I'm embarrassed for you, my bro, because you're completely incapable of not only of using the appropriate context, but understanding it when it's pointed out to you, over and over and over, again. It's how you got yourself in a tangle to typing out the nonsense of Zion (now) having a better jumpshot than Chuck (at any point of his career) because you don't understand how to contextualize stats nor are you cognizant of the nature of the game, itself. I've debunked your argument and drowned your logic, and yet you come back with the same shyt, as if you didn't process what I wrote.
It's like you're stuck on a loop.
And no, the number of jumpshots he took last season is not an adequate sample size, for the simple fact that they only made up 18% of his total shots, most of which were uncontested. You can't then use other players' 3-pt stats as a contrast or tie-in point, not only for the fact that 3-pt shots are not the only demonstration of a jumpshot (most, if not, all of those players you brought up, took a far greater ratio of jumpshots inside the arc against Zion's jumpshots inside the arc), but those players you referenced don't handle the ball to the same degree that Zion did, and therefore, they don't get the same opportunities to pick and choose when to shoot the ball.
If Zion really had a jumpshot like you believe he does, then for someone who handled the ball as much as he did, he would've been taking around six jumpshots per game (not around two per game), which would be around 40% of his total shots, and they'd need to be against defensive pressure.
I mean take JJJ for instance, you brought up him only taking and making 38 out of 96 threes in college (40% completion rate), as means to suggest that because Zion attempted 3s at a similar mark, I should be of the belief because JJJ can shoot, that Zion can too. But you see, JJJ didn't get the ball enough to shoot the ball more than that - he didn't have the luxury of picking and choosing when to shoot like Zion did - he had to make do with the minimal amount possessions he received, and he had greater defensive pressure when he did shoot (as opposed to Zion who was given a shooting cushion).
JJJ's total jumpshots in college made up around 50% of his total shots, whereas Zion's jumpshots only made up 18% of his total shots, and this is with Zion getting to pick when exactly he wanted to shoot the ball, and not like JJJ who was put in positions where he had to shoot the ball when he received it.
How many times do I need to reiterate this before you understand?
And this is all without mentioning that JJJ is 6'11" - he doesn't need a jumpshot to the same degree that someone who's 6'6" does. If Zion was the same size as JJJ, then his lack of a jumpshot wouldn't be such an issue.
Ask yourself: how many 6'6" (and below) players in NBA history have dominated the league without a jumpshot?
But regardless of all that, Zion's shot is mechanically flawed and will probably need a near-complete makeover once he gets acclimated into the league; similar to Lonzo who got his shyt tweaked by Vinson. There's a reason why he's had three games against NBA competition, and yet he's only taken four shots outside of 5-ft, and he missed all of them.
It's basically a countdown until we see him hit an actual jumpshot against NBA talent.
, HE GETS PAST HIS DEFENDER OFF THE 1ST OR 2ND DRIBBLE.
. 
