Preach! That's called being accountable and admitting they fukked up but most woman will not do that.if a woman believes she doesn't need a man, what are the odds of her picking a suitable provider and father of her children? y'all like to act like the problem begins at child birth. the problem begins when the woman chooses who she's going to allow to nut inside her.
women fukk glorified sperm donors, then we have to hear about how he's a deadbeat
I see far more black women on their hotep, Erykah Badu, pro black spiel while dating interracially than I do black males.
Due to the sexual politics behind wm/bw unions and the fact the black man is...well, a black man and the face of direct opposition to white supremacy, that won't ever be addressed however.
There's no money or butter biscuit in that article.
Absolutely pathetic.
You nikkas are like spoilt children. You see black women and white men as your parents since all adult responsibilities on laid on our shoulders. It's why I've always maintained that black men and white women are socialised to bytch complain whine and the adults of society ( black women and white men respectively) for all their failures.
Why do we need black men though? For education? Jobs? Health care? Housing? Political representation?
I don't see how some of the men here would agree with the author but at the same time complain about how much his empowering black women.
What's wrong with what he is suggestin when it comes to our women?
You are not Pro-Black if you erase Black women who are feminists from the conversation by telling them that feminism destroys the Black family unit
The word "simp" in itself is a joke for the exact reason you pointed out, guys use it arbitrarily and in contradictory ways, one person's "HOH" is another person's "simp."
These guys think they're entitled to p*ssy and when they see women having sex with men they believe don't deserve it, they become enraged and angry at the woman for having agency over her own body, why is this? Because these males think they should have more control over a woman's body than an actual woman should.
Why do we need black men though? For education? Jobs? Health care? Housing? Political representation?
That's not the premise of the article though. That's just the premise that he hid behind. He contradicts that premise by advocating for black feminists who have started an entire ideology on the strength of being pro their gender. If you're going to go on a crusade chastising blacks for perpetuating a gender divide black feminists would be first on the list. They're in cahoots with white racist liberals though, so you get bullshyt propaganda like this posted in mainstream news outlets. Black men ain't shyt, is the real premise of the article. It's that old trick where you get a c00n or sellout of a specific demographic to say things that people against that demographic want to say and promote without actually saying it themselves.I agree with the author's central premise that you can't be Pro-Black for just one gender. That doesn't make any damn sense.
But some of the shyt he said is clearly simping.