) shows that there was contact between the Old World and the New, but this contact occurred too long ago to have involved any human agency and is irrelevant to Egyptian‐Olmec contact. The colossal Olmec heads, which resemble a stereotypical “Negroid,” were carved hundreds of years before the arrival of the presumed models. Additionally, Nubians, who come from a desert environment and have long, high noses, do not resemble their supposed “portraits.” Claims for the diffusion of pyramid building and mummification are also fallacious.
Click to expand...

:sas2:​
 
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,630
Reputation
8,094
Daps
121,489
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
blaccbeard said:
I got no dog in yall's little personal quarrel, but i'll ban bet anybody claiming that Africans never seafared and colonized the globe when there is evidence everywhere.
Click to expand...

They never came to the Americas until the 15th Century.​

blaccbeard said:
Now you're claiming the Olmec heads aren't black faces?

Yea you def need to prove you're black. Let's do this.
Click to expand...

That's a fact, holmes. They aren't Black faces and were carved a couple hundred years before the Mali 'expedition'. They are Native South American faces that are still there with absolutely NO trace of African DNA.

Now as far as the Ban Bet, you post in the thread designated for it, contact a mod to make it legit, and we'll get this poppin'.

:sas1:​
 
Everythingg

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,142
Reputation
-2,408
Daps
16,880
Mhofu said:
They don't look like dreadlocks to me.
Click to expand...

:russ: Its funny to see clowns deny reality. Dark skin people with loc'd hair and you say they dont look like locs..

But scratch all that, nobody shows these indigenous Americans existing and thats the problem. Show they existed, then lets determine who's who instead of acting like it was all mongloid like people till the "slave trade" happened in the "1600s".
:unimpressed:

Let's just discard archaeology, history, genetics, linguistics and many other fields of study for discerning the truth about history, for a picture with a few amerindians with supposed dreadlocks as proof for Black people in the Americas pre 16th century CE.:lolbron::stopitslime::mjlol:

.
Click to expand...

No. Lets discard the cacs interpretation of archaeology, history, genetics, linguistics, and many oher fields of study for discerning the truth about history and build our own database. No cac or history teacher EVER showed me that mural.

Oh yea I didnt mention that those arent "pictures" but are murals that are from an ancient time period? Can you tell me when we, in America, are told about this ancient civilization that had people of dark skin color with locs as hair?
:jbhmm::umad:
 
blaccbeard

blaccbeard

Superstar
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
3,518
Reputation
1,550
Daps
19,616
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited said:
They never came to the Americas until the 15th Century.​



That's a fact, holmes. They aren't Black faces and were carved a couple hundred years before the Mali 'expedition'. They are Native South American faces that are still there with absolutely NO trace of African DNA.

Now as far as the Ban Bet, you post in the thread designated for it, contact a mod to make it legit, and we'll get this poppin'.

:sas1:​
Click to expand...

Aight i'll link you the thread in a min, so if you can prove you're black and when i come off my ban, i'll gladly come back and debate this with you as this history shyt is my LIFE, i study and eat this shyt up all day everyday. I'll happily break it down with a fellow breh and try to sway you to see the truth with my evidence, but i wont debate black history with someone who could easily be a racist cac pretending to be black, won't do it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top