Who and how? Kobe isn't even better just going off the eye test.Actual experts have Kobe ranked higher
Who and how? Kobe isn't even better just going off the eye test.Actual experts have Kobe ranked higher
You did? Kobe was not a player who needed to retire to be liked, especially not here.Saw this happen with Kobe.
So every thread with Bron as subject has to be shytting on him?The Stains are in this thread deep. Got to abort![]()
Haters take up way more real estate online and on this site.
Yall stay exaggerating the over the top behavior of Lebron fans.
perception wisethink the coli is reality brehs. Lebron is consensus top 2 of all time and will have a legitimate case for GOAT when he hangs it up since he continues to break records and accrue accolades into his late 30s. He's the best 18 year old to ever play and he was an MVP candidate in his 18th season. That type of longevity will likely never be replicated. Only people devaluing him are dudes that are stuck in the past.
Makes me think tho, I get he’s a once in a lifetime athlete.There maybe players faster than Lebron or Stronger than Lebron but the players who are stronger are not as fast as Lebron and the players who are faster are not as strong as Lebron
Dude is a flawless athlete
Actual experts have Kobe ranked higher
What’s Bron’s case over MJ? To be the goat you have to be the best on the highest stage and that includes winning.
At what?
Still have to perform on the big stage and win. 6-0 is still 6-0 in the finals no matter what the spin is. Bron top 3 though
Bill Russell is pre-modern NBA era and Horry is a role player like Steve Kerr. MJ and Bron have all the individual accolades as well as team success to make a goat case.
want me to refute you?
ha*He traded in his finesse for muscles. Which makes his game very boring,uninspiring,predictable to watch. He wont age well enough to ever be goat,due to the weakness of his highlight reel. Highlight reels are what future generations look at to guage your greatness on the eye test,couples with the stats.
Stop lying...
At some point the longevity has to matter. You can make the case that Mike was greater peak-for-peak, but its inches not feet, and vice versa---->you can credibly make the case Bron had the higher peak, but it would be marginal...
For my money they have the two highest peaks ever...
How you perform in the postseasons is critical to me, and again for my money they are the two most consistent playoff performers ever. I can see an argument for Jordan that he doesn't have a choke or a low like '11 Finals, but there is no other argument in his favor. The Finals record is irrelevant, particularly given one guy spent a larger portion of his career playing in Finals than the other, meaning he had his team in championship contention more often; and the fact one guy played in a more competitive era than the other, with tougher opponents...
This isn't a demerit against Jordan. It just means having this understanding doesn't warrant giving Mike some extra brownie points when you know the two above points to be true...
So if I say the two peaked equally high, and are playoff equals aside from Bron's Finals choke, that leaves who sustained their peak play and their prime play for longer. It's Bron easily, the weight of that isn't all that strong given how strong Mike's resume is but it isnt irrelevant...
To me they are interchangeable and I only trip on heads who say it's Mike "undebatably", or use the ring argument as you did. Those aren't legitimate arguments in Mike's favor. He obviously has a case as greatest player ever.....but it's certainly debatable. And Bron is right at the top with him...
I prefer Bron, for me personally Bron doing his work in a tougher era tips the scales, same way you alluded to Mike doing his work in his era rather than Russell in his favors Mike for you. I think Bron is better, let's not pretend he has no case over Mike----durability, longevity, equal peak, better and more versatile peak defender---but it's marginal and I'm cool if someone likes Mike more...
Actual experts have Kobe ranked higher
This is a stat geeks argument.
Im dying here. Im like “where?”At which point did I discuss stats?
At which point did I discuss stats?
I get it Bron is your goat and that’s perfectly fine. How can Bron who attached his legacy to the real goat MJ be considered the goat. Peak dominance over competition is what determines the goat. MJ is “un debatably” the goat.Stop lying...
At some point the longevity has to matter. You can make the case that Mike was greater peak-for-peak, but its inches not feet, and vice versa---->you can credibly make the case Bron had the higher peak, but it would be marginal...
For my money they have the two highest peaks ever...
How you perform in the postseasons is critical to me, and again for my money they are the two most consistent playoff performers ever. I can see an argument for Jordan that he doesn't have a choke or a low like '11 Finals, but there is no other argument in his favor. The Finals record is irrelevant, particularly given one guy spent a larger portion of his career playing in Finals than the other, meaning he had his team in championship contention more often; and the fact one guy played in a more competitive era than the other, with tougher opponents...
This isn't a demerit against Jordan. It just means having this understanding doesn't warrant giving Mike some extra brownie points when you know the two above points to be true...
So if I say the two peaked equally high, and are playoff equals aside from Bron's Finals choke, that leaves who sustained their peak play and their prime play for longer. It's Bron easily, the weight of that isn't all that strong given how strong Mike's resume is but it isnt irrelevant...
To me they are interchangeable and I only trip on heads who say it's Mike "undebatably", or use the ring argument as you did. Those aren't legitimate arguments in Mike's favor. He obviously has a case as greatest player ever.....but it's certainly debatable. And Bron is right at the top with him...
I prefer Bron, for me personally Bron doing his work in a tougher era tips the scales, same way you alluded to Mike doing his work in his era rather than Russell in his favors Mike for you. I think Bron is better, let's not pretend he has no case over Mike----durability, longevity, equal peak, better and more versatile peak defender---but it's marginal and I'm cool if someone likes Mike more...