World's oldest rock found in W. Australia; 4.374 billion years
- Thread starter Julius Skrrvin
- Start date
Read this again:
Why do you need to VERBALLY talk to a god, if god should know everything?
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Because thats how we communicate.
No, no it cant be proven. Its never been observed. There is no proof, im sorry.Its a wish. A dream from the mind of a racist unfortunately.
Evolution has been proven and observed in all species.
you are aware evolution doesn't work like pokemon right?No, no it cant be proven. Its never been observed. There is no proof, im sorry.
ill
Superstar
Mowgli is a master troll. I will concede that.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
No, it hasnt. When have we seen a lizard turn into a bird. Thats the most crucial aspect of evolution because it says that one species can transform into another. Yet, no transitional form exists, currently. There should be millions of species on their way into various transitions. Im sorry but you have faith that this is true.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
If my son has a bigger nose and you want to call that evolution ok, but dont tell me my son can turn into a whale if he stays by the ocean for a few million years. Its just not proveable
Julius Skrrvin
I be winkin' through the scope
at yall arguing this point with mowgli when people have put speciation evidence in front of him year after year after year
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Speculative theories friend. Speculative is the word you should be using. Things that cant be proven in a court of law. If the bones dont fit, you must aqquit.
I'm just going to spew my friends arguments, and you guys can tear them down accordingly:
1. All Scientific "facts" are followed by the small print "as far as we know" which makes them "soft facts" if anything. Certainly not anything we should accept as concrete.
2. The scientific method is just as closed minded. Everything is perceived and filtered through the scientific method, and any divine intervention is no exception. With this mindset outside possibilities are impossible as everything must have a scientific explanation, and those that dont, are pending one. A scientist will never look at "magic" and go holy shyt, that's magic. He is completely close minded to the idea.
3. The Resurrection is real, and has never been dis-proven, and the majority of those who have tried to disprove it, have become believers...
4. Genesis gives no time table. You are arguing with man, not God on this.
We debated this for like 30-50m, when it hit me that I cant win cause he believes in magic... no way you can win an argument vs magic
1. All Scientific "facts" are followed by the small print "as far as we know" which makes them "soft facts" if anything. Certainly not anything we should accept as concrete.
2. The scientific method is just as closed minded. Everything is perceived and filtered through the scientific method, and any divine intervention is no exception. With this mindset outside possibilities are impossible as everything must have a scientific explanation, and those that dont, are pending one. A scientist will never look at "magic" and go holy shyt, that's magic. He is completely close minded to the idea.
3. The Resurrection is real, and has never been dis-proven, and the majority of those who have tried to disprove it, have become believers...
4. Genesis gives no time table. You are arguing with man, not God on this.
We debated this for like 30-50m, when it hit me that I cant win cause he believes in magic... no way you can win an argument vs magic
you dont understand the thing you are trying to debate
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Dont try to tell me millions of years ago some atoms in a start decided to come together in an ocean and from a living breathing body to express themselves. Its obvious a creator did that since you know, all things in existence come from a creator you dig, like shovels?
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
No i dont think you do which is why you're running around in circles like relay races.