Ya'll ready for the white nationalist revolution currently bubbling beneath the surface?

killacal

killacal

Banned
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
30,869
Reputation
9,112
Daps
178,814
Rhakim said:
So ya'all think the military is going to be on their side too, or you think you've going to fight off the military with a couple of gats. :comeon:

And money? :dwillhuh:

Some of ya'all get so scary so easily. :snoop:
Click to expand...
Didn't age well:mjlol:
 
Professor Emeritus

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,666
Daps
203,891
Reppin
the ether
Adeptus Astartes

Adeptus Astartes

Loyal servant of the God-Brehmperor
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Messages
11,201
Reputation
2,708
Daps
68,366
Reppin
Imperium of Man
Rhakim said:
I heard the relative of one of the victims call this out directly on television today. They literally took his gun from him and he was still able to legally buy an even more deadly replacement.
Click to expand...
Indiana has red flag laws. This was a failure of law enforcement.
 
Adeptus Astartes

Adeptus Astartes

Loyal servant of the God-Brehmperor
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Messages
11,201
Reputation
2,708
Daps
68,366
Reppin
Imperium of Man
Rhakim said:
Indiana's red flag law has a massive loophole - even if LE takes the gun away, there is nothing preventing the person from buying another gun. And LE can't do anything about it.
Click to expand...
The ban lasts a year, and can be reupped if LE proves dude was still dangerous. LE dropped the ball. Didn't even do the bare minimum of a hearing.
 
Professor Emeritus

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,666
Daps
203,891
Reppin
the ether
Adeptus Astartes said:
The ban lasts a year, and can be reupped if LE proves dude was still dangerous. LE dropped the ball. Didn't even do the bare minimum of a hearing.
Click to expand...
According to one of Indiana's own DA's there is no ban while the case is pending, even if the firearm is confiscated:

Right now, even if officers temporarily take away someone’s gun, that person can still go to a gun store and purchase one while the case is open.

“We ultimately don’t benefit if those individuals have access to firearms if they are not of sound mind,” said Mears.

Mears believes family members are courageous when they ask police to take a gun away from a loved one. He thinks lawmakers need to show some courage too.

Indiana’s Red Flag Law — also known as the Jake Laird Law — allows officers to seize a person’s gun if law enforcement thinks he or she is dangerous or mentally unstable. A hearing is then set within 14 days.

However, Mears said often times the person whose firearm was taken wants to present evidence and testimony. So the case goes to trial. Mears explains that the process sometimes can take months, and in that time period, the person can legally purchase another gun.

“I think we need to have the courage to say it doesn’t make sense for this person to have the ability to purchase a firearm literally an hour later after they go through this stressful situation,” he said.

Mears is urging lawmakers to close this loophole.

He used a case last year as an example. Mears said a petition was filed in December of 2018 to take away a gun from a woman named Melissia Mitchell.

About two months later, in February of 2019, police said she shot her neighbor, Seth Johnson. He was taken to surgery for a bullet wound to his right lung, several broken ribs and a portion of his lung had to be removed, according to court documents. Mitchell was charged with aggravated battery and carrying a handgun without a license.

The Marion County Prosecutor’s Office said she purchased that firearm from a licensed gun dealer.

“There is nothing from preventing a person from purchasing, using or borrowing a firearm from someone else while their case is pending,” Mears said. “The law only applies to the dangerous firearm the person had access to when the officer interacted with them.”
Click to expand...


And yes, LE didn't do their job either but I don't expect them to. If they have to go through a lengthy trial process every time they want to temporarily ban someone from having a gun when that person can easily get a gun during the trial or a year after anyway, it's not surprising that they don't invest heavy resources into it.

The default should be in the other direction, as it would be with actual serious background checks and waiting periods before purchase. But we have too many nuts obsessed with arcane rules written when slavery was chill, women weren't full citizens, and black folk were only worth 3/5th.
 
GnauzBookOfRhymes

GnauzBookOfRhymes

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
12,489
Reputation
2,832
Daps
47,869
Reppin
NULL
88m3 said:
just sitting here like how much is a grift, how many of them want violence and are a threat, and hurry up and die boomers
Click to expand...

The key is that no matter which group they're in, the goal/belief system is the same.

It's not like other movements where for instance you have a ton of grifters who are making money but don't actually want or care for the movement to succeed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top