YouTube to blame for rise in flat Earth believers, says study

[xCivicx]

Ait, so no matter what I say you wont believe me.

occam'z razor

The simplest explanation to you is that we're moving at millions of mph through an infinite nothing that started when an infinitely small nothing exploded our reality into existence??

But ok, ignore the cgi stuff that I said

Why are there no stars or satellites or space debris in the pic you posted?

 

[Black Panther]

A nobody that you have consistently failed to out debate

A nobody who you go out of your way to troll about flat earth, in non flat earth threads

A nobody that got you furiously clicking that neg button with tears in your eyes

Whatever you need to tell yourself, breh

Have fun screaming into the void

 

[xCivicx]

Whatever you need to tell yourself, breh

Have fun screaming into the void

I'm not the one that goes out of my way to get your attention in completely random threads

This is all just 1 big deflection from the topic, in which you have failed once again to make a case for your faith based belief system though

 

[Insensitive]

YouTube is to blame for the dissemination of other ideas, some of them can even be classified as harmful.


All it takes is an insulated online community and a talking head for them to gather around.

 

[swerve]

The simplest explanation to you is that we're moving at millions of mph through an infinite nothing that started when an infinitely small nothing exploded our reality into existence??

But ok, ignore the cgi stuff that I said

Why are there no stars or satellites or space debris in the pic you posted?

Because it’s from 1972 and it is taken thousands of miles from earth. If it’s cgi they could’ve easily added the debris. Or they forgot?

Ayo answer this, why is the sun moon and all other objects you can see through a telescope round? But the earth is flat

 

[xCivicx]

Because it’s from 1972 and it is taken thousands of miles from earth. If it’s cgi they could’ve easily added the debris. Or they forgot? Ayo answer this, why is the sun moon and all other objects you can see through a telescope round? But the earth is flat

You're deflecting

Why are there no stars or satellites or space debris in this pic that you just posted?

now you show me as credible proof

Also, what you mean to say is that you believe that the lights you see in the sky are 3 dimensional spheres, which there is absolute no proof of

All you see are circular objects in the sky.

You cannot determine that they are 3 dimensional with any accuracy

The flat plane of earth is also circular

 

[swerve]

You're deflecting

Why are there no stars or satellites or space debris in this pic that you just posted?

Also, what you mean to say is that you believe that the lights you see in the sky are 3 dimensional spheres, which there is absolute no proof of

All you see are circular objects in the sky.

You cannot determine that they are 3 dimensional with any accuracy

The flat plane of earth is also circular

I’m deflecting so you’re saying all objects in the sky are, against all odds, faced towards earth?


The reason there’s no light are due to exposure. Why are there no stars in the sky if you’re surrounded by light?

 

[xCivicx]

I’m deflecting so you’re saying all objects in the sky are, against all odds, faced towards earth?


The reason there’s no light are due to exposure. Why are there no stars in the sky if you’re surrounded by light?

That's not correct though

It's common knowledge that the higher your elevation on earth, the less atmosphere obstructing your view, the more stars you can see.

How is it that you see more stars the higher you go, yet once you enter space, and theres no atmosphere, there are absolutely 0 stars visible?

They even make sure to put stars in space video games, yet apparently high powered cameras can't capture them

The stars should be at their absolut brightest in the vacuum of space

And yes, everything we see in the sky is faced towards us imo

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

That's not correct though

It's common knowledge that the higher your elevation on earth, the less atmosphere obstructing your view, the more stars you can see.

How is it that you see more stars the higher you go, yet once you enter space, and theres no atmosphere, there are absolutely 0 stars visible?

They even make sure to put stars in space video games, yet apparently high powered cameras can't capture them

The stars should be at their absolut brightest in the vacuum of space

And yes, everything we see in the sky is faced towards us imo

people have explained camera aperture to you many times. you've either forgotten that, misunderstood that, deliberately ignored that out of stubbornness, or you are a troll

 

[xCivicx]

people have explained camera aperture to you many times. you've either forgotten that, misunderstood that, deliberately ignored that out of stubbornness, or you are a troll

If camera aperture creates the optical illusion of no stars in space, then cameras are invalid scientific tools and no photo taken with a camera in space can be trusted

Either way, camera aperture doesnt explain the lack of satellites in space photos at all

Feel free to try again though

Also, the fact that stars should be at their brightest in "space" comes from your heliocentric "scientists", not flat earthers

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

If camera aperture creates the optical illusion of no stars in space, then cameras are invalid scientific tools and no photo taken with a camera in space can be trusted

you've switched from "all the pictures are fake" to "even the real pictures can't be trusted"

 

[protestor]

@xCivicx looks at the sun and the moon.

"They look the same size from here, they are obvious Lying to us"

 

[xCivicx]

you've switched from "all the pictures are fake" to "even the real pictures can't be trusted"

Nah I'm just explaining to you why the pics you see from "space cameras" aren't real

 

[xCivicx]

@xCivicx looks at the sun and the moon.

"They look the same size from here, they are obvious Lying to us"

Before the indoctrination, would you have guessed that the sun was exactly 400x larger than the moon AND exactly 400x the distance from us that the moon is?

No you would not have

400/400 = 1

There's literally no mathematical difference between the sun being 400x away and 400x the distance, and the sun being the exact same size and distance from the earth as the moon is...

You just choose to believe the more complicated option

 

[Pressure]