fukk wrong with y'allshyt looks piff.
Better than those Andrew Garfield movies for sure![]()
Agree with the bolded
fukk wrong with y'allshyt looks piff.
Better than those Andrew Garfield movies for sure![]()
Sony only has the rights, marvel is in control of how the movie is madeThis doesn't refute what I said about Sony still having some control and how they've been fukking up Spider-Man :diesel:
Shes mixed so technically on the Coli, she's not black...So y'all ain't peep the agenda @:30?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
2000s spiderman>>>>>
I don't be understanding why we need 6 different spiderman movies that doesn't even relate to one another.![]()
That's how comic books are for the most part. The current Spider Man is some black teenage dude. That's why I think the format is better suited for TV but i digress2000s spiderman>>>>>
I don't be understanding why we need 6 different spiderman movies that doesn't even relate to one another.![]()
I would be surprised if they mixed a practical effects in a shot like that but I guess it's possible.Its probably due to the type of film they used + optimizing for HD, because I don't think this is CG at all. If anything just the background is CG, overlaying a simple greenscreen. But the guy and the suit is real. At least that's how it looks to me