Will The Real MVP Please Stand Up: Ravens vs Bills (Playoff Divisional Round)

Who Advances to the AFC Championship Game?


  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .

Braman

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
14,496
Reputation
3,306
Daps
58,205

RAVENS MAY BE DONE.

THIS GIVES ME SEAHAWK
SUPER BOWL VIBES
WHERE THE TEAM WAS NEVER
THE SAME AGAIN

:devil:
:evil:


Huh :heh:

Not the same at all. The ravens were fortunate to be that close. It was not a ‘we shoulda won’ situation

Age wise they’re pretty young.

Zay and bateman young. Andrews ready to be replaced by likely. Probably 1 more year of prime Henry and even still—-like I said when they signed him—-a RB is a dime o dozen in that system with Lamar. Anybody can come in and give you 5ypc running rpo with Lamar. Gus westwards, Keaton Mitchell, jk dobbins all did. It’s only the pass game that will win them a chip

Defensively Humphrey 28. Madubike and Roquan 27. I’d say they have 2 years both age wise and bc they’ll have to pay Kyle Hamilton.
 

yseJ

Empire strikes back
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
2,662
Daps
65,169
Reppin
The Yay
Huh :heh:

Not the same at all. The ravens were fortunate to be that close. It was not a ‘we shoulda won’ situation

Age wise they’re pretty young.

Zay and bateman young. Andrews ready to be replaced by likely. Probably 1 more year of prime Henry and even still—-like I said when they signed him—-a RB is a dime I dozen in that system with Lamar. Henry specifier no value added when it mattered the ravens will o ly win with the pass game

Defensively Humphrey 28. Madubike ans Roquan 27. I’d say they have 2 years both age wise and bc they’ll have to pay Kyle Hamilton. They got 2 years

Their window is really gonna get funky when they have to pay Hamilton, when Humphrey declines
They will have to rely on their offense more, but with healthy Lamar and Henry that shouldn't be a problem.
 

Copy Ninja

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
9,304
Reputation
701
Daps
33,204
He dumped Flacco (SB winner) and went all in on Jackson when no other coach in the league wouldve had the balls

Remade his offense around him.

Got him to MVP caliber, first as a run first wildcat QB (Vick 2.0), and now as a pass first playmaker. Harbaugh had the vision when no one else in the league did. Even when LJ was sniffing free agency the league stayed away.

Won double digits every year outside of 2021 (injuries everywhere) in the LJ era

Got to the AFC championship last year and again, Zay Flowers fumbled the game away

Yall just want to yell and be mad. If anything his offense let him down tonight

Theres like 2-3 teams right now the past few seasons (Niners, Ravens, ) that are right there. Doesnt mean you gotta fire everyone cause KC are the 90s Chicago Bulls

Yeah this is not Harbaugh's fault. Him and his staff made great adjustments in the second half, offense was unstoppable if they if not for the TOs, and defense controlled the Bills offense. He put his players to succeed.

At some point, players gotta make plays. KC always winning because Mahomes and Kelce always seem to make plays when they need it.
 

The_Sheff

A Thick Sauce N*gga
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
25,758
Reputation
4,972
Daps
117,657
Reppin
ATL to MEM

IT DOES MATTER
BUT IT ALSO HAD THE SAME EFFECT
AS A PUNT SO THERES
NO NEED TO HARP ON
A STALE MATE T.O.


:devil:
:evil:


No the fukk it doesn't. You cant base the impact of a turnover strictly on what your opponent does next. Because first and foremost the turnover prevented you from getting points.

A turnover on your side of the field means your opponent is getting great field position. Even if they don't score, the field position is swapped in their favor.

A turnover on your opponents side of the field means you were most likely in at least FG range and are being deprived of a scoring opportunity.


Both are exponentially worse than a punt. There is a reason why the tunover margin is the overwhelming leading indicator of who wins a football game. Teams that win the turnover margin +3 have a 90% chance at winning the game taking into account everything else that could possibly happen in a game. Losing it at just -1 means your opponent wins +65% of the time.
 
Last edited:

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
19,728
Reputation
3,305
Daps
53,391
Reppin
NULL
The INT didnt matter. And the fumble happened directly after Andrews dropped a pass.

they were selling out on the run there. Andrews was wide open. There is no debati g the call. It was the perfect play
You cant say a TO doesnt matter....especially in the playoffs. You took away a chance at points in a game you lost by 2. It didnt lose them the game but it damn sure didnt help. And it wasnt a tip...it was a flat out bad throw.

When you got two of the best runners in the league and you need two yds you should use that in some way...a playaction at least. There was literally no benefit to having Lamar and Henry on that play.
 

GunRanger

Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
31,091
Reputation
4,764
Daps
102,875
The INT doss matter because that's a drive you don't get points on.


How the fukk is such a basic principle of football eluding some of yall? :mindblown:
In the end it didnt matter. You can blame any of the other three amd outs as equally bad. Yall harp on shyt instead of dealing with reality because youve been told to. Use your brain
 

broller

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
26,622
Reputation
2,750
Daps
75,691
Huh :heh:

Not the same at all. The ravens were fortunate to be that close. It was not a ‘we shoulda won’ situation

Age wise they’re pretty young.

Zay and bateman young. Andrews ready to be replaced by likely. Probably 1 more year of prime Henry and even still—-like I said when they signed him—-a RB is a dime o dozen in that system with Lamar. Anybody can come in and give you 5ypc running rpo with Lamar. Gus westwards, Keaton Mitchell, jk dobbins all did. It’s only the pass game that will win them a chip

Defensively Humphrey 28. Madubike and Roquan 27. I’d say they have 2 years both age wise and bc they’ll have to pay Kyle Hamilton.

It's also different when it's not the QB who made the terminal "mistake"
 

calh45

Cal
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,829
Reputation
2,132
Daps
41,656
Because they like to play favorites in who gets slander and who doesn’t.

:russ:

You are the absolute last person to pretend like you be in these threads completely unbiased and making commentary on the rest of the forum having some issue being honest.

Everyone gets shyt on here including Pat. Lamar ain't been exempt from getting shytted on in after failed playoff runs, that's the primary topic with him, but you pretend like people exempt him from criticism as if you're only who sees what he actually is because folks acknowledge he's good as fukk. This is the first time folks are actually kinda giving him a little grace after the playoffs. Every other year he's been getting cooked. No one else pretends like that doesn't happen.
 

Bone$

Dynasty Continues...
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,511
Reputation
1,640
Daps
25,928
No the fukk it doesn't.

A turnover on your side of the field means your opponent is getting great field position.

A turnover on your opponents side of the field means you were most likely in at least FG range and are being deprived of a scoring opportunity.


Both are exponentially worse than a punt. There is a reason why the tunover margin is the overwhilimg leading indicator of who wins a football game. Teams that win the turnover margin +3 have a 90% chance at winning the game taking into account everything else that could possibly happen in a game.
Except the interception was from their own 30 and ended with the bills inside their own 40... And they didn't score off of it and it didn't put them in direct scoring position... Empty possessions happen... Shyt happens it's how you respond.. You have an opportunity to take the lead, and fumble with momentum . That's a back breaker inside the 40.. You also drop the game tying pass.. Direct plays that effect the game
 
Top