Black awareness, ehh?
fukk is this shyt?
Get this dumb shyt out of here.
lol, he right about illuminati Doncic
YouTube to Remove Thousands of Videos Pushing Extreme Views
lol, he right about illuminati Doncic
https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/DS_Alternative_Influence.pdf
These free speech internet safe spaces are breeding ground for Nazis,its all very nasty,these shameless grifters literally deal in hate and murder.
These free speech internet safe spaces are breeding ground for Nazis,its all very nasty,these shameless grifters literally deal in hate and murder.
Oh okay...
Luka Doncic....
Oh shyt...
He was the seed of an unholy union between Larry Bird and Lucifer's harem.
The demon Spawn was born, and at birth had red skin and horse hooves.
As a result they named him after Lucifer and a donkey...Luka Doncic.
In an unadapted section of Revelations, John warns of a prophet with the gift of passage - as reference to the passing of a basketball.
Brehs...the 4 horseman are upon us....
OLD TOWN ROAD - HORSES? - IT WAS A WARNING!!!
Shoog Shatmi
All Star
It's my duty to stifle and frustrate my enemies. And you're caping for the "rights" of people whose propaganda is aimed at leaving you with no rights (if you are black).
And "goofy supremacists" like Dylan Roof were radicalized by shyt they read online.
You're not proposing any solutions to deal with neo-Nazis, white supremacists, or misogynists on YouTube and other platforms.
Despite that, you see fit to loudly proclaim that YouTube proactively de-platforming extremists is wrong.
You're arguing that it's important that neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and misogynists have an outlet or domestic terrorism will increase, despite that:
A. Neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and misogynists have more outlets than any time in history due to the internet, and
B. Domestic terrorism has been on the rise in correlation with access to outlets that host extreme content*
...And I'm the one making "thinly veiled whataboutisms"?
*Correlation does not imply causation, but I think there is a causal link between the rise of domestic terrorism and access to the internet/social media.
Basil of Baker Street
Banned
What is it due to, then? Certainly it's not because they lack an outlet for their extremism; you just listed several popular outlets for extreme content.
Do extremists have more of a voice than they did in past times, or less?
How do you explain the Nazi genocide, Cambodian genocide, Native American genocide..etc.
If there is a will there is a way. Ain't shyt change.
The best thing you can do is let them talk but what you also do is have public discourse to convince everyone why a certain way of thinking is wrong.
Answer this simple question.
If for whatever reason a group found what you said was wrong and stifled your speech what is your next step? What would you go honestly do?
Shoog Shatmi
All Star
Basil of Baker Street
Banned
He can read that shyt in a book. The radical will ALWAYS exist just like light cannot exist without darkness.
Breh people can think the same exact way about you and decide to shut you up.
Freedom of speech but my speech is more free than others..that's what you're saying.
I'm not caping for anyone. I'm caping for freedom of thought and speech.
Most of the school shootings happened because dudes was mentally unstable and hated people. Also who is to decide what is extreme views on such a personal site like YouTube. And I rather have knowledge of how the so called extremists thinks than be blind to it
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Shoog Shatmi
All Star
Freedom of speech has never meant, nor should it mean, that anyone is obligated to publish your speech. Go start your own YouTube.
JuvenileHell
Veteran
You're not proposing any solutions to deal with neo-Nazis, white supremacists, or misogynists on YouTube and other platforms.
Despite that, you see fit to loudly proclaim that YouTube proactively de-platforming extremists is wrong.
You're arguing that it's important that neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and misogynists have an outlet or domestic terrorism will increase, despite that:
A. Neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and misogynists have more outlets than any time in history due to the internet, and
B. Domestic terrorism has been on the rise in correlation with access to outlets that host extreme content*
...And I'm the one making "thinly veiled whataboutisms"?
*Correlation does not imply causation, but I think there is a causal link between the rise of domestic terrorism and access to the internet/social media.
The bolded is pretty much the most important thing to note here. Folks advocating for "free speech" never provide any kind of resolution when it comes to dealing with the scum you mentioned above. Black people are just supposed to "debate" WS all day and then just walk away with no resolution, all the while having to be fearful of said WS being able to push their agenda freely. But it's supposed to be all good because there was "dialogue"
The end game for Neo-nazi's, white supremacists and other trash that warp the idea of free speech is to make their horrid ideas more palatable by trying to just present them as "just opinions bro" as if people aren't literally killed behind those ideas.
...yeah. And it's gotten worse, since they have means on public forums like YouTube to radicalize themselves and spread their views to others.
...YouTube.
Which is what they're doing. The f*ck?
I'd rather that extremists not be able to take a dump in the middle of Times Square.
Besides this, there are too many gullible people in the world for me to trust people to compartmentalize extremist ideas properly.
Scustin Bieburr
Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
They ain't gonna do shyt. They already have rules against hate speech and violent content, they dont enforce that.
They want props for announcing that theyll enforce their own rule?
They want props for announcing that theyll enforce their own rule?
In each one of those cases, the people doing the killing were in control of the discourse. :bpdahell: