World's 100 richest men have ability to end global poverty FOUR times over

Julius Skrrvin

I be winkin' through the scope
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
16,319
Reputation
3,285
Daps
30,742
Oxfam says world's rich could end poverty - Europe - Al Jazeera English

The world's 100 richest people earned enough money last year to end world extreme poverty four times over, according to a new report released by international rights group and charity Oxfam.

The $240 billion net income of the world's 100 richest billionaires would have ended poverty four times over, according to the London-based group's report released on Saturday.:clint:

The group has called on world leaders to commit to reducing inequality to the levels it was at in 1990, and to curb income extremes on both sides of the spectrum.

The release of the report was timed to coincide with the holding of the World Economic Forum in Davos next week.

The group says that the world's richest one percent have seen their income increase by 60 percent in the last 20 years, with the latest world financial crisis only serving to hasten, rather than hinder, the process.:flabbynsick:

"We sometimes talk about the 'have-nots' and the 'haves' - well, we're talking about the 'have-lots'. [...] We're anti-poverty agency. We focus on poverty, we work with the poorest people around the world. You don't normally hear us talking about wealth. But it's gotten so out of control between rich and poor that one of the obstacles to solving extreme poverty is now extreme wealth," Ben Phillips, a campaign director at Oxfam, told Al Jazeera.

'Global new deal'

"We can no longer pretend that the creation of wealth for a few will inevitably benefit the many – too often the reverse is true," said Jeremy Hobbs, an executive director at Oxfam.:krs:


"Concentration of resources in the hands of the top one per cent depresses economic activity and makes life harder for everyone else – particularly those at the bottom of the economic ladder.

"In a world where even basic resources such as land and water are increasingly scarce, we cannot afford to concentrate assets in the hands of a few and leave the many to struggle over what’s left.":bueno:

Hobbs said that "a global new deal" is required, encompassing a wide array of issues, from tax havens to employment laws, in order to address income inequality.

Closing tax havens, the group said, could yield an additional $189bn in additional tax revenues. According to Oxfam's figures, as much as $32 trillion is currently stored in tax havens.:ohhh:

In a statement, Oxfam warned that "extreme wealth and income is not only unethical it is also economically inefficient, politically corrosive, socially divisive and environmentally destructive."
 

bsmooth

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,980
Reputation
560
Daps
6,488
Reppin
NULL
Why go after single men who have accrued their own wealth? Go after corporations like Monsanto selling third world farmers self-destructing seeds and Nestle who see's the right to water as an extreme idea and feels it should be a commodity.

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyAzxmN2s0w"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyAzxmN2s0w[/ame]
 

Bud Bundy

A Bundy never cares
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,984
Reputation
1,620
Daps
22,446
then they would not be rich. To be rich with money in this world is just and extension of subjugating a person. And humans do not care for each other that much yet.
 

Starman

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
15,601
Reputation
-2,945
Daps
34,025
then they would not be rich. To be rich with money in this world is just and extension of subjugating a person. And humans do not care for each other that much yet.

:snoop:

Some teacher somewhere is a failure. Being rich does not equal subjugation.
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,385
Daps
32,641
Reppin
humans
There ain't no WAY $240 Billion will solve global poverty as the article claims.

I wouldn't be surprised if the US and Canada together haven't surpassed this total in donations to combat poverty in the last decade or so.

Anyone have official numbers?
 

Swirv

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Messages
17,011
Reputation
2,856
Daps
53,615
Why go after single men who have accrued their own wealth? Go after corporations like Monsanto selling third world farmers self-destructing seeds and Nestle who see's the right to water as an extreme idea and feels it should be a commodity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyAzxmN2s0w

Hes full of shyt. Didnt even explain why he believes water should be privatised or could b the translation that left something out.
 

Slystallion

Live to Strive
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
13,106
Reputation
-10,422
Daps
17,418
I dont think 240 billion would do it and it would be a temporary fix. As most would go back to their prior way of life once the money runs out since its unlikely they have the skills to sustain their newly acquired wealth.
 
Top