Pure Water
Veteran
This is not true.EVs are cool. But they're not practical. And worse for the environment than regular combustion engine vehicles.
This is not true.EVs are cool. But they're not practical. And worse for the environment than regular combustion engine vehicles.
Compared to the impact oil production and CO2 emissions have, yes, it is better on a per car basis. It will continue to improve as battery manufacturers and electric motor makers move to elements that are less expensive and easier to source and energy production moves away from coal.
It's a done deal. The move away from gasoline to EV and possibly hydrogen for new car production is guaranteed as we move closer to 2030. Anything reducing the CO2 and other noxious gasses produced by gas/diesel-powered motor vehicles is a plus.
200-300mi is where most EVs are at right now. That number is on par or slightly less than most gas vehicles today. For someone driving 50-100 miles a day with access to a charger, they are very practical. The exponential improvement from even 5 years ago will continue to the point where those issues become irrelevant.Not practical because of range and charging time. Also the future price of electricity is another variable that will be a major issue in the future
Its proven ev batteries are terrible for the environment. From harvesting minerals. To disposing of the battery. Also unethical mining is a whole other issue. This is an issue already and what % of the population is driving ev? Imagine when everybody is. Its also not sustainable.
The push for ev's is not about the environment its about making money. Thats why every auto maker is moving towards ev's because the politicians pushing "clean" energy are all cashing in alternative energy. Their marketing is great, thats why they got all the fan boys thinking they're saving the world while india and china are destroying the climate.
You think these companies care about the environment when they’re basically enslaving people to create these “environmentally safe” vehicles? How do you think they’re transporting these materials? Processing these materials? Powering the factories to create them?And its still better for the environment than driving an equivalent gasoline-powered vehicle.
There's nothing to be learned from a Joe Rogan podcast.
Depends on where you live. As anyone with minimal knowledge of US energy production knows, our reliance on coal for energy production will continue its decline in coming years.Just barely. You still burning coal to recharge EV.
And what happens to those batteries 15 years down the line?
With that said, Porsche is developing efuel, so gasoline may be here to stay.
I didn’t say anything about “environmentally safe”. I said they are better in that aspect than gas powered vehicles. There’s a difference.You think these companies care about the environment when they’re basically enslaving people to create these “environmentally safe” vehicles? How do you think they’re transporting these materials? Processing these materials? Powering the factories to create them?
Learn to separate the lesson from the teacher, most people don’t know where there batteries come from or how they’re made so I’d argue that that there are things to be learned from his podcast like this. I don’t care for him either but the message is still valid and concerning.