AquaCityBoy
Veteran
fukk wrong with y'all 
shyt looks piff.
Better than those Andrew Garfield movies for sure
shyt looks piff.Better than those Andrew Garfield movies for sure
Yo This New Spiderman looks off da chain
- Thread starter Doobie Doo
- Start date
Ricky Dunigan
Superstar
I fukks with it 
Marissa Tomei for her age
Is Michael Keaton Vulture?
I wish they'd stop giving away so much of the plot in these previews tho
Marissa Tomei for her age
Is Michael Keaton Vulture?
I wish they'd stop giving away so much of the plot in these previews tho
That was true originally they finally struck a deal with marvel in 15 lol.
The Good and The Bad of Marvel and Sony's Spider-Man Deal - SuperHeroHype
Doobie Doo
Veteran
fukk wrong with y'all
Better than those Andrew Garfield movies for sure
The George Lazenby of Spidermans
This doesn't refute what I said about Sony still having some control and how they've been fukking up Spider-Man :diesel:
CG looks way better now. But the 2000 Spiderman is criminally underrated these days especially in terms of production. Still not sure if anybody has topped Willem Dafoe for best Marvel villain yet. It used top CG effects at the time, which wasn't that long ago, but they probably used way more practical effects. In fact I'm sure they did.
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2015
- Messages
- 24,998
- Reputation
- 14,858
- Daps
- 106,244
- Reppin
- Charlotte - Washington D.C.
You where saying they where cranking them out just to retain the rights that changed with this deal. Also from my understanding Sony is basically just collecting a check.
ill_will82
What you see, is what you get
marvel doesn't have full control though . . .I wish they'd give marvel back each of the properties(x-men has been handled so-so) eventually this will all lead to some dc vs marvel type movie but with properties so spilt ehh
lmao any talk on whats going to happen with fantastic four
That will never happen and I REPEAT NEVER happen. It would be a hell of thing to see a Marvel vs DC movie happen in my lifetime but it's just too many rights, studios, & money involved.
Last edited:
Ironman
#Knickstape
I hate ironman
Agreed but money . . the money involved usually it can make these greedy studios work something out, but as you've said the split of properties and all the different companies makes it damn near impossible. As I look into it though all of dc is under warner brothers, it's just marvel who has their properties split across the realm.
people would pay crazy amounts to see hulk and super man fight
ShadowBroker
Born of the Night
I'll watch. I'd really like to see him fight the Sinister Six tho. Or if they could get their own movie that would be even better.
ill_will82
What you see, is what you get
Agreed but money . . the money involved usually it can make these greedy studios work something out, but as you've said the split of properties and all the different companies makes it damn near impossible. As I look into it though all of dc is under warner brothers, it's just marvel who has their properties split across the realm.
people would pay crazy amounts to see hulk and super man fight
Yeah people would pay to see Superman vs Hulk on the big screen but the main reason I don't think a Marvel vs DC movie would work is partially because of WB. They are struggling right now to push out their movies and then you got a bunch of rumors of fukkery behind those WB/DC movies as well. Marvel has a 7-8 yr head start over DC is because everything else outside of Batman & Superman movies were tied up legal.
Ironman
#Knickstape
I didn't cause that shipwreck
