12/7 DAZN: "Jihad in Riyadh" Andy Ruiz vs Anthony Joshua 2 (WBA/WBO/IBF Heavyweight Titles)

Who Wins the Rematch?


  • Total voters
    131
  • Poll closed .

The Ruler 09

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
38,018
Reputation
1,707
Daps
38,055
Reppin
NULL
Eh... I'd rather him face Rivas again

It’s very unlikely to be against a top fighter. This is just a run out to keep fit, in the U.K he’s a PPV fighter. He’s only coming back here cause UKAD haven’t released their statement yet but he wants to keep active. WBC on their bullshyt making up their own rules, he was supposed to fight Wilder but they’ve taken the mandatory away and given it to Fury (even though he was fighting Wilder anyway which makes no sense) and they’ve said Whyte’s shot will now come before February 2021. This is if the UKAD situation is resolved, which is ridiculous, if it’s resolved he should get it February 2020 as agreed not 2021. Currently he was cleared to fight by both organisations and has no bans or anything. There was supposed to be a statement from UKAD clearing it up but they often delay cause any mistakes can be costly for them so they take their time. This is just a keep busy fight while he’s trying to get everything resolved. Unlikely to be again say an elite fight, that’s why it’s on the undercard rather than it’s own show.
 

Black_Jesus

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
16,283
Reputation
723
Daps
21,270
Reppin
from the home of coca-cola, i'm not referring to s
It’s very unlikely to be against a top fighter. This is just a run out to keep fit, in the U.K he’s a PPV fighter. He’s only coming back here cause UKAD haven’t released their statement yet but he wants to keep active. WBC on their bullshyt making up their own rules, he was supposed to fight Wilder but they’ve taken the mandatory away and given it to Fury (even though he was fighting Wilder anyway which makes no sense) and they’ve said Whyte’s shot will now come before February 2021. This is if the UKAD situation is resolved, which is ridiculous, if it’s resolved he should get it February 2020 as agreed not 2021. Currently he was cleared to fight by both organisations and has no bans or anything. There was supposed to be a statement from UKAD clearing it up but they often delay cause any mistakes can be costly for them so they take their time. This is just a keep busy fight while he’s trying to get everything resolved. Unlikely to be again say an elite fight, that’s why it’s on the undercard rather than it’s own show.
:mjlol:
Are you really in here defending Whyte as if he didn’t pop dirty while WBC, VADA, or anybody from Rivas team wasn’t informed and the fight was allowed to still go on by the crooked BBBoC?
 

The Ruler 09

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
38,018
Reputation
1,707
Daps
38,055
Reppin
NULL
:mjlol:
Are you really in here defending Whyte as if he didn’t pop dirty while WBC, VADA, or anybody from Rivas team wasn’t informed and the fight was allowed to still go on by the crooked BBBoC?

He didn't, there was an adverse finding on a sample with UKAD they investigated and after they did he was cleared to fight. He was cleared by VADA completely and passed all their tests, there's nothing to be informed about, those are the rules, UKAD have confidentiality and aren't allowed to inform anybody, anyway there was nothing to inform cause he was cleared, obviously in their mind for a reason because there was no wrondoing. They are supposed to be putting a statement out but they have to make sure it's accurate or risk huge liability with Whyte or with others.
 

Black_Jesus

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
16,283
Reputation
723
Daps
21,270
Reppin
from the home of coca-cola, i'm not referring to s
He didn't, there was an adverse finding on a sample with UKAD they investigated and after they did he was cleared to fight. He was cleared by VADA completely and passed all their tests, there's nothing to be informed about, those are the rules, UKAD have confidentiality and aren't allowed to inform anybody, anyway there was nothing to inform cause he was cleared, obviously in their mind for a reason because there was no wrondoing. They are supposed to be putting a statement out but they have to make sure it's accurate or risk huge liability with Whyte or with others.
:mjlol: you can’t be this dumb.. So why has the WBO, WBA, IBF all dropped him from the rankings then if all the rules were followed.. huh smart guy?
 

The Ruler 09

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
38,018
Reputation
1,707
Daps
38,055
Reppin
NULL
:mjlol: you can’t be this dumb.. So why has the WBO, WBA, IBF all dropped him from the rankings then if all the rules were followed.. huh smart guy?

You really don't know what you're talking about do you, Interim champions don't get put in the rankings fool. Neither do champions, same reason why Wilder isn't ranked with WBO for example, learn what you're talking about before speaking, would save a lot of time.
 

The Ruler 09

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
38,018
Reputation
1,707
Daps
38,055
Reppin
NULL
Why didn’t UKAD just reveal the B sample if it was just “adverse findings”.. Did Eddie Hearn forget to pay somebody?? Is that why the info got leaked @The Ruler 09 ? :mjpls:

Because there is no "B Sample", people who say that completely misunderstanding the issue. There's no need for a B Sample because he was cleared after a specific test with UKAD was investigated, after that was done he was ruled to be fully cleared hence why he was allowed to fight. VADA which is the testing Wilder and all them do SOLEY Whyte passed FULLY, there was just a finding in UKAD which they checked over, after they did they ruled there wasn't an issue. UKAD will most likely put a statement out in due course about why they cleared him, after that the issue can be done with. As I said he was cleared by both UKAD and VADA to fight.
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
123,486
Reputation
8,538
Daps
146,029
Reppin
Westcoast
Joshua is finished if he loses...time to see what his heart is made of. The Klitscho comeback is in the window now...gotta shut everyone up now.
 
