The_King_of_Everything
Yeah.
[/quote]A source who's ideas or theories have scientific research to back them.
So just because I haven't conducted an experiment it makes my theory a conspiracy or irrelevant?
The news brings on a man who use to be a pilot 30 years ago and asked him what he thinks happened to the plane and he says: "it probably blew up" and that's ok but I can't have a theory?
no.
If it's not then what is it
no, it's asking you to provide support from reputable sources. As it turns out people who quote reputable sources I guess do suffer from "group think" the same way you and I suffer from "group think" when we agree 1+1=2.
Define a reputable source when half of these sources have on multiple occasions received their information from places like twitter. I.e. Chris Dorner case, dark knight shooting.
What makes one person source any better then another?
got a link from a reputable source or is this just conjecture and your own opinion.
Majority of American culture revolves around group think.
Do I lie?
Cut the BS the news don't know anything more then we do and we have a right to guess just like their doing without being labeled as conspiracy theorist.