Winter is Coming

[Konnan]

We found Dahell cac its a celebration

 

[agnosticlady]

Not even close....I have come across different forums and the mess said by non blacks especially whites towards black people is beyond disgusting. I used to use a forum that had racist whites pretending to be black women/black men and they would call themselves banannuthsequa, tyronenikka, bambooniqua, and etc. They would make racist shyt and troll endlessly. Even the whites that weren't trolling and just using the site would spout some racist nonsense. I've heard by some black people that those gaming sites have a lot of racist stuff on it too. The Coli is nowhere near racist.

 

[Dev2103]

visit one of the MANY anti black sites and you will see real racism in the forums...this guy is a joker

 

[Warren Moon]

I promise you that if you reread the article that it does not say that "1/4 25% of black males are marrying out?"

The "new marriages that we have been discussing" (meaning 2010 (which is not new)); the 25% number is actually is in reference to Hispanics and Asians. Hispanics and Asians is who the 25% refers to; it does not refer to Black people, because a sentence later the article states that Black people were only 11.9% of the marriages. So somebody saw interracial and they assumed Black, when in fact the article is referencing Blacks, Hispanics and Asians as being different racially than Whites.

Secondly, the article clearly states that if/when Black people do intermarry then Black men "were more than twice as likely (24% to 9%) to do so than Black women. That is not the same thing as saying that 25% of Black men are marrying out. What is really being said is that if Black men and Black women married outside of their race; then Black men are likely to do so more than twice as often as Black women. That is in line with the 2014 stats that I showed from the Black Demographics website.

Here are the quotes from article:

- In all, more than 15 percent of new marriages in 2010 were interracial.

- According to the Pew report, more than 25 percent of Hispanics and Asians who married in 2010 had a spouse of a different race. That's compared to 17.1 percent of blacks and 9.4 percent of whites. Of the 275,500 new interracial marriages in 2010, 43 percent were white-Hispanic couples, 14.4 percent were white-Asian, 11.9 percent were white-black, and the remainder were other combinations.

-Still, the share of Asians who intermarried has actually declined recently - from 30.5 percent in 2008 to 27.7 percent in 2010. In contrast, blacks who married outside their race increased in share from 15.5 percent to 17.1 percent, due in part to a rising black middle class that has more interaction with other races.

-Intermarriage among whites rose in share slightly, while among Hispanics the rate was flat, at roughly 25.7 percent.

-Broken down by gender, black men were more than twice as likely as black women to marry someone outside their race - 24 percent to 9 percent. The reverse held true for Asian men - 17 percent intermarried, compared to 36 percent among Asian women.


Interracial marriages in the U.S. hit all-time high
Interracial marriages in the U.S. hit all-time high

What am I missing in the article about Black men and 25%?

It literally says black men marry out at 24% in the quote u just did.

If u add black men at 24 and black women at 9 that gets to the 17% collectively (really 16.5% buts its rounded).

to get to the real 17.1% one of the numbers(24% or 9% has to be higher than the number given of 17.1

They rounded down to 24% and I rounded up to 25%

U cant be that Dumb, u cant be u literally put the number down that was trying to refute what im saying. I make the font big to help u out.

Moafukka, that does not mean what you think that it means. The 24% to 9% refers to the likelihood. It states that if Black people get intermarried that it is likely that Black men will do it more than twice as likely as Black Women. That goes to probability.

That is not the same thing as saying that "25% of black males are marrying out." OP is literally saying that if there were 100 Black men that got married; then 25 of them were interracial.

That is complete bullshyt and if you can't understand that then we are done; because you don't understand what was stated and what the article is actually stating.[/QUOTE]

Ok listen 17.1 of blacks marry out. It says that.

The study you provided(Interracial marriages in the U.S. hit all-time high) cites this study and thats where they got their numbers

I provided u with that study.
Interracial marriage: Who is ‘marrying out’?

In this study it says . Fully a quarter of black men who got married in 2013 married someone who was not black.

Do u understand now? it is in plain english.

The likelihood word I know confused u. But the reason the reasons its a likelihood is bc its based of of fact.

So if someone says 25% of black males have a likelihood of marrying out, its bc (read slowly) 25% of blacks have married out.

Its a fact that 25% of new marriages black males are marrying other races.

 

[Ezigbo Nwanyi]

How did i miss this thread...Shots fired and bullets spraying

 

[Wild self]

How did i miss this thread...Shots fired and bullets spraying

Who you agree with?

 

[mrken12]

SF, reddit, 4ch@n, and basically every other mostly white forum say otherwise. One star.

 

[Samori Toure]

Moafukka, that does not mean what you think that it means. The 24% to 9% refers to the likelihood. It states that if Black people get intermarried that it is likely that Black men will do it more than twice as likely as Black Women. That goes to probability.

That is not the same thing as saying that "25% of black males are marrying out." OP is literally saying that if there were 100 Black men that got married; then 25 of them were interracial.

That is complete bullshyt and if you can't understand that then we are done; because you don't understand what was stated and what the article is actually stating.