Last edited:

Black_Jesus

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
16,283
Reputation
723
Daps
21,270
Reppin
from the home of coca-cola, i'm not referring to s
Because there is no "B Sample", people who say that completely misunderstanding the issue. There's no need for a B Sample because he was cleared after a specific test with UKAD was investigated, after that was done he was ruled to be fully cleared hence why he was allowed to fight. VADA which is the testing Wilder and all them do SOLEY Whyte passed FULLY, there was just a finding in UKAD which they checked over, after they did they ruled there wasn't an issue. UKAD will most likely put a statement out in due course about why they cleared him, after that the issue can be done with. As I said he was cleared by both UKAD and VADA to fight.
:ufdup:we understand the issue.. Whyte misjudged his Dianabol cycle, that's all..Hearn didn't pay all the right people to keep it hidden. :mjlol: at there being no need for a B sample. Keep telling yourself that dumb shyt

And the fact that it's been over 4 months and UKAD and the BBBoC hasn't put out a statement to clear it all up is very telling...
 

The Ruler 09

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
38,018
Reputation
1,707
Daps
38,055
Reppin
NULL
:ufdup:we understand the issue.. Whyte misjudged his Dianabol cycle, that's all..Hearn didn't pay all the right people to keep it hidden. :mjlol: at there being no need for a B sample. Keep telling yourself that dumb shyt

And the fact that it's been over 4 months and UKAD and the BBBoC hasn't put out a statement to clear it all up is very telling...

This is all agenda based bias speculation based off zero facts. Facts are he was cleared by both organisations.
 

Black_Jesus

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
16,283
Reputation
723
Daps
21,270
Reppin
from the home of coca-cola, i'm not referring to s
This is all agenda based bias speculation based off zero facts. Facts are he was cleared by both organisations.
based off zero facts?? lol okay

Dillian Whyte Tested Positive For Two Dianabol Metabolites
By Thomas Hauser
Published On Thu Jul 25, 2019, 01:45 PM EDT


By Thomas Hauser

Yesterday, July 24, BoxingScene.com reported that an "A" sample taken from Dillian Whyte by United Kingdom Anti-Doping (UKAD) tested positive for one or more banned substances prior to Whyte's July 20 fight in London against Oscar Rivas. BoxingScene has now confirmed that the substances were epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone, two metabolites of the banned drug Dianabol.

A metabolite is a byproduct of the body breaking down or metabolizing a drug into a different substance. When a drug is leaving the user's system, it leaves these intermediate end products.

Dianabol is an anabolic steroid that is taken orally (often in tablet form). It was developed in 1955 to treat hypogonadism but is no longer used medically and is no longer legally available in many countries, including the United States. It can still be purchased in the United Kingdom and is often used as a performance enhancing drug (particularly by bodybuilders). Among its many side effects, it can cause serious liver damage.

The amount of epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone found in Whyte's "A" sample was very small. It could have been ingested as part of a supplement rather than the direct ingestion of Dianabol tablets. But the WADA standard for epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone is qualitative, not quantitative. In order words, any amount of epimethandienone or hydroxymethandienone in an athlete's system is a violation of the WADA code.
Dillian Whyte Tested Positive For Two Dianabol Metabolites



dillian-whyte%20(3)_6.jpg
 

The Ruler 09

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
38,018
Reputation
1,707
Daps
38,055
Reppin
NULL
based off zero facts?? lol okay

Dillian Whyte Tested Positive For Two Dianabol Metabolites
By Thomas Hauser
Published On Thu Jul 25, 2019, 01:45 PM EDT


By Thomas Hauser

Yesterday, July 24, BoxingScene.com reported that an "A" sample taken from Dillian Whyte by United Kingdom Anti-Doping (UKAD) tested positive for one or more banned substances prior to Whyte's July 20 fight in London against Oscar Rivas. BoxingScene has now confirmed that the substances were epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone, two metabolites of the banned drug Dianabol.

A metabolite is a byproduct of the body breaking down or metabolizing a drug into a different substance. When a drug is leaving the user's system, it leaves these intermediate end products.

Dianabol is an anabolic steroid that is taken orally (often in tablet form). It was developed in 1955 to treat hypogonadism but is no longer used medically and is no longer legally available in many countries, including the United States. It can still be purchased in the United Kingdom and is often used as a performance enhancing drug (particularly by bodybuilders). Among its many side effects, it can cause serious liver damage.

The amount of epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone found in Whyte's "A" sample was very small. It could have been ingested as part of a supplement rather than the direct ingestion of Dianabol tablets. But the WADA standard for epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone is qualitative, not quantitative. In order words, any amount of epimethandienone or hydroxymethandienone in an athlete's system is a violation of the WADA code.
Dillian Whyte Tested Positive For Two Dianabol Metabolites



dillian-whyte%20(3)_6.jpg

Article wasn't facts, been confirmed parts of the article isn't true. Learn what a fact is, would be simplier. The facts hopefully will come out. The facts are exactly what I said, he was cleared by both, what needs to be found out is WHY he was cleared by UKAD.
 

Black_Jesus

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
16,283
Reputation
723
Daps
21,270
Reppin
from the home of coca-cola, i'm not referring to s
Article wasn't facts, been confirmed parts of the article isn't true. Learn what a fact is, would be simplier. The facts hopefully will come out. The facts are exactly what I said, he was cleared by both, what needs to be found out is WHY he was cleared by UKAD.

Nothing you said in this post refutes anything posted in that article.. Try again
 
Top