Deni proving why he would've been better for this team.
Warriors could've traded down, added more depth, AND got Deni. He's playing like a vet out there.
This would have been a SMARTER move.
Wiseman is gonna be a problem
- Thread starter Inferno
- Start date
This would have been a SMARTER move.
Bigblackted4
Superstar
Noticed this, he disappears a lot in games and the talent flashes but he isn’t even as good as Ayton wasA lot of dudes are fooled by a couple of athletic plays by him; it's clear as day they're not actually watching the games. He's been poor, overall, which needless to say, is expected given his inexperience, but there's already a lot of red flags with his play, that's going to take years for him to work through.
Warriors would be better off trading him and going for one last run with Steph/Draymond.
I mean if he’s shut a better player why are the wiz still losing? I’m sure his contribution for lead to wins considering Beal out here dropping 40+
Because the Wizards are a bad team. They're one of the most poorly-coached and poorly-constructed teams in the league. Furthermore, he barely gets any touches or has any involvement whenever Westbrook and Beal are on the floor, because they both dominate the ball, and everyone else is there to just spread the floor or feed off the scraps.
He'd be perfect right now for the Warriors as a stretch-4.
He's looking like a problem, alright, a problem for his own team.
Isn’t he hurt?
But ya they should have traded that pick and got key role players like they used to have.
Kiyoshi-Dono
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2015
- Messages
- 87,211
- Reputation
- 33,066
- Daps
- 467,636
- Reppin
- Petty Vandross.. fukk Yall
He’s 19 years old
God y’all nikkas trash we the commentary
God y’all nikkas trash we the commentary
You mean I wanted to trade Wiseman for pieces that would've helped this team maximize this core's closing window?You wanted to trade Wiseman for Marcus Smart and the Celtics pick
You sure told me.
He’s 19 years old
God y’all nikkas trash we the commentary
the commentary is there because all this talk about his age is asinine , since you had rookies u could have picked, or trades that could have made , that would helped you not just in the future but also NOW in the present
all this bu bu he is 19 ,give it time ?? how old is MELO .... 
how old is deni , who else could you have traded the pick for that could have helped now and in the near future , instead of dependin on 1 legged klay and a aging steph next yearuse some fn common sense
the goal is to get the most out of the star you have at the moment .. not wait for the rookie to develop in 3 or 5 years time
Last edited:
Lets keel it real, only reason warriors didn't draft Lamelo is because of Lavar.
tremonthustler1
aka bx_representer
No. Lavar has more to do with why he didn’t go first than 2nd (and even then his presence wasn’t as big of a deterrent).
The Warriors took Wiseman because you need size to win in the NBA and he offers size combined with his basketball abilities. Good teams will eat them alive regardless of how good they can shoot.
ALonelyDad
Veteran
Issue isn't if he will be good or not, I think he will but will he be good during Stephs last run. Warriors are in a tough position. I felt like LaMelo was the best of both worlds, someone who can contribute right away and also be your future piece. Warriors really haven't had great bigs in their runs because with Draymond you dont need one. You just need a capable big.
