YouTube to blame for rise in flat Earth believers, says study

[Gus Money]

You can decipher "authority" from text?

Why do y'all get so sassy over this topic?

If you think I'm full of shyt then just put me on ignore. I don't mind

But what you're not gonna do is try and diminish my stance without proving your own stance smh

Bump one of the flat earth threads in TLR

I'm sure it'll be different than that one

You don’t have to defend yourself to me, buddy. Don’t waste your time.

 

[Poetical Poltergeist]

okay..... so..... the AREA.... the PHYSICAL PLACE...... that the earth and whatever the lights in the sky are in.......... why won't you call it SPACE?

I don't think he believes "space" exists and the sun and moon are actually in our atmosphere. Not millions of miles away. I could be wrong but I saw some flat earth shyt like that. Where the earth is flat but circular and the sun rotates around the circular plane somehow.

Idk But he keeps saying that stars should be seen and since no stars are seen then it's a cgi picture.

I don't know shyt tho.

 

[5n0man]

Civicx never post anything to prove what he says, just arrogant snarky comments. Just post a pic of the flat earth or STFU.

There really isnt any point in debating flat earthers because they just make claims about the earth being flat with no evidence, the burden lies on you to prove the earth isnt flat, which isnt possible cause they dont believe anything.

 

[5n0man]

I don't think he believes "space" exists and the sun and moon are actually in our atmosphere. Not millions of miles away. I could be wrong but I saw some flat earth shyt like that. Where the earth is flat but circular and the sun rotates around the circular plane somehow.

Idk But he keeps saying that stars should be seen and since no stars are seen then it's a cgi picture.

I don't know shyt tho.

If the earth was flat and the sun just circled around it, you'd be able to see the sun at all times regardless of the time of day.

Stars aren't visible in pictures due to the way cameras work, light from the sun and reflecting off the earth are too bright, kinda like how stars are more visible in areas that aren't brightly lit than they are in a city.

Stars are very dim and the light reflected by the Earth and the Moon is just so much brighter. To take good pictures in space you need to have a high shutter speed and a very short exposure, which means our planet and satellite are clearly visible but the stars often can't be seen.

On top of the unusual light conditions in space, there’s another factor, which requires rapid reaction times from the camera. The ISS moves at 8 kilometers per second (17,150 mph) which is great for staying in orbit but less so for not-shaky images.

This information is a Google search away but flat earthers refuse to believe it, which makes these debates extremely pointless. You go back and forth with them with this information until you get tired of it.

 

[New Jeruzalem Journalist]

You can literally see Andromeda, another fukking GALAXY, with the naked eye, observe the actual physical remnants from the Chicxulab crater, watch a robot's journey on Martian soil, and somehow still debate people who claim space is fake...............while rebutting the model of a spherical earth ON THEIR CELL PHONE.

There's not a chance in hell dude is serious. I don't get the entertainment value in trolling people online with silliness like flat earth arguments, but it's whatever as long as they're not put in positions of influence or allowed to reproduce.

 

[Lord Beasley]

Thousands of years from now we'll look back at this time period as a weird in-between era where we were making significant advances in science and technology and yet still had a large group of people clinging to the literal interpretation of stone aged mythology (Religion)

i doubt it...

 

[Won Won]

Stop arguing with someone who still asks Fisher Price questions like “how come I can’t see any stars?”

 

[Black Panther]

I've heard that most Flat Earthers are actually intelligent, insofar as they have a reasonable interest in science...

...the problem is that their single-mindedness on the Earth being flat (with no evidence) undermines that intelligence.

It's like if a veteran porn star only focused on f*cking turkey sandwiches...you've probably perfected your stroke game doing so...but it'd be better if you'd focus those energies on real women.

Spoiler

:bpdame:

 

[xCivicx]

okay..... so..... the AREA.... the PHYSICAL PLACE...... that the earth and whatever the lights in the sky are in.......... why won't you call it SPACE?

Because space is a construct of heliocentrism

You keep trying to place a flat plane in "space" meaning you're trying to fit flat earth into the heliocentric model

The entire heliocentric model is incorrect. Space is a fabrication. It didnt exist until the first mason started pushing heliocentric theory. No one has been more than a couple miles above the plane as far as I can see

Once again, stop thinking you can fit the concept of flat earth into the heliocentric model because the flat earth model is almost the antithesis of the heliocentric model

Whatever is beyond the boundaries around us, it's not "outer space"

Understanding flat earth requires unlearning a lot of indoctrination. "Outer space" is a part of that indoctrination

 

[xCivicx]

You don’t have to defend yourself to me, buddy. Don’t waste your time.

