WW2 tidbits. France and UK could've crushed Nazi Germany but didn't

Robbie3000

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
29,820
Reputation
5,304
Daps
131,923
Reppin
NULL
We're lucky it played out that way. Stalin was going to do something much worse but he couldn't ever form trust with hitler. Imagine Russian numbers with German Tech. The world was dead if they cliqued up.

Thread title is weird because Hitler beat the brakes off France in like a day and had everyone in the UK running and hiding underground for weeks.

League of bytch ass Nations caused WW2 imo. Making Germany pay a huge bill after WW1 and telling Japan to shut up and be quiet after they helped during WW1. This is not how you make peace you greedy fukks.

In the end poor decision making and idk insanity i guess lost hitler the war, like why on Earth would Hitler not try to just appease the USA and just settle for Europe. Nazis had some sympathizers in the USA, they should have relaxed their rhetoric and went for peace using politics, geez you already had UK and Russia Shook, that was impressive enough, really fam, cliquing up with Japan and going to war with a fresh USA? WHY???? Insanity. The war was over the moment Japan didnt continue on to bombing the mainland after pearl harbour.

Russia and the East were always the targets. Hitler believed that for German to take its “rightful” place amongst the world’s”Great Nations” he needed to conquer territory in the East and wipe off half of the population of the Slavs who he saw as an inferior race of people. Plus he could destroy the communist Bolsheviks who were directly opposed to the ideology of fascism and whom he believed were being led by treacherous Jews.

The war was largely the result of of one man’s insecurity and low self esteem gaining power at worst possible time.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,280
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
they could have created a trade route like the Africans and Asians did with the Silk & Spice Roads but they’re naturally blood thirsty savages

Europeans had been trading with Mesopotamian/Asian/Egyptian civilizations as well as others along the 'Silk Road' for a thousand+ years.....​

1177_BC%2C_Cline_book.jpg
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
55,153
Reputation
2,816
Daps
156,233
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
One other tidbit. The Germany tried to form an alliance with Mexico but the British intercepted the telegram and that's what initially got the U.S. involved in WWI.

Germany promised that if they sided with them, and won, Mexico would get Texas, New Mexico and Arizona back.
 

tuckgod

The high exalted
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
48,329
Reputation
14,660
Daps
180,207
Which part?

The part that Austria would take an entire nation to war because one of their citizens killed the Archduke.

They couldn’t talk that out?

All the nations of the world couldn’t talk that out?
 

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,538
Reputation
3,352
Daps
54,272
Reppin
CALI
The part that Austria would take an entire nation to war because one of their citizens killed the Archduke.

They couldn’t talk that out?

All the nations of the world couldn’t talk that out?
It basically came down to territory disputes and colonization.

Austria tried to use the opportunity to get Serbia to give up a portion of their territory to avoid war. Allied countries felt like they were asking for too much. Everyone wanted to go to war for land.

Nobody talks about how the allies double crossed the ottoman empire and stole their land after getting them to go to war against Germany and Australia.

Ww1 is a good example of how the winners dictate how history gets told.
 

Sire366

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,148
Reputation
270
Daps
2,999
Reppin
Phila
It basically came down to territory disputes and colonization.

Austria tried to use the opportunity to get Serbia to give up a portion of their territory to avoid war. Allied countries felt like they were asking for too much. Everyone wanted to go to war for land.

Nobody talks about how the allies double crossed the ottoman empire and stole their land after getting them to go to war against Germany and Australia.

Ww1 is a good example of how the winners dictate how history gets told.
?????????????????

Ottoman Empire was with Germany, and Austria in the Central Powers (Im sure you meant Austria and not Australia)
Their first course of action in 1914 was attacking Russia, they were on the losing side
 

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,538
Reputation
3,352
Daps
54,272
Reppin
CALI
?????????????????

Ottoman Empire was with Germany, and Austria in the Central Powers (Im sure you meant Austria and not Australia)
Their first course of action in 1914 was attacking Russia, they were on the losing side
Yeah I have my details swapped. They aligned with the central powers not knowing that the central powers planned on dividing their land up after the war.
 

QuintessentialMan

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
4,418
Reputation
1,109
Daps
13,879
Russia and the East were always the targets. Hitler believed that for German to take its “rightful” place amongst the world’s”Great Nations” he needed to conquer territory in the East and wipe off half of the population of the Slavs who he saw as an inferior race of people. Plus he could destroy the communist Bolsheviks who were directly opposed to the ideology of fascism and whom he believed were being led by treacherous Jews.

The war was largely the result of of one man’s insecurity and low self esteem gaining power at worst possible time.


It has been suggested that dude was maybe trying to compensate for something.

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-02-22/adolf-hitler-had-a-small-penis-report-finds

The Science Behind Hitler's Possible Micropenis 

Adolf Hitler had 1 testicle and a really small penis, according to historians - National | Globalnews.ca
 

Able Archer 83

Two Minutes to Midnight
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Messages
947
Reputation
380
Daps
3,588
Reppin
316
There were other factors but that one was a big one. Germany didn't have to concede, they were fukking shyt up and only stopped because the loss of life was becoming too much for all sides. The German people felt like their leaders were weak for rolling over and accepting the terms of defeat. They they were blamed and forced to pay for a war they didn't cause and it had fukked up their economy, the germans were rightfully pissed.

Postwar German revisionism. The military was inflicting casualties, but was falling apart at the seams. Entire divisions were melting away, and there was a major mutiny in the German Navy. The German military leadership i.e. Hindenburg recognized this more than anyone, but were too cowardly to sign the armistice themselves in order to avoid the stain of defeat, leaving it to low-level officers--even though the high command bore the blame more than anyone else.

Also, every level of German society was collapsing, and the Bolshevik Revolution was spreading into Germany proper. Within three months of the Armistice, there would be open combat in the streets. This was going to happen whether or not Germany "rolled over"; the only difference is the Armistice ensured there were enough demobilized soldiers and equipment to engage in counterrevolutionary warfare.
 

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,538
Reputation
3,352
Daps
54,272
Reppin
CALI
Postwar German revisionism. The military was inflicting casualties, but was falling apart at the seams. Entire divisions were melting away, and there was a major mutiny in the German Navy. The German military leadership i.e. Hindenburg recognized this more than anyone, but were too cowardly to sign the armistice themselves in order to avoid the stain of defeat, leaving it to low-level officers--even though the high command bore the blame more than anyone else.

Also, every level of German society was collapsing, and the Bolshevik Revolution was spreading into Germany proper. Within three months of the Armistice, there would be open combat in the streets. This was going to happen whether or not Germany "rolled over"; the only difference is the Armistice ensured there were enough demobilized soldiers and equipment to engage in counterrevolutionary warfare.
When I say "rolled over" I dont mean give up the war. I mean they should never have allowed the blame and consequences to be place solely at their feet. They should have held off for better terms that wouldn't leave them fukked after the war.
 

Dorian Breh

Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
22,060
Reputation
13,465
Daps
111,060
:dahell: what’s wrong with that thread

If he would have remained allies with Russia they very likely would have won the war

The Russians saved the entire European continent from becoming German

Germany didn't have enough fuel to run their subs, tanks and planes without invading Russia

Stalin wasn't gonna give them that shyt

They weren't allies, it was a non aggression pact
 
Top