Ok listen 17.1 of blacks marry out. It says that.

The study you provided(Interracial marriages in the U.S. hit all-time high) cites this study and thats where they got their numbers

I provided u with that study.
Interracial marriage: Who is ‘marrying out’?

In this study it says . Fully a quarter of black men who got married in 2013 married someone who was not black.

Do u understand now? it is in plain english.

The likelihood word I know confused u. But the reason the reasons its a likelihood is bc its based of of fact.

So if someone says 25% of black males have a likelihood of marrying out, its bc (read slowly) 25% of blacks have married out.

Its a fact that 25% of new marriages black males are marrying other races.[/QUOTE]


These are your words son:

"25% of new marriages black men are marrying out. Can u read son?

Of course it's 86% are married to black women older generations rarely married out and they are more likely to get married.

New marriages 1 out of 4 black men are not marrying black women

Math is a pain, work on ur reading skills"

http://www.thecoli.com/posts/15149133/

YOU STATED THAT "25% of new marriages black men are marrying out"

No where in that article does it say 25% and Black anything. The article clearly stated " 25% percent of Hispanics and Asians who married in 2010 had a spouse of a different race."
Those are the new marriages that you were referring too, but you misread that shyt and now you are trying to shyt talk your way out of it instead of just admitting that you misread the statement and assumed that interracial included Black people too; when it clearly didn't.

On top of that you are trying to bluff your way through a ratio of 24:9 and are trying to pretend like that is what you meant. First of all 24% is not 25% like you stated and secondly the 24% is part of a ratio 24%:9%; which is not the number of new marriages, but it shows the likelihood or probability.

You can stop using all of the dumb ass facial memes too, because it just makes you look stupider for not understanding what the article is stating.

 

[Warren Moon]

Ok listen 17.1 of blacks marry out. It says that.

The study you provided(Interracial marriages in the U.S. hit all-time high) cites this study and thats where they got their numbers

I provided u with that study.
Interracial marriage: Who is ‘marrying out’?

In this study it says . Fully a quarter of black men who got married in 2013 married someone who was not black.

Do u understand now? it is in plain english.

The likelihood word I know confused u. But the reason the reasons its a likelihood is bc its based of of fact.

So if someone says 25% of black males have a likelihood of marrying out, its bc (read slowly) 25% of blacks have married out.

Its a fact that 25% of new marriages black males are marrying other races.

These are your words son:

"25% of new marriages black men are marrying out. Can u read son?

Of course it's 86% are married to black women older generations rarely married out and they are more likely to get married.

New marriages 1 out of 4 black men are not marrying black women

Math is a pain, work on ur reading skills"

http://www.thecoli.com/posts/15149133/

YOU STATED THAT "25% of new marriages black men are marrying out"

No where in that article does it say 25% and Black anything. The article clearly stated " 25% percent of Hispanics and Asians who married in 2010 had a spouse of a different race."
Those are the new marriages that you were referring too, but you misread that shyt and now you are trying to shyt talk your way out of it instead of just admitting that you misread the statement and assumed that interracial included Black people too; when it clearly didn't.

On top of that you are trying to bluff your way through a ratio of 24:9 and are trying to pretend like that is what you meant. First of all 24% is not 25% like you stated and secondly the 24% is part of a ratio 24%:9%; which is not the number of new marriages, but it shows the likelihood or probability.

You can stop using all of the dumb ass facial memes too, because it just makes you look stupider for not understanding what the article is stating.

What does Fully a quarter of black men who got married in 2013 married someone who was not black?mean

Yes or no question. Does that mean that 25% of black men are marrying out in new marriages?

 

[KOOL-AID]

What's dikk pricing for these days? Tree-fiddy? $2.75?

this is foreign dikk from Africa....$5 per inch

 

[Vice Queen]

this is foreign dikk from Africa....$5 per inch

That's a bit steep. It better be good or else

 

[Samori Toure]

What does Fully a quarter of black men who got married in 2013 married someone who was not black?mean

Yes or no question. Does that mean that 25% of black men are marrying out in new marriages?

Whatever moafukka. You got caught move selling bullshyt. Move on.

 

[EpicStoryTeller]

shyt aint even true either. Black girls are always the nicest to me, followed by Hispanic girls.

Asian girls saying hey?

When my tall ass gets in an elevator with an Asian girl, I can literally feel them shaking in fear. The last thing they want to do is talk to me.

Maybe they don't like tall men

 

[Warren Moon]

Akan/Igbo negged you for your post in the thread Can we have a grown conversation on why 1/4 25% of black males are marrying out?. With the following comment: Moafukka you stupid and you can't comprehend what you have read.
6 minutes ago





Im so glad I quoted ur posts I hope every nikka that reads it understand how smart you

Whatever moafukka. You got caught move selling bullshyt. Move on.

Yo answer the question. Yes or no? Fully a quarter of black men who got married in 2013 married someone who was not black.

Does that mean 25% of black males are marrying other races in new marriages?



Haha whats the likelihood breh?

 

[thewiz]

she a freak hoe



RIP Speaker Knockerz