YouTube to blame for rise in flat Earth believers, says study

[Black Panther]

Honestly how are people like @xCivicx function in life?

How can someone become an idiot like him?

-Echo chambers
-Confirmation bias
-Dunning-Kruger effect

 

[xCivicx]

Honestly how are people like @xCivicx function in life?

How can someone become an idiot like him?

Dont quote me with passive aggression please

Just continue to play the background like you're supposed to

The next useless sassy post you make with my name in it you'll be the very first person I ever put on ignore on here

 

[5n0man]

Yall keep saying that theres never any evidence being posted yet yall seem to be afraid to actually bump any of the multiple flat earth threads

This so called evidence relies on refusing to believe any evidence of the contrary.

For example.

Everything in your field of vision converges to a single point directly in front of you at a certain fixed distance. You supposedly being able to see the sun when its thousands of miles away, WAY past the convergence point for objects that are MUCH CLOSER to you does make any sense

When an object is as big and bright as the sun, it would still be visible from any place on a flat earth. But your argument relies on the belief that the sun isnt very big at all(something you cant prove) so a debate on the matter wouldn't go anywhere.

 

[xCivicx]

-Echo chambers
-Confirmation bias
-Dunning-Kruger effect

Where are these echo chambers?

I stand alone in my fact-based beliefs

I don't need anyone to help me prove something I personally already know to be true

Look at how you're wracking your brain trying to make my posts about anything and everything except the facts presented in my posts

If the atmosphere is responsible for obstructing our view of the stars from earth, why are no stars visible in photos taken from the atmosphere-less vacuum of space, where the stars should be their brightest?

I'm asking you directly

 

[Black Panther]

If the atmosphere is responsible for obstructing our view of the stars from earth, why are no stars visible in photos taken from the atmosphere-less vacuum of space, where the stars should be their brightest?

For the same reason why you can see more stars in the wilderness, away from civilization, than you can in the middle of Times Square.

You are aware the Earth both reflects and gives off light, correct?

 

[AndroidHero]

Dont quote me with passive aggression please

I @ you directly to call you an idiot nothing passive about that.

The next useless sassy post you make with my name in it you'll be the very first person I ever put on ignore on here

Oh no this will be a huge lose for me!!

 

[Propaganda]

Again, disrespect aside, all I see are celestial bodies in the sky, and that's all you see too

You can call them whatever you want but you've never been up there to verify what any of those lights in the sky

Why is it that you're so sure that what you see above you are "galaxies"?

Why are you so confident that you saw a robot rolling around on Mars? You were given a video clip and told what it was. No one actual provides any evidence proving that said robot was on Mars

You were just told it was there and you believed it

yeah that's what i'm saying! if you haven't gone somewhere yourself, if you haven't done something yourself, if you haven't verified yourself, then don't believe it! ignore millenniums of collective human knowledge, experience and accomplishments brehs! and something something about white people too!
i haven't been to australia, so why should i believe it actually exists? cuz the white man said so?


i haven't done no triple-sow-cow, and you expect me to just accept that figure skating really exists? whitey please!
i haven't performed open-heart surgery either, y'all think i'm gonna buy that bullshyt? nice try cac!

 

[xCivicx]

This so called evidence relies on refusing to believe any evidence of the contrary.

For example.


When an object is as big and bright as the sun, it would still be visible from any place on a flat earth. But your argument relies on the belief that the sun isnt very big at all so a debate on the matter wouldn't go anywhere.

It's not my fault that you believe the sun to be hundreds of times the size of the moon in opposition to your own senses that show you that its equal in size to the moon

This is yet another case of you guys attempting to fit the round flat earth plane peg into the square hole of heliocentric theory

Once you actually make an effort to unlearn the indoctrination and actually understand what I'm saying, things will make a lot more sense to you

You cannot PROVE that the sun is as gigantic as you BELIEVE it to be, you just CHOOSE to BELIEVE it's a certain size when a lot of evidence points to the contrary

For yet another example, a massive object of light that's supposedly 93 million light years away should be projecting light Ray's at the earth at ONLY perpendicular/right angles, like this

And if this is in fact true, then photos like this SHOULD NOT be possible in the heliocentric model PERIOD

Anyone who has taken even the lowest level trigonometry/geometry classes in middle school knows that you can utilize angles to calculate distance, but you dont even need to calculate anything to see that the sun literally cannot be almost 100,000,0000 miles away yet create the angles that we see every day through the clouds

So again, you're not gonna try and shame me onto believing something that you cannot prove AND that can be disproved with basic level math

 

[xCivicx]

yeah that's what i'm saying! if you haven't gone somewhere yourself, if you haven't done something yourself, if you haven't verified yourself, then don't believe it! ignore millenniums of collective human knowledge, experience and accomplishments brehs! and something something about white people too!
i haven't been to australia, so why should i believe it actually exists? cuz the white man said so?


i haven't done no triple-sow-cow, and you expect me to just accept that figure skating really exists? whitey please!
i haven't performed open-heart surgery either, y'all think i'm gonna buy that bullshyt? nice try cac!