I wasnt defending myself

I'm asking you to either converse like a man or put me on ignore

The passive aggression in your posts is extremely immature

 

[xCivicx]

There really isnt any point in debating flat earthers because they just make claims about the earth being flat with no evidence, the burden lies on you to prove the earth isnt flat, which isnt possible cause they dont believe anything.

Then why are there 10+ flat earth threads if no information is ever presented?

That would make yall pretty silly for making such redundant threads, since it's usually globe earthers that start flat earth threads to try and discredit the concept

Theres plenty of evidence that the earth is flat and unmoving

I know because I've been the one posting it

Yall keep saying that theres never any evidence being posted yet yall seem to be afraid to actually bump any of the multiple flat earth threads

Why is that?

 

[xCivicx]

If the earth was flat and the sun just circled around it, you'd be able to see the sun at all times regardless of the time of day.

Stars aren't visible in pictures due to the way cameras work, light from the sun and reflecting off the earth are too bright, kinda like how stars are more visible in areas that aren't brightly lit than they are in a city.



This information is a Google search away but flat earthers refuse to believe it, which makes these debates extremely pointless. You go back and forth with them with this information until you get tired of it.

Smh none of this is correct

Theres a concept called "perspective" that you probably need to do some research on
This is how your eyesight works

Everything in your field of vision converges to a single point directly in front of you at a certain fixed distance. You supposedly being able to see the sun when its thousands of miles away, WAY past the convergence point for objects that are MUCH CLOSER to you does make any sense

The human eye can only see so far, that distance is <100 miles on average. On top of that, the atmoshephere itself at the ground level obstructs the view of objects that are a certain distance away

The circumference of the earth is 25,000 miles and the diameter is ~ 8000 miles away

Why you think you should be able to see the sun when its 1000+ miles away from you makes absolutely no sense, unless you can point to another object that you can see with your naked eye that's 1000+ miles away at ground level

And if the high powered cameras you speak of are still subject to "atmospheric refractions" then they are unfit and invalid scientific tools period and shouldnt be used for any scientific measuring since they are still inherently flawed

That also doesnt change the fact that the higher elevation you are, the less atmosphere you're looking through, the more stars you can see with your naked eye

Yet this principle supposedly randomly doesnt apply to cameras, instruments that are modeled after the human eye with enhanced magnification levels

In other words, the argument that the camera "cant see the stars" is invalid

 

[xCivicx]

You can literally see Andromeda, another fukking GALAXY, with the naked eye, observe the actual physical remnants from the Chicxulab crater, watch a robot's journey on Martian soil, and somehow still debate people who claim space is fake...............while rebutting the model of a spherical earth ON THEIR CELL PHONE.

There's not a chance in hell dude is serious. I don't get the entertainment value in trolling people online with silliness like flat earth arguments, but it's whatever as long as they're not put in positions of influence or allowed to reproduce.

Again, disrespect aside, all I see are celestial bodies in the sky, and that's all you see too

You can call them whatever you want but you've never been up there to verify what any of those lights in the sky

Why is it that you're so sure that what you see above you are "galaxies"?

Why are you so confident that you saw a robot rolling around on Mars? You were given a video clip and told what it was. No one actual provides any evidence proving that said robot was on Mars

You were just told it was there and you believed it

 

[xCivicx]

I've heard that most Flat Earthers are actually intelligent, insofar as they have a reasonable interest in science...

...the problem is that their single-mindedness on the Earth being flat (with no evidence) undermines that intelligence.

It's like if a veteran porn star only focused on f*cking turkey sandwiches...you've probably perfected your stroke game doing so...but it'd be better if you'd focus those energies on real women.

Spoiler

:bpdame:

You cant prove the earth is a globe though...

Supposedly were rotating at ~1000mph, while revolving around the sun at ~66,000mph, while revolving around the galaxy at ~ 1,000,000mph, while the galaxy moves though space at multiple millions of mph(and we feel none of these motions btw)

So can someone tell me why the constellations have always remained in the EXACT SAME POSITIONS at the EXACT SAME TIMES, year in and year out, for multiple millenia?

The constellations shouldnt even exist within the heliocentric model

The night sky should look COMPLETELY DIFFERENT from night to night, as our position in "space" is supposedly literally millions of miles away from our position the the night before, and we're supposedly at a COMPLETELY different 3 dimensional rotational angle than the night before, meaning our parallax with respect to the stars should be COMPLETELY, MEASURABLY different from the night before

 

[Black Panther]

You cant prove the earth is a globe though...

Post pics of the flat earth champ