You cant claim to be pro black/pro black family if you don't want kids or marriage.

[1stPick]

You can disagree all you like, but poor blacks having kids is as much pro-black as it was pro-white for poor whites (who in fact were poorer than black Americans are today). And if breeding is pro-black, then it's pro-black. End of story. Some of the advantages of a large population are as follows:

1) More political strength. A high population means more potential soldiers and a more powerful military. Politicians can use this fact to project power and negotiate disputes.

2) A stronger and better economy. A high population creates a larger market of goods and services, which increases the size of an economy. India and China have two of the largest economies in the world namely because of how large their populations are.

3) More gifted people. Even though India's average IQ is lower than America's, there are far more geniuses born everyday to Indians than Americas as a function of how large the Indian population is. India's entire political elite could be filled with geniuses just based on how many there are. America has no such advantage.

4) More development. The number of businessmen, doctors, scientists, etc which live in a country like India could fill cities several times over. This can create smart zones like Black Wall Street and speed up development/trade/everything.

1. Stop comparing us to CACS or other ethnic groups. It's much easier for a poor white person to find success in a nation where whites have the power or a poor indian/chinese person to find success in a nation where their ethnic group has the power than it is for a poor black person in a nation where someone else has the power. It's not the same dynamic. If we were talking about Africa, the tone of this post might be a bit different

2. I never said "poor" blacks shouldnt have kids. I said DESTRUCTIVE blacks shouldnt have kids. I'm all for poor people of good character having babies. Richard Sherman went from Compton to Stanford, despite growing up poor, because he had two parents of good character. I have no issue with that.

 

[Blackking]

But u tell all ur hood friends they need to have $xx,xxx in the bank before they can have kids

I make suggestions and hints... but not because of income...
Because of mentality. If I know ur a scam artists and thug... chances r in 15 years ur son might rob my ass and its ur fault .

 

[Blackking]

if you can't support a child you shouldn't bring a child into this world, parenting skills can't quench a child's thirst or fill their empty stomachs. and where does a person with no kids get "parenting skills"?

Clearly,

People on this board haven't been poor poor before...

A good parent can feed u , ur siblings and random cousins with less to nothing and produce college graduates and college athletes off of nothing.

If u don't have the income.... then u need the skills.


Many of our. Best come from poverty .

And fyi, parenting skills are a reflection of life skills , ur mistakes and ur experience

 

[Matt504]

I don't see the point of your post. Cacs achieve their domination through introducing poor masses and inspiring them to breed every single time. This is how cacs take over continents and destroy peoples.



And there are about a billion cacs on Earth, give or take. America and Europe combined is about 1 billion. If that's a minority, then the Arabs are more of a minority since there are only 500 million of them, and only a billion blacks, another "minority". Lol, you don't know what you're talking about.



There's nothing detrimental about having more black people. More cac people = the control of the world. Telling black people to have fewer kids and fewer blacks is exactly what white supremacists want and exactly what people like Margaret Sanger tried to do. If we want more black geniuses, we need more black kids. We will get more good black people at the very top through more black people in general. This is common sense.

cacs achieve their domination through careful planning, not reckless breeding, cacs didn't show up to america and overwhelm the natives with europeans, they befriended them, learned the customs, languages, skills, traditions, and THEN began to eliminate them systematically, laying the groundwork to import poor masses.

there are roughly 9 non-whites on planet earth to every 1 white person, therefore whites are a minority on planet earth.

I'm not suggesting that Black people have fewer kids, but I am suggesting that they only have kids they can afford to take care of, otherwise they'll have to rely on cacs to help them feed and sometimes shelter their children via government entitlement programs.

 

[godkiller]

1. Stop comparing us to CACS or other ethnic groups. It's much easier for a poor white person to find success in a nation where whites have the power or a poor indian/chinese person to find success in a nation where their ethnic group has the power than it is for a poor black person in a nation where someone else has the power. It's not the same dynamic. If we were talking about Africa, the tone of this post might be a bit different

Why not compare blacks to cacs? The comparison is not invalid merely because you are a cac who does not like the notion that more blacks equals more economic potential, more political potential, more military potential and more development. If more [insert people] works for every other group, there's no reckoning things are any different for blacks. In fact I know things are no different for blacks. Blacks only have power in countries where the majority of the population are black, same as whites and Chinese. So why the fukk would anyone ask blacks NOT to breed? That means FEWER BLACKS AND LESS POWER, not MORE, by your own admission.

2. I never said "poor" blacks shouldnt have kids. I said DESTRUCTIVE blacks shouldnt have kids. I'm all for poor people of good character having babies. Richard Sherman went from Compton to Stanford, despite growing up poor, because he had two parents of good character. I have no issue with that.

There are benefits and compromises to everything. If more blacks are born, there will be more criminals and more law abiding people. But also more generals, doctors, lawyers, etc. Right now the majority of people cac cops kill are actually cacs, but then the majority of leaders are also cacs. Inasmuch as the cac is willing to birth some paupers in order to birth some kings, I am too. This is just the nature of humanity.

 

[Matt504]

Clearly,

People on this board haven't been poor poor before...

A good parent can feed u , ur siblings and random cousins with less to nothing and produce college graduates and college athletes off of nothing.

If u don't have the income.... then u need the skills.


Many of our. Best come from poverty .

