- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 31,749
- Reputation
- 19,317
- Daps
- 120,136
- Reppin
- SOHH Icey HawkSet ByrdGang
They aren't African Americans than

i just thought you had to be african.....and american

They aren't African Americans than
then you factor in the mixing. what percentage of african-american do you have to have? one drop rule? if so, practically everyone will be able to claim (including "white people") and then when these same white people are asked for proof they'll give the same argument Say it Wit Ya Chest used ("we can't retrace it specifically because of slaveryyour analogy is a little flawed breh
if you worked for a company, and can prove you worked for that company as well as prove that company owes you money, you have every legal right to pursue the unpaid dues
even if you have a family member or ancestor in the same situation, as long as you can prove that company owes/owed money to that family member or ancestor, you can still pursue it legally....but here is where it starts to break down
for the vast majority of african americans, they cannot directly trace their lineages to specific slaves like you can, for one reason or another (africans being treated as items instead of people, intentional fabrication and destruction of records, relocation, miseducation etc)...so it quickly becomes a matter of burden of proof in the legal sense, and you can guarantee the government is gonna wanna see the receipts on any black person wanting reparations for their slave ancestors
of course it's easy for us to assume on a base rational level that african americans are byproducts of slavery, and for the most part that's correct and an ethical enough reason to deserve reparations, but you have to factor in the legality and logistics of it all....you also have other factors, like african americans that did not descend from slaves or immigrated to america on their own volition (if they sendin out checks i want one too god dammit)...do you think those african americans deserve reparations as well? or just the ones that directly descend from slaves?
the idea that the government would just skimp over the details and start givin checks to black folks just for being black and maybe being a descendant of a slave is much more idealistic than realistic
if anything, they would set the record department on fire before they crack open the books to figure out which black folks get reparations and which don't
its complicated. African American is an ethnicity just like Jamaican,kenyan etc. Many would consider you to be Eritrean-americanso you gotta be a descendant of the slave trade to be african american?
i just thought you had to be african.....and americanthis will surely be news to my family that came here from eritrea in the 80s, and identify as african american
i'm sayin, i hope that tomorrow they make reparations official and give every nikka $500kbut it's never happening, just vaguely thinking of the logistics of it is a nightmare
its complicated. African American is an ethnicity just like Jamaican,kenyan etc. Many would consider you to be Eritrean-american
your analogy is a little flawed breh
if you worked for a company, and can prove you worked for that company as well as prove that company owes you money, you have every legal right to pursue the unpaid dues
even if you have a family member or ancestor in the same situation, as long as you can prove that company owes/owed money to that family member or ancestor, you can still pursue it legally....but here is where it starts to break down
for the vast majority of african americans, they cannot directly trace their lineages to specific slaves like you can, for one reason or another (africans being treated as items instead of people, intentional fabrication and destruction of records, relocation, miseducation etc)...so it quickly becomes a matter of burden of proof in the legal sense, and you can guarantee the government is gonna wanna see the receipts on any black person wanting reparations for their slave ancestors
of course it's easy for us to assume on a base rational level that african americans are byproducts of slavery, and for the most part that's correct and an ethical enough reason to deserve reparations, but you have to factor in the legality and logistics of it all....you also have other factors, like african americans that did not descend from slaves or immigrated to america on their own volition (if they sendin out checks i want one too god dammit)...do you think those african americans deserve reparations as well? or just the ones that directly descend from slaves?
the idea that the government would just skimp over the details and start givin checks to black folks just for being black and maybe being a descendant of a slave is much more idealistic than realistic
if anything, they would set the record department on fire before they crack open the books to figure out which black folks get reparations and which don't
I know but where does that leave black americans(descendants of American slaves) that have created their own separate culture in this countrythat's crazyi never seen Eritrean-American on the census
African American implies you're an American citizen with African heritage...this connotation that it only is for certain types of Africans is some divisive nonsense breh![]()
welfare is basically reparations for our women and all those men in prison don't have to pay for food or housing.![]()
Proving this company owes me money is the easy part, that's actually the part that was used to come up with that trillion dollar figure.your analogy is a little flawed breh
if you worked for a company, and can prove you worked for that company as well as prove that company owes you money, you have every legal right to pursue the unpaid dues
even if you have a family member or ancestor in the same situation, as long as you can prove that company owes/owed money to that family member or ancestor, you can still pursue it legally....but here is where it starts to break down
for the vast majority of african americans, they cannot directly trace their lineages to specific slaves like you can, for one reason or another (africans being treated as items instead of people, intentional fabrication and destruction of records, relocation, miseducation etc)...so it quickly becomes a matter of burden of proof in the legal sense, and you can guarantee the government is gonna wanna see the receipts on any black person wanting reparations for their slave ancestors
of course it's easy for us to assume on a base rational level that african americans are byproducts of slavery, and for the most part that's correct and an ethical enough reason to deserve reparations, but you have to factor in the legality and logistics of it all....you also have other factors, like african americans that did not descend from slaves or immigrated to america on their own volition (if they sendin out checks i want one too god dammit)...do you think those african americans deserve reparations as well? or just the ones that directly descend from slaves?
the idea that the government would just skimp over the details and start givin checks to black folks just for being black and maybe being a descendant of a slave is much more idealistic than realistic
if anything, they would set the record department on fire before they crack open the books to figure out which black folks get reparations and which don't