Another sassy af post that has absolutely nothing to do with the thread

It's funny how proud yall are of having blind faith in scienctism, but in the same breath you'll disrespect a religious person, as if you're not displaying religious devotion to scientific concepts/thoeries that have never been conclusively proven

Also, we can ban bet on the bold if you're not too p*ssy to stand by your words

 

[xCivicx]

For the same reason why you can see more stars in the wilderness, away from civilization, than you can in the middle of Times Square.

You are aware the Earth both reflects and gives off light, correct?

You're contradicting yourself in this post

Because just like you JUST said, the less atmospheric obstruction there is, the more stars we see, yet there are NO stars visible in ANY official photo from space, even when the sun is supposedly on the EXACT OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE EARTH from the place where the photo is being taken, meaning the photo should be being taken while the camera is COMPLETELY in the earths shadow

So again, why cant we see any stars in these photos, where the earth isnt reflecting any light from the sun and the stars should be at their brightest?

 

[[Something Cool]]

Haha I might regret posting in this thread but:

Virgin Galactic space plane takes first test passenger into space

Once these type of trips become more accessible to the general populace in a few decades ($250,000k now) this dumb ass debate can end and you guys can continue arguing about the moon landing...

 

[Kuro]

It's not my fault that you believe the sun to be hundreds of times the size of the moon in opposition to your own senses that show you that its equal in size to the moon

This is yet another case of you guys attempting to fit the round flat earth plane peg into the square hole of heliocentric theory

Once you actually make an effort to unlearn the indoctrination and actually understand what I'm saying, things will make a lot more sense to you

You cannot PROVE that the sun is as gigantic as you BELIEVE it to be, you just CHOOSE to BELIEVE it's a certain size when a lot of evidence points to the contrary

For yet another example, a massive object of light that's supposedly 93 million light years away should be projecting light Ray's at the earth at ONLY perpendicular/right angles, like this

And if this is in fact true, then photos like this SHOULD NOT be possible in the heliocentric model PERIOD

Anyone who has taken even the lowest level trigonometry/geometry classes in middle school knows that you can utilize angles to calculate distance, but you dont even need to calculate anything to see that the sun literally cannot be almost 100,000,0000 miles away yet create the angles that we see every day through the clouds

So again, you're not gonna try and shame me onto believing something that you cannot prove AND that can be disproved with basic level math

those "angles" are made by the clouds...it is obvious the rays of light are passing only thru the openings in the clouds...those "angles" have nothing to do with the distance of the sun from the earth...i can use the blinds on my windows to make sunlight that enters my apt go in one direction or another...

 

[xCivicx]

those "angles" are made by the clouds...it is obvious the rays of light are passing only thru the openings in the clouds...those "angles" have nothing to do with the distance of the sun from the earth...i can use the blinds on my windows to make sunlight that enters my apt go in one direction or another...

If that's the case then we should be seeing those sun rays being projected randomly through the clouds all over the sky at random points

But again, that's not the case

Every time I see this image of sun rays through clouds, ALL of the rays trace back to the exact same point

Can you produce a photo of these sun rays projecting through the clouds at random points in the sky?

 

[Propaganda]

Another sassy af post that has absolutely nothing to do with the thread

It's funny how proud yall are of having blind faith in scienctism, but in the same breath you'll disrespect a religious person, as if you're not displaying religious devotion to scientific concepts/thoeries that have never been conclusively proven

Also, we can ban bet on the bold if you're not too p*ssy to stand by your words

nah, my post didn't have nothing to do with the thread, it's mocking some of the pillars of your anti-science arguments.

just because you refuse to accept scientific concepts/theories and the mountains of evidence supporting them doesn't mean they aren't true or haven't been conclusively proven. if you don't want to believe that grass is green, go for it, but it doesn't change the fact.

i don't know what you're trying to say about the ban bet.

 

[xCivicx]

Haha I might regret posting in this thread but:

Virgin Galactic space plane takes first test passenger into space

Once these type of trips become more accessible to the general populace in a few decades ($250,000k now) this dumb ass debate can end and you guys can continue arguing about the moon landing...

Not a single photo from space shown

Like usual

As I said before, you can choose to be as gullible as you wanna be

I require evidence

Someone saying "I went to space" is not evidence. Those are just words