you say that as if there is a scientific definition of "black". There is none. It's all interpretation and it's plainly obvious you have a very cacass interpretation of the world.All haplogroups are variations of other haplogroups, but this does not imply that all human beings are black.
This is actually not true. Blacks do not have all haplogroups. Blacks, for example, do not have Asian haplogroups. Our primary haplogroups are A, B, L and e1b1b. Asians have haplogroups like O3, C, etc.
This statement is a misnomer. Africa is only the most genetically diverse group of people on the planet if you include other races whom exist in Africa like North Africans and to a certain extent the most Eastern Africans. The black Africans in Africa are not genetically diverse. There is not even a true genetic difference between neighbouring countries in West Africa, nevermind the differing tribes within that region's respective countries.
There are whites whom have the same thing. This does not imply the same genes, only similar features.
There are indeed blacks with straighter noses, but that is just natural variation. It does not mean imply blacks are Indians or vice versa. Similarly there are whites with flatter noses, that does not imply blacks are whites.
And whites are descended from a newer group whom left Africa. Wouldn't that mean whites are closer to blacks? Listen, Indians are cool people and I have nothing in particular against them, but I do not see the truth or utility in calling them black. I have enough experience with them to know.
Prove me wrong, @Poitier
Prove it.
you say that as if there is a scientific definition of "black". There is none. It's all interpretation and it's plainly obvious you have a very cacass interpretation of the world.
That's fine, I'll continue to ignore that white supremacist ideology.
@ Cacs being more closely related to blacks.
Historically they are the cac's snitches and servants. Trust
nope wrong. There is interpretation of scientific evidence that "defines" "black", but nothing purely scientific at all. And by that same interpretation some dark skin nappy headed people in certain parts of the globe aren't even considered black.There is indeed a scientific definition to being of Sub Saharan African descent, colloquially known as black. I don't have a cac view of the world. I just know better than this whole "we are all black" nonsense". everybody wanna be black but nobody wanna be black.
And Indians don't wanna be black when they are around blacks. When the cac master ruled, the Indians chose their side. Trust
you sure about that.
Mindy Kaling's brother is proof enough. There's more out there but you get the drift. Imagine millions of these black-hating people, and you understand why I say what I say.
I believe a lot of the Punjabis are Jake
I believe a lot of the Punjabis are Jake
yet i bet they still feel like they are better than black folks though..
i used to know an indian darker than me , yet had the most disdain for black folks..
like nikka you think if the kkk was out here you would be skating out this bytch??