And fyi, parenting skills are a reflection of life skills , ur mistakes and ur experience

with all the mistakes Black people have made in just the last 50 years alone, we should be producing the best parents on earth, but the innercities, filled with expert mistake makers, are still turning out kids who rely on government entitlement programs, government education and government housing.

nutrition is extremely important in a child's development, and making food stretch to feed 4-5 children hurts children more than it helps.

 

[mcdivit85]

Living a pro black life. Supporting black communities in some way shape or form. You don't have to be black to do that.

So blackness isn't even necessary to be pro-black?

Does that mean that most blacks are pro-white since they support white communities everyday?

Peace

 

[Matt504]

So blackness isn't even necessary to be pro-black?

Does that mean that most blacks are pro-white since they support white communities everyday?

Peace

that's exactly what it means, and it's true, whether people want to acknowledge it or not is another story.

 

[godkiller]

cacs achieve their domination through careful planning, not reckless breeding, cacs didn't show up to america and overwhelm the natives with europeans, they befriended them, learned the customs, languages, skills, traditions, and THEN began to eliminate them systematically, laying the groundwork to import poor masses.

They specifically achieve domination through a combination of war planning and reckless breeding, obviously. But reckless breeding comes first, during and last. After all cacs wouldn't have any explorers and soldiers at first--and then the legions of forces and people to carry out their ends--if not for the reckless breeding. In fact, without the reckless breeding, there is no systematic annihilation and no colonization. War requires warriors, generals, laborers, etc. It is no coincidence that cacs are have reckless breeding in every place they now rule, including the Americas, Australia and Canada. Planning is not implementation; implementation is implementation. And implementation in the form of war, economy, and population is what enabled white power in the Americas (and still does lest you think the fact cacs numbering damn near 300 million in the Americas is some kind of accident).

there are roughly 9 non-whites on planet earth to every 1 white person, therefore whites are a minority on planet earth.

You don't know what you're talking about. We are all minorities to Asian people.

I'm not suggesting that Black people have fewer kids,

What? Yes you are.

but I am suggesting that they only have kids they can afford to take care of, otherwise they'll have to rely on cacs to help them feed and sometimes shelter their children via government entitlement programs.

And I have already explained to you that this ideal is anti-black. Cacs, Arabs, etc conquerors all had children they could not afford to feed. But if half of 10 children died, another 5 lived, and those 5 would fight for the empire. And if 10 million were born and 2 million died, that would leave 8 million to kill off the 1 million black fools whom chose to voluntarily sterilize themselves on account of cac propaganda bout bullshyt.

 

[AITheAnswerAI]

Why do we always have to come up with rules like this? Steve Harvey saw nikkas like coming up with random rules and profited off that shyt with his book

 

[1stPick]

cacs achieve their domination through careful planning, not reckless breeding, cacs didn't show up to america and overwhelm the natives with europeans, they befriended them, learned the customs, languages, skills, traditions, and THEN began to eliminate them systematically, laying the groundwork to import poor masses.

there are roughly 9 non-whites on planet earth to every 1 white person, therefore whites are a minority on planet earth.

I'm not suggesting that Black people have fewer kids, but I am suggesting that they only have kids they can afford to take care of, otherwise they'll have to rely on cacs to help them feed and sometimes shelter their children via government entitlement programs.

This, have 0 clue why this is such a difficult thing to grasp

 

[godkiller]

This, have 0 clue why this is such a difficult thing to grasp

I replied to his post and explained why his assertion is wrong. Reckless breeding is what enables war and conquest. This is why cacs always do reckless breeding whenever they want to steal a continent. But I suppose you think we should defer to your assurances otherwise even whilst they conflict with logic and history. After all, There is no continent that cacs control where they did not do reckless breeding. Even without a formal explanation (which I have kindly given), the relationship between reckless breeding and warmongering in this context implies that reckless breeding is integral. The fact cacs KILL other groups and REDUCE THEIR NUMBERS to ENABLE CAC CONTROL implies that RECKLESS BREEDING, which is ANOTHER TERM FOR INCREASING POPULATION NUMBERS, IS INTEGRAL TO CONTROL OF A CONTINENT. In other words, cacs fight to REDUCE AND ELIMINATE the "reckless breeding" of other groups as a way to ESTABLISH CONTROL.

 

[mcdivit85]

that's exactly what it means, and it's true, whether people want to acknowledge it or not is another story.

#whitepower

 

[godkiller]

When an opposing force poisons an enemy's water supply or attacks said enemy's supplies, they do so to weaken the enemy by reducing his numbers (i.e. soldiers will die from poison; others from starvation). This is a form of ancient population control armies would use to increas their chances of winning. Railing against black people having kids is another form of population control and is liable to achieve the similar ends.

 

[Blackking]

with all the mistakes Black people have made in just the last 50 years alone, we should be producing the best parents on earth, but the innercities, filled with expert mistake makers, are still turning out kids who rely on government entitlement programs, government education and government housing.

nutrition is extremely important in a child's development, and making food stretch to feed 4-5 children hurts children more than it helps.

Good thing most people on stamps have enough food, and don't have five kids


Im a conservative, so I really don't encourage the usage of social gov programs.... but truth is...

Name ten pro blacks revolutionaries.... then name ten famous blacks.... then name ten blacks in sports.. then name ten rich blacks

Now look at the epidemic of suburban blacks w degrees out here struggling.

Sure, your parents can increase opportunities.. but lessons is what determines success and exposure is what determines mentality.


Ntm, ur generalizing blacks.... 70% of us produce kids not on entitlement programs.

Maybe the problem is we're too busy allowing mainstream society tell us who we are then regurgitating the stigma