AyBrehHam Linkin
First Black Brehsident
Cacs will take tf outta yo money but let them owe you some money
The only people enraged by her story are financially illiterate or are on some cac sovereign bullshyt.
Everybody else sees a fool with no concept of delayed gratification willingly parting herself from the equivalent of lottery money, not earned money. Some wolf will be happy to help her lose the rest of it on a bogus frivolous lawsuit against the bank, though.
What confounds me is that you guys are posting like this is a proper and righteous approach...... If I earned/received the money legally..... you have no obligation to pressure or arbitrarily judge/prosecute me....
Riddle me this..... what major terrorist organizations, or wide scale fraudulent these schemes these types of procedures have thwarted or exposed...
Seems to me that this shyt is designed to antagonize and complicate the life of the average blue collar citizen as opposed to all that legislation that was written for the theoretical target.....
Her rent is due, she can't feed her babies and her insurance didn't take care of a totalled car for her --in spite of taking out thousands before the car was totalled.
That's how it's easy to infer she had nothing before the settlement, and is going to have nothing afterwards.
Bank of Illegals is on something; that jumped out at me, too.I work at a bank. Everytime you withdraw or deposit 3000$ or more in cash all of your information and information about that transaction has to be posted for the bank and government to track. I'm amazed it was only a 2 hour hold on the initial 50k in funds. This really isn't outrageous behavior from the bank. You know how many people try to scam banks and members of those banks?
Her funds were refrozen because she refused to comply with basic banking rules and regulations.They froze her whole account genius. That was probably the only bank account she had. Meaning, even her job money was frozen. Of course she has nothing in that case, but it doesn't mean she had nothing before that happened.
How was she going to know they were going to re-freeze her funds after already looking over it? When she took the money out it could have been the beginning of the month and she was content with her bills. Her car accident happened later on as well. She isn't psychic. Why take money out to buy a car when she had one already (pre-accident)? If anything, that would seem more reckless than what you're insinuating.
thats not the issue here. you cant make 2 separate transactions at different banks totaling more than 10k the same day. thats the law, and will get your shyt flagged pretty much instantly. its called circumventing/structuring to get around a federal law. its not 1995 when that kind of stuff flew under the radar. the shyts flagged right away now. she didnt know the law, and is paying the price for being an ignorant of the rules. she structured large withdrawls, after having a sudden windfall of cash roll in. thats literally what the law is in place to look out for. money laundering 101I would feel pissed If I got 50K and brought a new car but the bank put a freeze on my account because it looked suspicious... they dont do that to the wall street bankers and shyt. cause they got racks coming in and out every fukking day....
This is the correct answer.
I guess it's a testament to how few people in this thread deal with large sums of money to see how many are raging instead of shrugging at how many different red flags are in this story.
Bank of America ain't shyt, but they did nothing wrong in this story.
This bytch actually thought going to a different branch of the same bank would be different. WTF?
That's on top of the waste of settlement money in evidence. That includes everything wrong in how she was replacing a totalled car. Financial illiteracy so scary.
thats not the issue here. you cant make 2 separate transactions at different banks totaling more than 10k the same day. thats the law, and will get your shyt flagged pretty much instantly. its called circumventing/structuring to get around a federal law. its not 1995 when that kind of stuff flew under the radar. the shyts flagged right away now. she didnt know the law, and is paying the price for being an ignorant of the rules. she structured large withdrawls, after having a sudden windfall of cash roll in. thats literally what the law is in place to look out for. money laundering 101
i dont know about banking rules, but in the gambling world we arent allowed to inform anyone of the CTR-laws when asked about them. id imagine its the same in the banking world. they just pass the info on to the feds and wipe their hands of itI get that... But why didnt they explain THAT to her at the bank when the manager saw her???
Yes, it is her business.Given that she didn't do ANYTHING criminal to our knowledge, why WOULDN'T I speak out?
If she wants to spend every last cent she has on frivolous things, that's her business. It's stupid, but it's not criminal.
holds is a very normal practice, between 2-7 days is normal shyt. Once you establish a pattern of large deposits and have enough money in your account to cover checks they won't put holds on your shytBank of Illegals is on something; that jumped out at me, too.
The first time I made a $10k deposit at a different bank for a business account, I had two holds: I could only withdraw a certain amount from the deposit immediately, and then I wasn't given access to the rest for a week.