stop the name calling. stick to the argument.
When the fukk did I name call you?
What?!
you can't force your interpretation down my throat. the implication of what i said is "because they love the pale they are gonna love white skin to a greater degree" not "they love white skin because white taught them to.".
Again, this is a juelz.
Do you not understand context???
We were in this thread talking about treatment amongst non-Japanese people in Japan, and you came through with "not true" and then started talking about how they prefer White people in ads.
Trying to shift the discussion to Japanese people PREFERRING THEMSELVES TO BE LIGHTER SKINNED was not a point against "Japanese people treat all non-Japanese the same"
Fam, at best, you were wildly off-topic, and at worst, you are lying because I caught you in 4K.
Pick one.
the point being that they accept white faces on billboards where they would have an issue with black ones
Again, this is wrong.
If this were even remotely true, the Japanese would have never voted for Dante Carver as the top actor in Japanese ads. A Black man beat out a native Japanese actor that held that position for 8 straight years.
That has NEVER happened for a White actor.
You.
Are.
WRONG.
Actor Dante Carver became Japan’s top TV commercial star back in 2008. He is famous for appearing in a series of ads for Softbank Mobile. It is a huge accomplishment done by a non-Japanese c…
internationalwayne101.wordpress.com
you are the movie guy and you are talking in absolutes.
i already listed some. go back and answer this points that you skipped over before.
Actually, you didn't.
Saying words is not posting evidence. I asked you for evidence, you brought up my join date.
(black) racial stereotypes are racism breh. innocent micro aggressions are racism breh.
I am not a liberal. Don't speak to me in newspeak-- we Black here. Racism is the negative attitudes towards one on the basis of race/ethnic background, with a particular emphasis on the ability to act on that negative attitude through systemic means or the ability to cause harm.
Saying "Japanese people saw some movies, and asked a Black person was he a basketball player" IS NOT RACISM.
You completely undermine the severity of that word. "Ignorance", hell even "prejudice" would be better words. Claiming racism when they thought you were Kevin Hart is ridiculous.
Sorry, try again.
you think limiting surveys to "educated", "international students", "women" from "east asia" marrying "any foreigner" (relative) is a statistical basis for whether japanese (general) are racist against brehs (absolute) or not?
I'm starting to think I'm talking to an incompetent that can't keep up with a conversation past two posts...
NO NIKKA-- that post was in literal reference
TO YOU STATING JAPANESE WOMEN DON'T LOVE BLACK MEN AND TO SAY SO IS INACCURATE
Here's the context, and try to keep up this time:
all this "japanese love brehs" stuff is not accurate. some might but generally racism against brehs is more acute than racism against crehs.
Lmao this is just inaccurate
Japanese women are statistically the largest East Asian group to date and marry interracially. Almost without FAIL, Japanese women (excluding Burapan) profess to have NO RACIAL PREFERENCE WHEN DATING.
^^^^Clearly, that is NOT me talking about general racism against Black people, goofy. I'm responding to YOUR question DIRECTLY. You can't even keep up with your own shyt, that's hilarious!
The point of me posting the study was to show that in general, Japanese women do not express a racial preference, and are statistically the most likely of the East Asian groups to date/marry interracially. That's the topic of discussion.
i ain't gonna explain why japanese female students being the most relaxed east asisns about marrying any non-asian foreigner says nothing about whether racism exists against brehs relative to gringos in general in japan breh.
Correction: You
can't so you won't.
The fact remains that the study was specifically about attitudes towards interracial marriage. I backed that up with a video of random Japanese women being specifically asked would they date a BLACK man.
your "study" seems to have interviewed ONLY 47 people breh. 47 ... or did i get that wrong?
I'm curious what that has to do with literally anything?
It's a study-- the sample size was large enough to draw accurate conclusions that literally back up what I have been saying this whole time. At the top left, the study states quite clearly that it was peer-reviewed, thus making it not only scientific, but also that it HAS BEEN REPLICATED BY OTHER SCIENTISTS IN THE FIELD.
Do you not know what peer-review is, and how it works?
Here, this one's free:
What does it mean when a publication is peer reviewed? | U.S. Geological Survey
so rubbish attempt.
i know you can do better than that do if you want you can prepare and we can have a proper coli-debate another time.
you are so convinced that you are right that you are not preparing and you are not listening.
so rather than you posting rubbish and me swatting it aside you now have time to address this
Oh no buddy, that's not how this works. You must answer the study posted. It's already been peer-reviewed, which means you'll have a hell of a time debunking that study. Saying "it's not enough people" is not a debunk. I could post a study with significantly more people, get the same results, and you'd still be unsatisfied because it contradicts you.
That's called "dishonesty"
Definition of DISHONESTY
You haven't swatted shyt aside, and I'm clearly embarrassing you here.
A: whites have to deal with general anti-gaijin racism.
B: brehs have to deal with "A" PLUS anti-black racism - anti-black stereotypes about job/education/etc, fashion, teaching english.
Again, citation needed.
Saying words is not evidence.
