Absolutely, but you don't want to totally throw those individuals in the bushes either.
With "The Cloud" on the horizon will the PS4 stifle innovation?
- Thread starter MeachTheMonster
- Start date
Absolutely, but you don't want to totally throw those individuals in the bushes either.
but I canYou clearly can't read
Such insightful commentary
sony is winning they don't have to do shyt and probably won't
lets be honest here this is a troll attempt at trying to say xbox is a better console because of azure and saying sony is holding it back
kinda like some multplats on ps4 being 900p because of the x1
Sports games being peer to peer is trash. As a fan you should advocate innovation not penny pinching.
And even though they are peer to peer they still need to pay for servers. If Microsoft is basically giving servers away, it would be much of a financial hit to do it. Its just a case of fans still buying the shyt every year regardless of what they put into it
They don't want to stop using their own servers because they've already invested a bunch of money in them. But again its up to gamers to demand innovation. Even though 2k and Battlfield servers have been absolutely shyt for almosta decade, people still to buy the games day oneGames like BF and other shooters is definitely where it gets interesting and would absolutely benefit. However, control of their own servers may not be something that EA and its devs would be willing to give up (even though they should in the case of BF, these out of region mufukkaz are ruining the game and Dice has said that they need more servers to combat the issue to "fix" it).
Just answering the question raised in the thread title
A bit of an explanation would have been nice. After all this is a discussion forum.
Absolut da poet ®
Jubilado
All you see is Stan shyt breh.
Pitiful existence
at least I can recognize it, I don't think you can
Doesn't look like its gonna work with Xbox though.
True, but I believe you come to a point where you have to weigh the potential profit vs known profit. Yes they used levolution as a marketing strategy, but at the same time it cost them nothing extra as they've done it before ( I believe) and its in house.
I see it as (X amount of copies of battlefield would be sold if they used cloud physics, based on surveys, pre orders, projections etc) - (any extra out of pocket labor/fees they have to pay) vs ( just taking what they have now and slapping new paint on it).
IF msft is really giving away cloud space to companies in encouragement for this type of development AND the implementation (labor and cost wise) is minuscule, then I see it taking off. But, with as much as these companies scream about exorbitant budgets and rising development times, I think it will be a while before we see 3rd parties adopting the cloud.
Sports games being peer to peer is trash. As a fan you should advocate innovation not penny pinching.
And even though they are peer to peer they still need to pay for servers. If Microsoft is basically giving servers away, it would be much of a financial hit to do it. Its just a case of fans still buying the shyt every year regardless of what they put into it
They don't want to stop using their own servers because they've already invested a bunch of money in them. But again its up to gamers to demand innovation. Even though 2k and Battlfield servers have been absolutely shyt for almosta decade, people still to buy the games day one
No one is going to use a cloud or dedicated server platform for sports games where it's one user vs another. That is not happening. The amount of resources you'd need to essentially have a room/server dedicated for each team vs each team in various regions worldwide for each sports gameswith specific criteria is not happening. The costs would be absurd for just these matchmaking servers.
2K's issue is their online setup period. Their network engineers are trash.
That's why I specifically mentioned FPS's since that makes total sense.
remember when "the cloud" was supposed to make graphics on the xbox one better
No. That claim was never made
fukk outta here u and yo boy court slum were trumpeting that shyt like crazy and no I'm not going to go dig that shyt up right now
No.
fukk outta here u and yo boy court slum were trumpeting that shyt like crazy and no I'm not going to go dig that shyt up right now
You won't dig it up cause it doesn't exist
People claimed using the Internet itself for gaming would NEVER happen for the same reasons you guys are proposing here.
Its always a balance of cost vs innovation. All its gonna take is a game to come out and take the world by storm, then everybody is gonna want to have cloud tech in their games,