Reid2Achieve
Superstar
The NBA is already pretty heavily invested in Curry at this point. Narrative too skrong
The NBA is already pretty heavily invested in Curry at this point. Narrative too skrong
I think that Lebron-less teams will struggle way more than a Curry-less team. That's what MVP means to me. I'm not sold that Curry can make a sub 500 team and above 500 the way I am Lebron can.
Bron should have 5 right now going for his sixth...Rose over Bron for MVP was one of the biggest travesty's in modern NBA history
Should Dwyane Wade have won MVP in the 2008-09 season? :AhaTariq:
Absolutely wrong.
Rose didn't deserve the MVP over Bron in 2010-11 breh. The media and casual fans still held it against Bron that he ditched CLE and went to MIA.
I don't what answer you want me to give you but personally I don't think Wade has ever been the best player in the league and I like Wade.
Rose didn't deserve the MVP over Bron in 2010-11 breh. The media and casual fans still held it against Bron that he ditched CLE and went to MIA.
How did Rose not deserve MVP?
Did you not see his stats? Did you not see the impact he had on the Bulls? Did you not see the Bulls that year?
You're a delusional Bron stan.
Don't get me wrong, Rose had a great season & an MVP level season, but Bron completely changed the culture of a mediocre Miami team into a championship contender overnight
Bron had better stats that season too: Bron 27 ppg, 8 reb, 7 ast vs. Rose 25 ppg, 8 ast, 4 reb plus he beat Rose in 5 in the ECF. Seems pretty obvious
Check Wade's 2008-09 stats. He was having the best individual season in the league at the time and was virtually doing what LeBron's doing this season. For you to say that Wade didn't deserve the MVP in 08/09 and then praise LeBron as MVP for doing the same thing Wade did in 08/09 is retarded.
And the NBA doesn't go to the best player in the league, per se. It generally goes to the best player on the best team.
So Curry will likely get it.