But for niqqas to claim they know who initiated that night, or they know exactly what was going threw the mind of another human being is 
.
criminal threatening is putting someone in fear of bodily harm -- the phone call from travvon about that crakker showed that his 'threat perception' was increased due to GZ.. Combine that with the 911 operator commanding gz to back down because they knew the situation would be worse if he proceed = how the fukk is he not found guilty.
I'm basing this off what ur saying, what cac say, and what c00ns say - that
we don't know who initiated....
shyt was initiated when GZ approached... he had no legitimate business with tm at all.
You have to have the means to carry out a threat to be considered la threat... well gz was a grown man, and had a loaded weapon, and he followed him.
In Florida, u can go to jail for just looking at someone for too long - charged w stalking. There are basically a million ways that he could have been found guilty and u know it. Florida does have this fukked up stand ur ground.... BUT it has a million ways that GM should have been found guilty..
784.048 Stalking; definitions; penalties.—
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Harass” means to engage in a course of conduct directed at a specific person which causes substantial emotional distress to that person and serves no legitimate purpose.
(b) “Course of conduct” means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, which evidences a continuity of purpose. The term does not include constitutionally protected activity such as picketing or other organized protests.
(c) “Credible threat” means a verbal or nonverbal threat, or a combination of the two, including threats delivered by electronic communication or implied by a pattern of conduct, which places the person who is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family members or individuals closely associated with the person, and which is made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat to cause such harm. It is not necessary to prove that the person making the threat had the intent to actually carry out the threat. The present incarceration of the person making the threat is not a bar to prosecution under this section.
Plus you can only make a citizens arrest in florida if u think the person just committed a felony.
to claim self defense in florida: you can't be the aggressor... creating a threat in a persons mind (tm) makes u the first aggressor , you also have to practice avoidance...
You don't need to know exactly what was going through their minds to convict him...(even though we have clues based on both of them talking shyt on the phone before the murder---)
Based on those phone calls who sounded like the predator and who sounded like the prey??
for cacs? shut the fukk up.
towards the new school intelligentsia than outright 
I'm already showing doubt over GZ's testimony. 
Just to be clear, we are calling them c00ns/uncle toms because they didn't think the evidence supported a guilty verdict in the case?
Get a life
