$cam-U-Well_Jack$on
Superstar
Because most folks feel as though they shouldn't have to be held accountable for their actions/behaviors towards others. As though they're above consequence.
Why is Vindictiveness and revenge looked down upon?
- Thread starter Rhapscallion Démone
- Start date
Justice is what is owed, impartially; it's yours. Could one be selfish about what is owed to them?
Some people thought Dr. King, Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, Huey P Newton were unreasonable. Sometimes you have to be unreasonable. Sometimes you have to be consumed by a cause
Sometimes you have to get mad and be unreasonable when someone has unreasonably wronged you
If you can reasonably reach unreasonability, is it still unreasonable?
$cam-U-Well_Jack$on
Superstar
I love revenge.
No and vengeance, retribution, vindication is also something that is owed to someone who has been wronged. So why is one deemed selfish while the other isn'tJustice is what is owed, impartially; it's yours. Could one be selfish about what is owed to them?
Cacs love revenge and retribution. It’s how they’ve operated for centuries.
they just don’t like it when it’s against them. MLK was hands down the most hated man in his time just for fighting for equality. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Make up some shyt about Iraq WMD and then steal the oil. Their museums full of ill gotten gains.
Fr this world is outrageous brehs.
they just don’t like it when it’s against them. MLK was hands down the most hated man in his time just for fighting for equality. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Make up some shyt about Iraq WMD and then steal the oil. Their museums full of ill gotten gains.
Fr this world is outrageous brehs.
Lmao I personally don't think so. I feel like some people would like to label individuals unreasonable out of fear of retaliation like @Hoodoo Child and @$cam-U-Well_Jack$on said
None of them were seeking revenge though.
Presumably it's about the packaging and public relations effort.
Justice can be achieved through vindictive and retributive means. When it's no longer "justice" is when actions are no longer seemed justifiable or reasonable; which is to say, go "overboard" when fueled by purely emotional motives.
Justice seems to have a cozy relationship with a governing apparatus so maybe that why it's more of an "acceptable" motive.
I was watching MSNBC today and someone on there said one of Georges family members was watching the footage and all they could do was scream. I think sometimes going with your emotions, that gut feeling, that intuition will help you more than fighting it or holding it in. We're human not robots.Be unable to control your emotions and think it should be acceptable brehs
But they were painted to be disruptive, unreasonable and antagonistic. Just like most people who seek revenge are labeled those things. But it seems like it all depends on who you're talking to
Because I know black people aint evil enough to take it where them crackers is willing to take it. We not kneeling on the necks of random cacs because we not depraved like that. That's why we haven't already blown this motherfukker up twice over. We not like them and I don't want to give these racist motherfukkers the gratification of saying "I told you so" in regards to that goofy ass race war bullshyt they be peddling forever.
But at some point you have to stop caring about what people think and start doing what you have to do and what's right. If someone has intentionally hurt you then you are owed some get back imo