$125k fully remote or $165k three days on site, which would you choose?

HoldThisL

Captain L
Joined
Dec 7, 2014
Messages
13,935
Reputation
1,957
Daps
44,085
If I was in dire need of $165K I would take it but $125K is enough for me so I will take the remote job. Nothing can replace flexibility and time. :manny:
 

Conan

Superstar
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
5,116
Reputation
1,248
Daps
16,282
Reppin
Brooklyn
If you can take the $125k and move somewhere cheaper then what's the point of having this $125k vs $165k debate???:russ:

Because that's one of the advantages of taking the $125k. Not being tied to a specific location. You could relocate to South America or Bali or Kenya, cut your living expenses drastically, while still working.

If I was forced to stay in the same location as the job and work from home in that vicinity, then yeah I'd take $165k but that's a stupid way to look at it.
 

Ezekiel 25:17

Veteran
Joined
Jul 17, 2018
Messages
33,774
Reputation
2,124
Daps
122,071
Because that's one of the advantages of taking the $125k. Not being tied to a specific location. You could relocate to South America or Bali or Kenya, cut your living expenses drastically, while still working.

If I was forced to stay in the same location as the job and work from home in that vicinity, then yeah I'd take $165k but that's a stupid way to look at it.

So now the argument is one sided.

I think both incomes should be the same city with a relatively cheap cost of living, otherwise there would be no real point in taking the $165k
 

desjardins

Veteran
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
17,015
Reputation
1,118
Daps
63,210
Reppin
Mustard Island
Assuming the onsite job is in the city I already live in I'm taking that, always go for the higher salary unless it's a MAJOR advantage not to somehow (ie: you live in ohio and the new job is in SF)
That $40k difference could cover the majority of your bills, even after taxes.
I say this as a person typing in my home office right now and having worked from home the last 5 yrs
 

Conan

Superstar
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
5,116
Reputation
1,248
Daps
16,282
Reppin
Brooklyn
So now the argument is one sided.

I think both incomes should be the same city with a relatively cheap cost of living, otherwise there would be no real point in taking the $165k

I see what you're saying. For this analysis we should not take into account potential reductions in cost of living as the result of moving somewhere much cheaper. Fair

Still, it comes down to whether you like flexibility of lifestyle/location OR extra cash and being in the office.
 

UpNext

Superstar
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Messages
4,635
Reputation
1,602
Daps
17,274
Because that's one of the advantages of taking the $125k. Not being tied to a specific location. You could relocate to South America or Bali or Kenya, cut your living expenses drastically, while still working.

If I was forced to stay in the same location as the job and work from home in that vicinity, then yeah I'd take $165k but that's a stupid way to look at it.
Your remote job will allow you to move to a radically different timezone? Or would you have to adjust your sleep schedule and work at night/sleep during the day?

Why would I take a pay cut to go into the office? :mjlol:

Been remote since 2020, and I ain't going back :ahh:

Y'all be safe though
 

num123

Speak like a child
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
6,733
Reputation
1,768
Daps
27,303
Reppin
Bay Area/Chicago
I'm just saying, y'all make it seem like it's bumper to bumper for a majority of Americans. Again, the median commute is 26 minutes. That's actually not bad at all

For somebody that wants the $165k, a 26 minute commute ain't shyt.
But the point is still that depending where you live and work that time can be much longer than the average by a lot, and with no exaggeration.

Also, another thing i do not think you are taking into account is empty time. At least for me and some others, i do not need to be constantly behind my computer to work or need to be on it for 8 hours to get my work done. Majority of the time i would work 4 hours at the most and not all at the same time, but still have to go into work for the whole 8.

Now since i am WFH and my work is still project based, i can work whenever i want. That means that i regularly work on the weekends and late at night while watching something else, so i have more free time/flexibility during the week. You can't get that working from the office.
 

Conan

Superstar
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
5,116
Reputation
1,248
Daps
16,282
Reppin
Brooklyn
Your remote job will allow you to move to a radically different timezone? Or would you have to adjust your sleep schedule and work at night/sleep during the day?

Nah, most jobs require you to work to a specific timezone. If the job is in New York and you're in London, then you're on your laptop 2 pm to 10 pm. That restricts you from certain locations (SE Asia for example) unless you're ok with working at night at that specific location.
 

85 East

DJ D'eeznuts
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
5,272
Reputation
2,043
Daps
17,848
:mjlol:

You think a hybrid role where you work 3 days in the office means you are off for the other 4?

This nikka would get fired the first week
Either way, work is only 8 hours. With a Monday and Friday remote you still have way more time to hustle
 
Top