YouTube to blame for rise in flat Earth believers, says study
- Thread starter DEAD7
- Start date
good and free cause i know you need it 
I have no opinion besides the fact that yall are gullible
The science priests are now saying that theres evidence of the moon reacting directly to particles within the earths atmosphere, while simultaneously still claiming that the moon is 200,000+ miles away, implying that the earths atmosphere also extends 200,00+ miles into the vacuum of space
Does this make sense to you?
It makes more sense to me that the moon interacts with our atmosphere because its MUCH closer and MUCH smaller than what you're being told
The fundamentals of physics do not apply to the moon being in the earths atmosphere at all smh
Your posts in here have been generally genuinely disappointing
You came in here as if you were some authority on the topic(which I already knew was a lie because a chemical engineer isnt required to take anything higher than maybe physics II at GT, last I checked) but not only have you not actually added any intellectual value to this thread, you've been making the same painstakingly average troll posts as your less intelligent fans
Please dont quote me anymore unless you have something of value to contribute thanks
Let me ask u a question. What do you do for a living? How much do you make? Reason i ask is because the first person to organize an expedition to discover this ice wall at edge of the earth and proves the earth is flat will become the most famous person of this generation. Money on top of money, youre name is handed down to children generations from now, they will sing songs and have days off from school in your honor.
But you wont do that
Neither will your brethen
Cowards and idiots, thats who believes this flat earth nonsense. Meanwhile our military is harversting opium cause the us military is the worlds number one drug enforcer. Starting to believe anybody online serioulsy espousing this flat earth nonsense is a government paid agent trying to discredit conspiracies as a whole. Or just plain stupid.
So @xCivicx when u loading up the hot air baloon and guns? shouldnt take more than that to prove this theory
Officially I am adept at:
The basic physics (Force and Vectors, Momentum and Impulse, Electromagnetism, Wave nature of light and its applications)
Fluid Mechanics
Statics and Dynamics
Quantum Mechanics
Physical and Organic Chemistry
Phase and Reaction Equilibria (Thermodynamics)
Mathematical Modeling and Simulation theory
Process Control Logic and Implementation
I'm not going to go into heavy detail because it would be laborious.
I'll ask you two simple questions that will answer your question if you're as sharp as you say:
What is dust? What causes the formation of it? :vwhite:
Also because it's been annoying to see you post this over and over
Heliocentrism - The belief that the planets revolve around the sun (Sun is the center of the universe) is a debate from antiquity where most astrologers believed the Earth to be the center of the universe.
The only thing that was proven was that the planets are in gravitational orbit around the sun.
As far as a "center of the universe" there is no such thing as of right now. The closest thing that MAY be the center is known as the Shapely Attractor
Heliocentrism - The belief that the planets revolve around the sun (Sun is the center of the universe) is a debate from antiquity where most astrologers believed the Earth to be the center of the universe.
The only thing that was proven was that the planets are in gravitational orbit around the sun.
As far as a "center of the universe" there is no such thing as of right now. The closest thing that MAY be the center is known as the Shapely Attractor
To those of you who have a hard time visualizing gravity. This is arguably the best video to explain it.
that said, Gravity is still not necessarily a "force"
that said, Gravity is still not necessarily a "force"
The ice wall is a heavily restricted area
Restricted by all major governments
Next deflection you post, you're going on ignore
you're about to go back where you came from
you want answers? Take the course I gave you and learn from that science priest
Bro, I told you you have a problem with scale and here you go again. They said at the moon it's .2 hydrogen atoms per cubic centimeter and is effectively a vacuum. The "news" is that they were able to detect anything at all. "Atmosphere" has a very loose interpretation at that point.
Your argument apparently is that its not a theoretically perfect vacuum (which doesn't exist).
Your mind works like the moon is passing through clouds and shyt
Low Quality Posting
I didn't use the term "atmosphere"
Your science priests did
Dont speak to me about scale
Go address them about their choice of words
Because there are some of us who actually know what words mean
But notice how yall blindly accept whatever nonsense they tell yall then have the nerve to try and shame anyone for being skeptical, even though skepticism is literally a fundamental principle of the scientific method smh